| Date |
Text |
| 2010-01-12 11:36:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 WITH 2009 SUPPLEMENTS |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE THE SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET. |
| | ONLY AN EVALUATION REPORT WAS PROVIDED. THIS MAY BE |
| | AVAILABLE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. |
| | |
| | 2. NOTHING IS SHOWN IN THE CORNERS FOR STRUCTURAL |
| | SUPPORT, ONLY WHAT APPEARS TO BE A BLOCK WALL. SOME |
| | WOOD POSTS AND SOME PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT |
| | THIS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL RESIST WIND AND OTHER |
| | FORCES FBC R301. AS THERE ARE NO COLUMNS IN THE CORNERS |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE CONERS ARE CANTALEVERED FROM THE |
| | NEAREST COLUMN, BUT NO DIMENSION SHOWN BETWEEN NEW |
| | FILLED CELLS AND CORNERS. |
| | |
| | 3. SHEET 1, WALL LEGEND, GRAPHIC IS THE SAME FOR BOTH |
| | WALL TYPES. SCOPE NOT CLEAR FBC R301, FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 4. SHEET 1, TOP LEFT CORNER STATES THIS IS DESIGNED |
| | UNDER FBC2004 AND 140MPH EXPOSURE B. PLEASE REVISE |
| | BUILDING CODE AND EXPLAIN RATIONALE FOR EXPOSURE B OR |
| | REVISE TO EXPOSURE C, SEE FBC R301. NOTE THAT THE CODE |
| | CHANGED EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2009. |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL BE |
| | STRUCTURALLY CONTINUOUS WITH THE EXISTING. STRAPS ARE |
| | SHOWN, BUT NO REINFORCEMENT INTO FOOTING OR WOOD POSTS. |
| | ON THE PLAN IT APPEARS THAT ONE WALL WAS "EXISTING CMU" |
| | BASED ON GRAPHICS, THEN HOW DID THIS TIE INTO THE WOOD |
| | FRAME PORTION? EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED NEW IS |
| | NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 6. PLANS SHOW FILLED CELLS WITH NO STEEL REINFORCEMENT, |
| | BLOCK SITS ON A SLAB, WHAT WILL PREVENT MOVEMENT AT THE |
| | BOTTOM OF THE WALL? SEE FBC R 606.1, MASONRY |
| | CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530. |
| | |
| | 7. PLAN SHOWS SIMPSON STRAPS, PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FAC9B72. ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER |
| | TO SHOW THAT THE INTEGRITY OF STRAPS WILL BE MAINTAINED |
| | INSTALLED IN THIS MANNER (OVER STUCCO, EXPOSED TO THE |
| | WEATHER. |
| | |
| | 8. INSTALLATION LOCATIONS FOR THE STRAPS IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | ARE THEY TO BE INSTALLED IN HOLLOW BLOCK? PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS - PROVIDE LOAD INFORMATION AND |
| | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED STRAPS INSTALLED |
| | IN THIS MANNER WILL BE ADEQUATE TO RESIST WIND LOADS. |
| | |
| | 9. THE STRAP SPECIFIED IS NOT RATED FOR LATERAL LOADS. |
| | HOW HAS THIS BEEN ADDRESSED? |
| | |
| | 9. FOUNDATION DESIGN IS NOT CLEAR. NOTHING ON THE |
| | DETAIL TYPICAL WALL SECTION INDICATES HOW THIS WILL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED OR HOW THE EXISTING WILL BE STRUCTURALLY |
| | CONTINUOUS WITH THE PROPOSED NEW. IT IS DRAWN AS IF IT |
| | IS POURED AT ONE TIME, BUT TEXT INDICATES THAT A |
| | PORTION IS EXISTING AND A PORTION IS PROPOSED NEW. |
| | |
| | 10. FROM PREVIOUS LIST: FOR THE SHUTTERS, PLEASE |
| | COMPLETE THE SAMPLE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OR PROVIDE |
| | ALL INFORMATION TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE IN ANOTHER |
| | FORMAT, FBC*106, FBC R301, FBC1609. TWO SETS REQUIRED. |
| | THIS FORM IS AVAILABLE IN THE LOBBY OR ON THE INTERNET |
| | AT |
| | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/PDF/SCHEDULE_FOR_ |
| | INSTALLATION.PDF |
| | |
| | IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED, THIS PERMIT WILL |
| | BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO THAT A SEPARATE PERMIT OR |
| | REVISION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | 11. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR TRANSITIONS - EXISTING HOUSE TO |
| | GARAGE, POSTS TO "CMU BUILT AROUND." PLANS GRAPHICALLY |
| | SHOW 4X4 POSTS WITH A BLOCK WALL LINE ON THE INSIDE, |
| | HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? PROVIDE A DETAIL, INCLUDING |
| | ATTACHMENTS FOR EXISTING TO NEW. |
| | |
| | 12. SEE ACI530, A BLOCK WALL HAS A POURED AND |
| | REINFORCED TOP CAP TO MAINTAIN THE WALL'S INTEGRITY. |
| | NONE IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. HOW WILL YOU PREVENT |
| | FAILURE OF THE PORTIONS OF THE MASONRY WALL WHICH ARE |
| | NOT STRAPPED TO THE WOOD BEAM? NOTHING TIES THE WALL |
| | TOGETHER TO ACT AS ONE UNIT, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WILL |
| | RESIST WIND/LATERAL LOADS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
