| Date |
Text |
| 2009-12-02 08:42:39 | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS |
| | LEVEL 2 ALTERATION |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) ITEM #3 FROM THE FIRST REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED FROM THE SPACE PER |
| | FBC 1015.1 AND THERE ARE TWO EXIT STAIRS ARE PROVIDED. |
| | THE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL SHOULD NOT BE THROUGH THE |
| | RECEPTION AREA (SEE FBC 1014.2 EGRESS THROUGH |
| | INTERVENING SPACES). THE PATH OF TRAVEL SHOULD BE |
| | TOWARD EACH EXIT FROM CORRIDOR 164 AS THIS PROVIDES TWO |
| | SEPARATE AND DISTINCT PATHS OF EGRESS TRAVEL TO THE TWO |
| | EXITS AND REDUCES THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL LENGTH (100 |
| | FT MAXIMUM IN SPRINKLERED BUILDING). PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | EXIT LIGHT LOCATIONS ON SHEET A-3. CHANGE THE EXISTING |
| | EXIT SIGNS AND ADD NEW ONES SUCH THAT THE OCCUPANTS ARE |
| | DIRECTED TO THE TWO EXITS BY APPROVED SIGNS READILY |
| | VISIBLE FROM ANY DIRECTION OF EXIT ACCESS (SEE FBC |
| | 1006.3 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS). |
| | |
| | 2) THE TRAVEL DISTANCE INDICATED ON THE LIFE SAFETY |
| | PLAN WHICH STARTS IN CORRIDOR 164 IS NOT CORRECT. THE |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE IS FROM THE FARTHEST ACCESSIBLE POINT |
| | TO THE ENCLOSED EXIT STAIRS. SEE FBC 1016.1. IN THIS |
| | INSTANCE IT WOULD START FROM THE MOST REMOTE POINT OF |
| | THE BALCONY OR THE MOST REMOTE POINT OF THE MOST REMOTE |
| | ROOM IF THE BALCONY IS NOT ACCESSIBLE FROM THE ROOMS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE EXISTING 20 MINUTE DOOR TO THE COMMON CORRIDOR |
| | IS REQUIRED TO BE CHANGED TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF |
| | EGRESS TRAVEL IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FBC 1008.1.2. SEE |
| | FBC EXISTING BUILDING 705.1 AND 705.2 (EXCEPTION 2). |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS AND DRAWINGS FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED ROOF TOP UNIT SCREEN ENCLOSURE SPECIFIED ON |
| | SHEET A-4. SPECIFY ALL CONNECTIONS, ANCHORS, ETC. TO |
| | RESIST WIND LOADS AS REQUIRED BY FBC 1604.9 AND 1605.1. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
