| Date |
Text |
| 2009-12-10 10:24:43 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE CLARIFY, APPLICATION AND LETTER FROM ENGINEER |
| | STATES THAT THIS IS FOR AN OPAQUE DOOR, SPEC SHEETS |
| | SHOW A GLAZED DOOR. |
| | |
| | 2. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ENGINEER IS |
| | COMPARING THE PROPOSED DOOR TO AN APPROVED DOOR. A NOA |
| | FOR A DOOR WAS PROVIDED, BUT THE ENGINEER'S EVALUATION |
| | REPORT DOES NOT REFER TO THE NOA WHICH WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 3. THE EVALUATION REPORT REFERS TO "CATEGORY 5 |
| | ENGINEERS REPORT DATED 9/9/9." THE SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED |
| | HAVE A DATE OF 7/14/9. PLEASE INCLUDE DRAWING NUMBER AS |
| | WELL AS DATE. |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED HAVE NOT |
| | BEEN REVIEWED TO CONFIRM THAT IT IS THE SAME PRODUCT AS |
| | THE ONE TESTED (NOA) AS THE DOOR ENGINEERING IS NOT |
| | CONFIRMED (SEE COMMENT 3) AND THE NOA IS NOT REFERENCED |
| | IN THE ENGINEER'S EVALUATION REPORT (SEE ITEM 2). |
| | PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PRODUCTS |
| | |
| | 5. CATEGORY 5 ENGINEERING SERVICES IS LISTED AS THE |
| | THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY. PLEASE SEE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, THIS COMPANY IS NOT AN |
| | APPROVED THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY. PLEASE |
| | REVISE APPLICATION TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIRD PARTY |
| | QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY REQUIREMENTS FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE COMPLETE THE APPLICATION (ITEM1, 8,). AT THIS |
| | POINT THERE ARE MANY DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGE |
| | (DENIED FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL, PHOTOCOPY |
| | ENGINEERING AND NAMI CERTIFICATION WHICH IS NOT ON THE |
| | DCA WEBSITE, OTHER PRODUCT'S NOA) BUT NOT SPECIFICALLY |
| | REFERENCED IN THE APPLICATION OR ENGINEERING. PLEASE |
| | REVISE. |
| | |
| | |
