| Date |
Text |
| 2009-09-14 11:26:44 | RESPOND TO; |
| | DEAN S. LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR |
| | W-494-1083, F-494-1116, [email protected] |
| | 4TH FLOOR ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | |
| | FAILED. |
| | GENERAL: |
| | G.1. COMMENTS FROM PPRC CASE #Z09060010 HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | MET. |
| | G.2. COMMENTS BY OTHER REVIEWERS IN CONSTRUCTION |
| | SERVICES MUST BE MET PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES. |
| | G.3. APPROVAL FROM PLANNING HAS TO BE GIVEN PRIOR TO |
| | FINAL APPROVAL FROM ENGINEERING SERVICES. PLANS WILL |
| | NEED TO BE REDRAWN AND THEN SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING. |
| | STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, WITH PRE-VERSUS POST FLOWS |
| | ARE REQUIRED. |
| | G.4. WHEN PLAN IS APPROVED ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE ALLEY AND |
| | S. ROSEMARY. PERMITS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES/TRAFFIC DIVISION. |
| | G.5. ALL OF THE PPRC AND COMMENTS BY CONSTRUCTION |
| | SERVICES NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
| | G.6. DEMO PLAN REQUIRED FOR EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
| | SITE: |
| | S.1. THIS IS TWO SEPARATE SITES. WHAT IS THE PLAN, |
| | DIVIDE IT INTO TWO PERMITS AND TWO SITES OR COMBINE THE |
| | PROPERTIES UNDER A UNITY OF TITLE? |
| | S.2. IS THE ALLEY TO BE ABANDONED? IF NOT, AND THIS IS |
| | TO BE A UNIFIED SITE, THEN PRIVATE UTILITY LINES WILL |
| | BE CROSSING THE ALLEY (ELECTRIC AND IRRIGATION) A |
| | PRIVATE UTILITY PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE APPLIED FOR. |
| | WARNING THE ALLEY IS FILLED WITH BURIED UTILITIES, THEY |
| | SHOULD BE SHOWN TO REDUCE THE CHANCE OF THE CONTRACTORS |
| | CUTTING THEM. |
| | S.3. THE REDESIGN OF THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN WILL NOT |
| | WORK. IF I WANT TO ACCESS THE PARKING LOT AND NOT PAY A |
| | PARKING FEE I WILL JUST DRIVE DOWN THE UNPAVED ALLEY TO |
| | THE EAST DRIVEWAY AND PULL IN, BY-PASSING THE AUTOMATIC |
| | GATES AT THE WEST ENTRANCE AND EXIT. I COULD LEAVE THE |
| | SAME WAY. |
| | LANDSCAPING: |
| | L.1. SWALES CAN NOT HAVE HEDGES AND MULCH IN THEM. |
| | RUN-OFF WILL TAKE THE MULCH AND FILL THE STORM WATER |
| | SYSTEM, HEDGES WILL SLOW THE FLOW OF WATER AND |
| | EVENTUALLY FILL THE SWALE. EITHER REMOVE ALL |
| | LANDSCAPING FROM THE SWALES, OR REROUTE THE STORM WATER |
| | FLOW. |
| | IRRIGATION: |
| | I.1. IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS TOO GREAT FOR A 5/8, |
| | ?? OR 1??? METER, THAT IS THE ONLY SIZE METERS THAT CAN |
| | BE USED ON THE SERVICE SHOWN TO BE USED FOR THE |
| | IRRIGATION SYSTEM. REDESIGN THE SYSTEM SO THERE ARE |
| | MORE ZONES OR INCREASE THE METER, BACKFLOW PREVENTER |
| | AND PIPE SIZES TO ALLOW FOR THE REQUIRED FLOWS. THERE |
| | ARE 4 ZONES SHOWN OVER 30 GPM EACH, A 5/8??? METER WILL |
| | ONLY ALLOW 10 GPM FOR CONTINUOUS USE, A ????? METER |
| | WILL ONLY ALLOW 15 GPM CONTINUOUS USE, A 1??? METER |
| | WILL ONLY ALLOW A 25 GPM CONTINUOUS USE. |
| | I.2. THE IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWS A 1-1/2??? DOUBLE CHECK |
| | BACKFLOW PREVENTER TO BE INSTALLED, THERE IS NO SERVICE |
| | LARGE ENOUGH FOR THIS SIZE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THE |
| | LOCATION SHOWN (NORTH SIDEWALK). THERE IS A 2??? WATER |
| | SERVICE, JUST SOUTH OF THE ALLEY ON THE EAST SIDE OF S. |
| | ROSEMARY, IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THIS SERVICE BE USED IF |
| | THE ZONE FLOWS ARE TO BE KEPT. |
| | C-1 PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: |
| | C-1.1. NORTH GATE ARM EXTENDS INTO ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY, |
| | MOVE IT NORTH. |
| | C-1.2. THERE IS NO WAY IN OR OUT OF THE NORTH PARKING |
| | LOT FOR A PEDESTRIAN, ADD SIDEWALK OUT TO THE CITY |
| | SIDEWALK, ???LIKE??? ON THE SOUTH SIDE. |
| | C-1.3. CHECK THE ZONING REGS, I BELIEVE THAT THERE HAS |
| | TO BE A GREEN SPACE BETWEEN EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES. |
| | C-1.4. IN THE NORTH PARKING LOT AT THE NW, NE, AND SE |
| | CORNERS OF THE LOT, IT APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH |
| | VEHICLES PARKING, THEY LOOK LIKE THEY WILL HIT EACH |
| | OTHER. IN THE SW PARKING SPACE, IT APPEARS THE PARKED |
| | VEHICLE WILL PARTIALLY BLOCK THE EXIT LANE. THE PROBLEM |
| | APPEARS TO EXIST IN THE SOUTH LOT ALSO. |
| | C-1.5. THE STORM WATER DESIGN WILL NOT WORK, IT WILL |
| | OVERFLOW INTO THE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST DURING A 25 |
| | YEAR RAIN EVENT AND THIS CAN NOT BE ALLOWED. |
| | C-1.6. THE SWALES CAN NOT BE USED TO DIRECT THE FLOW OF |
| | WATER, NOT WHEN THE SWALES ARE FULL OF HEDGES AND |
| | FILLED WITH MULCH. REDESIGN. |
| | C-1.7. WHO HAS RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE TWO PARKING |
| | LOTS AND THE ALLEY? ADD STOPS SIGNS, STOP BARS TO THE |
| | PLAN. |
| | C-1.8. ADD STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR TO THE ALLEY WHERE |
| | THE PARKING LOT EMPTIES INTO ROSEMARY. |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN: |
| | E.1. PLAN SHOWS ELECTRICAL METER AND PANEL IN CENTER OF |
| | ALLEY, RELOCATE OUT OF ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | |
| 2009-09-09 09:58:29 | RESPOND TO; |
| | DEAN LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR |
| | W-494-1083, F-1116, [email protected] |
| | |
