| Date |
Text |
| 2009-09-18 17:44:21 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. |
| | NOTE THAT NEW COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED BASED ON |
| | REVISED PLANS AND NEW INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 2) THE COMMENT RESPONSE FROM GEORGE FRAKER, DATED |
| | SEPTEMBER 7, 2009, DID NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESS THE |
| | ZONING COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER VALUES THE STRUCTURES ON SITE AT $184,588. |
| | THE LISTED PERMIT VALUE IS $136,206. BECAUSE THE VALUE |
| | OF THE PERMIT EXCEEDS 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE, A LANDSCAPE PLAN, MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS AND PREPARED BY A REGISTERED LANDSCAPE |
| | ARCHITECT, IS REQUIRED. ANY DEFICIENCIES ARE REQUIRED |
| | TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE |
| | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 3) THIS PERMIT SEEMS TO BE AN ATTEMPT AT RE-ACTIVATING |
| | AN EXPIRED PERMIT THAT HAD SOME LEVEL OF WORK DONE. THE |
| | SUBMITTED PLANS WITH 2005 STAMPS DO NOT INCLUDE A STAMP |
| | THAT SHOWS THAT THE SPECIFIC 2005 PLANS WERE APPROVED |
| | BY ZONING. WHILE THE PERMIT RECORD DOES SHOW ZONING |
| | APPROVED A PERMIT IN FEBRUARY OF 2005, IT IS YOUR |
| | OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE PLAN |
| | APPROVED BY ZONING INCLUDED THE ITEMS LISTED IN #6 AND |
| | #7 BELOW, OR THE REVISED PLANS SHALL REMOVE THE ROOFED |
| | PORCH/VERANDA ADDITION AND THE NEW EXTENDED A/C SPACE |
| | ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE "EXISTING" SITE PLAN SHOWS THE |
| | NEW WORK. TITLE IS MISLEADING. IF IN FACT THE "NEW |
| | WORK" WAS FINALLED, THEN NEW PLANS SHALL SHOW THIS AS |
| | EXISTING AND NOT NEW. |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: NO NORTH ARROW IS PROVIDED ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE NEW ROOFED PORCH/VERANDA |
| | ADDITION ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET FROM |
| | THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 7) REPEAT COMMENT: THE NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE |
| | CONTAINING THE NON-CONFORMING USE (TOO MUCH DENSITY) |
| | MAY NOT ADD SQUARE FOOTAGE, SPECIFICALLY THE NEW |
| | EXTENDED A/C SPACE PROPOSED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING. THE BUILDING MAY BE ENLARGED ONLY IF IT IS |
| | RECONSTRUCTED AS A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE. |
| | |
| | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS STATE THAT A TREE IS BEING |
| | REMOVED. THIS REQUIRES A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. THE |
| | CANOPY VALUE OF THE REMOVED TREE SHALL BE REPLACED ON |
| | SITE. PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | @ (561) 822-1462, FOR DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: ELEVATIONS SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS |
| | NORTH, SOUTH, ETC. NOT RIGHT OR LEFT. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
