| Date |
Text |
| 2010-03-24 15:29:42 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE MINOR AMENDMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE REVISIONS HAS |
| | NOT BEEN APPROVED BY ZONING. ZONING WILL NOT APPROVE |
| | THIS PERMIT UNTIL THE MINOR AMENDMENT IS APPROVED. |
| | |
| | 2) THERE HAVE BEEN MANY PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE |
| | APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. LISTED BELOW ARE THE |
| | IDENTIFIED CHANGES AND STAFF'S DISPOSITION TO THE |
| | CHANGES BASED ON THE 3/22/10 MEETING: |
| | |
| | A. THE SABAL PALMS W/UNDER PLANTING REQUIRED TO PROVIDE |
| | ADDITIONAL BUFFERING AGAINST ANDROS ILES NORTH OF THE |
| | MULCH PATH HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED. THESE BUFFERS WERE |
| | REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT APPROVAL. 3/22/10 |
| | MEETING AGREEMENT - SLASH PINE TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED |
| | WITH AN UNDER PLANTING OF SAW PALMETTO AND FAKAHATCHEE |
| | GRASS AS SHOWN IN THE TWO LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS |
| | APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 20, 2008. |
| | |
| | B. THE SABAL PALMS TO SHADE THE MULCH PATH HAVE BEEN |
| | ELIMINATED. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - STAFF |
| | RECOMMENDS THAT TREES OR PALMS BE INSTALLED ALONG THE |
| | PATH TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR PATH USERS. THIS IS A |
| | PREFERRED LOCATION FOR MITIGATION TREES. |
| | |
| | C. STAFF SUPPORTS THE SUBSTITUTION OF SHADE TREES AT |
| | THE PLAY AREA. THESE MAY REQUIRE ROOT BARRIERS. |
| | |
| | D. THE SABAL PALMS IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE |
| | WERE REMOVED WITH THE DUMPSTER. 3/22/10 MEETING |
| | AGREEMENT - STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TREES OR PALMS BE |
| | INSTALLED IN THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | E. THE SABAL PALMS IN THE NORTHERN TERMINAL ISLAND OF |
| | THE CLUB HOUSE HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND SHALL BE SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLANS AND INSTALLED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | F. THE PROPOSED PLANS DO NOT SHOW LANDSCAPE IN THE OPEN |
| | AREA NORTH OF BUILDING #6. LANDSCAPE ADJACENT TO ANDROS |
| | ILES WAS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT APPROVAL. |
| | THERE ARE SOME RELOCATED PALMS CURRENTLY LOCATED IN THE |
| | GENERAL VICINITY THAT WERE INSTALLED ON A TEMPORARY |
| | BASIS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - INSTEAD OF |
| | RELOCATING THEM AGAIN, THEY SHOULD BE LEFT IN PLACE |
| | WITH THE UNDER PLANTING SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| | THE REVISED PLANS SHALL ACCURATELY SHOW THE EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS. NOTE: THE DEAD PALMS SHALL BE REMOVED AND |
| | REPLACED MEETING CANOPY REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS |
| | (CALCULATED BY DBH). |
| | |
| | G. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO ANDROS ILES HAS |
| | BEEN CHANGED. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE INSTALLATION |
| | OF ADDITIONAL SABAL PALMS IN THE BUFFER AREA. STAFF IS |
| | CONCERNED THAT THE RELOCATED FICUS RUBIGINOSA (RUSTY |
| | FIG) TREE WILL GROW LARGE AND WILL SQUEEZE OUT THE |
| | OTHER TREES AND PALMS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 3/22/10 |
| | MEETING AGREEMENT - IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE |
| | DEVELOPER AND LATER THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO |
| | REPLACE THE CANOPY VALUE OF ANY TREES AND PALMS WHICH |
| | DIE. |
| | |
| | H. THE TREES AND PALMS IN THE OPEN AREA NORTH OF |
| | BUILDING #5 WERE MOVED INTO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. |
| | 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TREES |
| | OR PALMS BE INSTALLED IN THIS LOCATION TO PROVIDE |
| | ADDITIONAL SCREENING FOR ANDROS ISLE. |
| | |
| | I. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD HAS BEEN CHANGED. STAFF AGREES WITH MOVING |
| | THE TREES BACK TO AVOID THE FPL LINES. THE PROPOSED |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOWS RELOCATED PALM TREES IN THE THREE |
| | EASEMENTS WHICH CROSS THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THIS IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES AND THE CITY AS THE PLAT DEDICATES |
| | THESE AREAS AS UTILITY EASEMENTS. NOTE: THE FPL LETTER, |
| | DATED JULY 24, 2009, ADDRESSES THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE |
| | PALM TREES TO THE EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES AND NOT THE |
| | PLACEMENT OF THE PALMS WITHIN THE EASEMENTS. |
| | |
| | J. THE SABAL PALMS IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE |
| | WERE REMOVED WITH THE DUMPSTER. 3/22/10 MEETING |
| | AGREEMENT - STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TREES OR PALMS BE |
| | INSTALLED IN THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | K. THE RELOCATED SABAL PALMS ARE BEING REPLACED BY |
| | SIGNIFICANTLY FEWER GROUPS OF NEW SABAL PALMS BETWEEN |
| | THE BUILDINGS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - STAFF DOES |
| | NOT OBJECT TO THIS CHANGE PROVIDED THAT THE OVERALL |
| | TREE CANOPY REMAINS. |
| | |
| | L. THE ENTRY DRIVE LANDSCAPE HAS CHANGES, INCLUDING THE |
| | RELOCATION OF FIG TREES, WHICH WERE NOT SHOWN ON THE |
| | ORIGINAL PLANT INVENTORY, AND THE USE OF NEW NOT |
| | RELOCATED SABAL PALMS AND OAKS. 3/22/10 MEETING |
| | AGREEMENT - STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS CHANGE |
| | PROVIDED THAT THE OVERALL TREE CANOPY REMAINS AND THE |
| | REVISED PLANS REFLECT ACCURATE CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | M. THE PROPOSED PLANS NO LONGER SHOW SABAL PALMS NORTH |
| | OF THE LIFT STATION. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - THE |
| | REVISED PLANS SHALL ACCURATELY SHOW THE VEGETATION |
| | AROUND THE LIFT STATION. NOTE: ANY EXOTICS TO BE |
| | REMOVED AND ANY TREES WHICH MEET MINIMUM CITY STANDARDS |
| | MAY BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE CANOPY PRESERVATION |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | N. THE PROPOSED PLANS SHOW 54 RELOCATED SABAL PALMS IN |
| | THE OAK PRESERVE AREA ON THE OAKTON COMMONS COMMERCIAL |
| | PARCEL. STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE PLANTING IS TOO |
| | DENSE AND WILL NOT FOSTER LONG TERM SUSTAINABILITY OF |
| | EITHER THE OAK TREES OR THE SABAL PALMS. 3/22/10 |
| | MEETING AGREEMENT - PROVIDE A LETTER FROM OAKTON |
| | COMMONS COMMERCIAL APPROVING THE RELOCATION TO THIS |
| | LOCATION AND THAT OAKTON COMMONS COMMERCIAL IS |
| | RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE TREES AND PALMS, INCLUDING |
| | THE CANOPY REPLACEMENT VALUE OF ANY TREES OR PALMS |
| | WHICH DIE. NOTE: ANY DEAD TREES OR PALMS SHALL BE |
| | REMOVED AND REPLACED MEETING CANOPY REPLACEMENT |
| | REQUIREMENTS (CALCULATED BY DBH). |
| | |
| | O. THE 13 RELOCATED SABAL PALMS ALONG THE EASTERN EDGE |
| | OF THE BANK PARCEL ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE CORRECT |
| | LOCATION. THEY SHALL BE SHOWN IN THEIR TRUE LOCATION. |
| | |
| | P. ALL OAKS SHALL BE CORRECTLY LABELED AS EITHER LAUREL |
| | OR LIVE SPECIES. |
| | |
| | 3) MANY OF THE RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WERE PLANTED |
| | WITH THE ROOT BALL BELOW THE SURROUNDING GRADE. STAFF |
| | IS CONCERNED THAT THE PLANTING DEPTH DOES NOT FOSTER |
| | LONG TERM SUSTAINABILITY OF THE TREES AND PALMS. |
| | 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF |
| | THE DEVELOPER AND LATER THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO |
| | REPLACE THE CANOPY VALUE OF ANY TREES AND PALMS WHICH |
| | DIE. |
| | |
| | 4) THE RELOCATED TREES NEED TO BE TRIMMED UNDER THE |
| | SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST (OBSERVED DURING |
| | SITE VISIT). |
| | |
| | 5) THE EXISTING TREES ALONG THE WEST AND NORTH SIDES OF |
| | THE LAKE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AS THEY ARE PART |
| | OF OAKTON PRESERVE. ANY DEAD TREES SHALL BE REPLACED. |
| | THE WORK ON THE LAKE BANK HAS ALTERED THE RELATIONSHIP |
| | OF THE BASES OF THE TREES TO THE SURROUNDING GRADE. ANY |
| | NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE TO ENSURE LONG TERM |
| | SUSTAINABILITY. |
| | |
| | 6) ANY TREES SHOWN AS EXISTING OR PROPOSED ON THE PLANS |
| | THAT HAVE DIED SHALL BE REPLACED AT AN EQUAL CANOPY |
| | VALUE (CALCULATED BY DBH). |
| | |
| | 7) A REVISED TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED |
| | CORRECTLY REFLECTING ALL CHANGES. |
| | |
| | 8) THE NEWLY INSTALLED FENCING ALONG THE ANDROS ISLE |
| | PROPERTY BOUNDARY REQUIRES A PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 9) THE ENTRYWAY BETWEEN UNITS 57 AND 58 WERE NOT |
| | CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING THE APPROVED SITE PLANS, |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SURVEYS (BOTH IN ZONING AND |
| | BUILDING PERMIT). THE DIFFERENCES ARE NOT REFLECTED ON |
| | THIS SET OF SUBMITTED PLANS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT |
| | - ZONING WILL ACCEPT A PLAN FOR EITHER OR BOTH OPTIONS |
| | AS PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT, BUT THE BUILDING PERMIT |
| | PLANS NEED TO BE ACCURATE WITH WHAT IS INSTALLED AT |
| | TIME OF INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 10) THE TRANSFORMER BETWEEN LOTS 55 AND 56 IS NOT SHOWN |
| | ON THE APPROVED SITE PLANS, LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SURVEYS |
| | (BOTH IN ZONING AND BUILDING PERMIT). THERE APPEAR TO |
| | BE A NUMBER OF PADS BEING POURED FOR FUTURE |
| | TRANSFORMERS. 3/22/10 MEETING AGREEMENT - ZONING WILL |
| | ACCEPT SHEET RLP-11 AS THE MASTER GUIDE, BUT ALL |
| | BUILDING PERMIT PLANS NEED TO ACCURATELY SHOW THE |
| | CONDITIONS THAT ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| | |