| Date |
Text |
| 2009-12-16 15:29:07 | |
| | ** DENIED ** |
| | |
| | **** IMPORTANT** |
| | 1) NOTE: AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY THE BREAKERS WHICH ARE IN |
| | THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE NOT RATED |
| | FOR THE AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT NEED TO BE CHANGED OUT. |
| | THIS IS A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HAZARD. THIS OFFICE HAS |
| | SEEN FAULTS ON ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS WHICH HAVE RESULTED |
| | IN FIRE, INJURY AND LOSS OF LIFE. THESE CAN BE CHANGED |
| | OUT UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS |
| | FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE SUBMIT PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AND SPECS/CUT SHEETS ON BREAKERS AND PERMIT |
| | WILL BE DONE ON A TURN AROUND BASIS. NOTICE HAS BEEN |
| | GIVEN IN PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NO PERMIT APPLICATION HAS |
| | BEEN MADE TO RESOLVE SAFETY CONCERNS. THE NEXT STEP |
| | WILL BE TO ISSUE CORRECTION NOTICE TO STORE LOCATION. |
| | PLEASE OBTAIN PERMIT AND CHANGE OUT BREAKERS AS SOON AS |
| | POSSIBLE. THE DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SOURCE BASED ON |
| | LIFE SAFETY CONCERNS IS POSSIBLE IF THIS IS NOT DONE IN |
| | A TIMELY FASHION. PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER TO ALLEVIATE |
| | ANY POSSIBLE DELAYS. NEC 110.9 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: AS GONE OVER WITH THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, |
| | SHEET S6.3 CONTAINS THE OLD SEAL WITH THE WORDING |
| | *CERTIFICATE* INSTEAD OF THE NEW SEAL. A NEW SHEET IS |
| | TO BE REPLACED INTO SETS. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT ALL |
| | ORIGINALS. IN FACT ONLY ONE SET SUBMITTED CONTAINS THE |
| | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS. |
| | THE OTHER TWO REQUIRED COPIES ARE ACTUALLY PHOTO-COPIES |
| | OF THE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINALS. THE CERTIFICATION |
| | SHEETS ARE ALL REQUIRED TO CONTAIN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, |
| | DATE AND SEAL. |
| | FAC 61G15-23.002, FS471.025 |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: THE SUBMITTED ENERGY PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS |
| | CONTAIN A SIGNATURE FROM THE PERSON WHO PREPARED |
| | DOCUMENTS NOT AS ONE OF THE LICENSED DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS LISTED ON PROJECT. THE ONLY PERSON |
| | PERMITTED TO PREPARE DOCUMENTS IS THAT LISTED AS THE |
| | LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS REQUIRED UNDER FBC |
| | 13-103.1, FS 471.005. FS 481.221, FAC 61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE CODE SECTIONS FOR |
| | REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS. RESPONSE STATES THE CODE IS |
| | MET HOWEVER BASED ON THE PLANS AND RESPONSE THERE IS |
| | STILL SOME ITEMS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. FBC |
| | 13-415.AB1.1 FIRST REQUIRES *ALL* LIGHTING IN BUILDING |
| | GREATER THAN 5K SQ FT TO BE AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED. |
| | THE CODE DOES GIVE DIFFERENT WAYS IN DOING THIS AND |
| | SOME EXCEPTIONS. HOWEVER THE INTENT OF THE ENERGY CODE |
| | IS TO SAVE ENERGY BY TURNING OFF ALL LIGHTING. |
| | |
| | SECTION 13-415.AB.1.2 REQUIRES EACH SPACE TO HAVE ITS |
| | OWN MANUAL CONTROL TO BE CAPABLE OF OVER RIDING ANY |
| | TIME OF DAY SCHEDULING SYSTEM OR IT MAY BE A SEPARATE |
| | CONTROL FOR SPACE SUCH AS TIMED OR OCCUPANCY SENSORS. |
| | IN EITHER CASE THIS DOES NOT MEAN INDIVIDUAL MANUAL |
| | CONTROL SUCH AS SINGLE POLE SWITCHES. |
| | SUCH LOCATIONS WOULD BE THE JANITOR CLOSET, MEAT |
| | COOLER, PRODUCE COOLER, MEAT PREP, UTILITY ROOM, |
| | PHOTO-LAB AREA, ROTISSERIE PREP, AND BAKER FREEZER. |
| | ** ALL SPACES. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED TO INDICATE WHETHER |
| | OR NOT THE CONTINUOUS LOADS ARE ALREADY FIGURED AT |
| | 125%. THE RESPONSE STATES SOME INFORMATION ABOUT THE |
| | AIR CURTAIN FOR THE DOORS. THIS WAS NOT PART OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT. |
| | PLEASE SEE 215.3, 230.42 ETC FOR ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS |
| | WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN AND FIGURED AT 125%. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: COVER SHEET STATES A 2006 FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE. THIS COULD BE REDLINED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.AB.5, 13-415.AB.2.2 FOR |
| | EXTERIOR PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS FOR PRESCRIPTIVE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE INPUT DATA REPORT |
| | CAN BE BLANK FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING WHEN THERE IS NEW |
| | LIGHTING BEING INSTALLED ON PLANS? |
| | |
| | ** COMMENTS: 1,2,3,4 AND 8 4 MUST BE ADDRESSED AT THIS |
| | TIME. COMMENTS #5 AND 6 CAN BE DONE AS A PROVISO WHICH |
| | WOULD ALLOW ISSUANCE OF PERMIT AND GIVE DESIGN TEAM |
| | TIME TO REVISE PLANS WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIME FRAME. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
