| Date |
Text |
| 2009-11-17 17:15:07 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE XERISCAPE TABULATION NECESSARY |
| | FOR THE EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF |
| | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 2. SUBMIT A COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST |
| | OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LABOR, BROKEN DOWN INTO |
| | UNIT COST. |
| | |
| | 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-445 (4)(K), FICUS SPECIES MAY |
| | BE PLANTED AS INDIVIDUAL TREES PROVIDED THAT THEY ARE |
| | NO CLOSER THAN 15 FEET OF ANY STRUCTURE OR UTILITY. THE |
| | PROPOSED TREES ALONG THE WEST PERIMETER OF THE SITE |
| | SHALL BE CHANGED TO ANOTHER SPECIES. |
| | |
| | 4. ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, PLEASE SHOW ALL UTILITIES, |
| | OVERHEAD LINES, EASEMENTS, OVERAHANGING TREE LIMBS FROM |
| | NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AND ANYTHING ELSE THAT MAY |
| | INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 5. THE GATES ON THE EAST PERIMETER OF THE SITE APPEAR |
| | TO SWING OUT ONTO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | ALSO, STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE PROPOSED PERIMETER |
| | HEDGE BE PLANTED ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE FENCE WHEN |
| | THE FENCE IS ADJACENT TO THE STREET. |
| | |
| | 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (D)(2), THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN SHALL CONTAIN THE ITEMS LISTED IN THIS SECTION, |
| | INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO A PLANT LIST. |
| | |
| | 7. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TREES BE MORE EVENLY |
| | DISTTIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE SITE, RATHER THAN ALL BEING |
| | PLANTED IN ONE LINE. |
| | |
| | 8. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED IF ANY EXISTING |
| | TREES WILL BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. IF ANY TREES WILL |
| | BE REMOVED, MITIGATION IS REQUIRED. THERE CAN BE NO NET |
| | LOSS OF TREE CANOPY. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT |
| | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462, |
