| Date |
Text |
| 2009-07-21 14:11:52 | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS |
| | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SIGNED AND SEALED SITE PLAN |
| | OR A SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | ADDITION AND DISTANCES TO THE PROPERTY LINES. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET 1 OF THE PLANS SPECIFIES THE SCOPE OF WORK AS |
| | A LEVEL 2 ALTERATION. THIS IS INCORRECT. THE PROJECT IS |
| | A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION AND AN ADDITION. |
| | |
| | 3) THE VALUE SPECIFIED FOR THE PROJECT ON THE |
| | APPLICATION IS LOW AND HAS BEEN ADJUSTED BASED ON ICC |
| | VALUATION TABLES. ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEES ARE OWED. |
| | |
| | 4) THE WINDOW BUCK DETAIL ON SHEET 5 DOES NOT SPECIFY |
| | THE FASTENERS OR SPACING FOR ATTACHING THE BUCKS TO THE |
| | MASONRY OPENINGS. PLEASE SPECIFY ATTACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 5) THE DOOR BUCK DETAIL ON SHEET 5 DOES NOT INDICATE |
| | THE ATTACHMENT OF THE BUCK TO THE MASONRY OPENING. |
| | PLEASE SPECIFY THE ATTACHMENTS. ALSO THE DOOR JAMB TO |
| | BUCK ATTACHMENT IS SPECIFIED WITH 8D NAILS AND THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFIES SCREWS. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 6) SPECIFY THE REQUIRED LOADS FOR THE FLOOR TRUSSES ON |
| | THE PLANS. FBC R 301.4 AND R301.5. |
| | |
| | 7) FBC R803.2.3.1 REQUIRES THE ROOF SHEATHING TO BE |
| | FASTENED WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS. PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | NOTES ON THE WALL SECTION ON SHEET 5 OF THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8) SPECIFY THE INSULATION ON THE WALL SECTION AT THE |
| | MASONRY WALL AND AT THE EXTERIOR WALL AT THE FLOOR |
| | TRUSSES. FBC 13-600 |
| | |
| | 9) THE ROOF LOADS SPECIFIED ON SHEET 1 DO NOT MATCH THE |
| | ONES ON THE TRUSS DRAWINGS. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 10) WHERE STUCCO IS TO BE APPLIED TO LATH OVER FRAME |
| | CONSTRUCTION A BOND BREAK IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE |
| | WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER AND THE STUCCO PER FBC |
| | R703.6.3. SPECIFY TWO LAYERS OF APPROVED |
| | WATER-RESISTANT BARRIER (ASPHALT FELT) OR OTHER |
| | APPROVED METHOD OR MATERIALS. |
| | |
| | 11) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | GAF SHINGLES FL183 IS FOR THE 2001 FBC AND IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE FOR THE CURRENT CODE WHICH IS THE 2007 FBC. |
| | ALSO THE NOA # 06-0331.12 FOR THE SHINGLES IS CLOSED. |
| | SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES. DCA RULE 9B-72 |
| | |
| | 12) THE FL PRODUCT APPROVAL COVERSHEET FOR THE SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOWS IS FOR THE 2004 FBC AND IS NOT ACCEPTABLE |
| | FOR THE CURRENT CODE WHICH IS THE 2007 FBC. HOWEVER, |
| | THE MIAMI DADE NOA THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS CURRENT AND |
| | ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT THE FL COVERSHEET. |
| | |
| | 13) THE TRUSS LAYOUT AND DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO |
| | BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW FOR SINGLE FAMILY |
| | RESIDENCES. HOWEVER, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO |
| | THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AT THE ROOF FRAMING INSPECTION. |
| | BECAUSE THE TRUSS INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED IT WAS |
| | REVIEWED AND A NUMBER OF DEFICIENCIES WERE FOUND AS |
| | FOLLOWS. THE TRUSS LAYOUT AND DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | HAVE THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE TRUSS ENGINEER PER |
| | FS471. SIGNATURE STAMPS AND COPIES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | THE ROOF LOADS DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE PLANS. THE |
| | BOTTOM CORD LIVE LOAD FOR THE ROOF TRUSSES IS REQUIRED |
| | TO BE A MINIMUM OF 10 PSF PER FBC R301.5. THE LOADS ARE |
| | NOT SPECIFIED ON THE TRUSS LAYOUT. THE TRUSS DRAWINGS |
| | ARE MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION SUCH AS UPLIFT, |
| | WINDSPEED, DESIGN CRITERIA, ETC. PAGE 8 OF THE TRUSS |
| | DRAWINGS SPECIFIES THE WRONG EDITION OF ASCE 7, WHICH |
| | SHOULD BE ASCE 7-05 FOR THE 2007 FBC. PAGE 1 LISTS THE |
| | TRUSS DESIGN PER IBC NOT FBC. PLEASE CORRECT THE |
| | DEFICIENCIES BEFORE TRUSS DRAWINGS ARE GIVEN TO THE |
| | BUILDING INSPECTOR AT THE ROOF FRAMING INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
