| Date |
Text |
| 2009-12-08 19:42:36 | FAILED |
| | |
| | REVISED NOTE: THE PLANS SHOW WORK ON 3 PARCELS - BANK, |
| | COMMERCIAL AND ENTRY ROAD - EACH HAVING A DISTINCT PCN. |
| | PER ROBERT BROWN, ASSISTANT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| | DIRECTOR, A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE WORK ON EACH PARCEL (SAME SET OF |
| | PLANS MAY BE USED FOR ALL THREE PERMITS). ZONING WILL |
| | NOT APPROVE THE PERMIT FOR THE BANK BUILDING UNTIL THE |
| | PERMITS FOR THE SITE WORK AND LANDSCAPE ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | NOTE: THE PLANS (FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS, FOUNDATION) |
| | FOR THE BANK ITSELF ARE OK FOR ZONING. ONCE COMMENTS |
| | 1A, 1E, AND SEPARATE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PERMITS ARE |
| | SUBMITTED, ZONING CAN APPROVE THE PERMIT FOR THE BANK |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS FROM ORDINANCE NO. 4162-08 HAVE BEEN MET: |
| | (PLEASE NOTE THAT ACKNOWLEDGING THE COMMENT IS NOT THE |
| | SAME AS PROVIDING THE EVIDENCE THAT THE CONDITION IS |
| | SATISFIED) |
| | |
| | A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE |
| | INTERSECTION OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND BENOIST FARMS |
| | ROAD, UPON MEETING THE WARRANTS IDENTIFIED IN THE |
| | LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL |
| | DEVICES (MUTCD). THE TRAFFIC DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED |
| | DURING PEAK SEASON OR ADJUSTED TO PEAK SEASON |
| | CONDITIONS BASED ON PALM BEACH COUNTY CRITERIA FOR TWO |
| | (2) CONSECUTIVE YEARS AFTER THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF |
| | OCCUPANCY FOR THE OAKTON COMMONS CPD IS ISSUED. PRIOR |
| | TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE |
| | FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITHIN THE OAKTON COMMONS CPD |
| | FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE, THE DEVELOPER |
| | SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT ANY |
| | REQUIRED BOND HAS BEEN POSTED AND A PUBLIC FACILITIES |
| | AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED WITH THE COUNTY. IF A BOND |
| | AND/OR PUBLIC FACILITIES AGREEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED, |
| | THEN IT SHALL BE STATED IN THE WRITTEN VERIFICATION |
| | FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | B. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY |
| | FOR ANY NEW BUILDING(S) WITHIN THE OAKTON COMMONS CPD, |
| | THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING EXCLUSIVE |
| | TURN LANES AT THE PROJECT ACCESS DRIVEWAYS, WHERE NOT |
| | EXISTING, WHICH SERVICE THE NEW BUILDING(S) FROM THE |
| | REQUIRED TURN LANE(S): |
| | |
| | 1. EXCLUSIVE WEST BOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE ALONG |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD, ONTO THE PROJECT ACCESS AT THE |
| | INTERSECTION OF BENOIST FARMS ROAD. |
| | 2. EXCLUSIVE EAST BOUND LEFT-TURN LANE ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD, ONTO THE PROJECT ACCESS AT THE INTERSECTION |
| | OF BENOIST FARMS ROAD. |
| | 3. WEST BOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD, ONTO THE WESTERN PROJECT ACCESS LOCATION. |
| | 4. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS, IF |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE TURN LANE(S) IS INCLUDED IN THE |
| | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | CONTRACT TO WIDEN OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD, THE CITY SHALL |
| | NOT DELAY THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY |
| | SOLELY BECAUSE THE FDOT/COUNTY ROAD CONTRACTOR HAS NOT |
| | COMPLETED INSTALLATION OF THE TURN LANE(S) PRIOR TO THE |
| | DEVELOPER'S REQUEST FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | C. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY'S PLANNING AND |
| | ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTATION FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | OR THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT THE |
| | EXCLUSIVE TURN LANE(S) HAS BEEN BUILT TO THE APPLICABLE |
| | STANDARDS OR EVIDENCE THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TURN |
| | LANE(S) IS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT TO WIDEN OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BY FDOT/COUNTY'S |
| | CONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | D. PROOF PROVIDED |
| | |
| | E. PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT |
| | FOR THE COMMERCIAL POD, THE DEVELOPER SHALL RECORD AN |
| | EASEMENT TO ALLOW FOR JOINT USE OF THE COMMERCIAL |
| | PARKING FOR PARK AND RIDE PURPOSES. THE EASEMENT |
| | LANGUAGE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING |
| | AND ZONING DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY |
| | ATTORNEY PRIOR TO RECORDATION. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS FROM THE APRIL 23, 2009, BANK MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT APPROVAL LETTER HAVE BEEN MET: (PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT ACKNOWLEDGING THE COMMENT IS NOT THE SAME AS |
| | PROVIDING THE EVIDENCE THAT THE CONDITION IS SATISFIED) |
| | |
| | A. CONDITION MET |
| | |
| | B. THE EAST SIDE OF THE ENTRY ROAD WITHIN TRACT A SHALL |
| | BE PLANTED WITH MATERIAL CONSISTENT WITH THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PROPOSED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ENTRY ROAD. THE |
| | SPECIFIC MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND |
| | ZONING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND REFLECTED |
| | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. **THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT ADDRESSES THIS CONDITION, BUT |
| | THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DO |
| | NOT MATCH THE MINOR AMENDMENT PLANS.** |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE A NUMBER OF DISCREPANCIES |
| | AMONG THE LATEST PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND |
| | ZONING DEPARTMENT AND THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PERMIT. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES AMONG THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS |
| | PART OF THE PERMIT. ALL PLANS SHALL BE INTERNALLY |
| | CONSISTENT AS WELL AS BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS |
| | APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. SAMPLE |
| | OF INCONSISTENCIES IDENTIFIED BELOW: |
| | |
| | A. CORRECTED |
| | |
| | B. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS DIFFERENT LANDSCAPE AROUND |
| | THE BUILDING AND THE SIGN THAN WHAT WAS APPROVED BY |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING. ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE CHANGES ON |
| | THE EAST, NORTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE SITE AND DUE TO |
| | THE RELOCATED WATER MAIN. THESE CHANGES REQUIRE THE |
| | APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. |
| | **THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT ADDRESSES THIS CONDITION, BUT THE PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DO NOT MATCH |
| | THE MINOR AMENDMENT PLANS.** |
| | |
| | C. CORRECTED |
| | |
| | D. CORRECTED |
| | |
| | E. CORRECTED |
| | |
| | F. CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE THAT CHANGES TO THE PLANS WILL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT. **A MINOR AMENDMENT WAS SUBMITTED. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT DO NOT MATCH |
| | THE MINOR AMENDMENT LANDSCAPE PLANS (LANDSCAPE COUNTS |
| | AND LAYOUT). THE STRIPING ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DRIVE |
| | AISLE ON SP.1 DOES NOT MATCH THE MINOR AMENDMENT SITE |
| | AND CIVIL PLANS.** |
| | |
| | 5) ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 6) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 7) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE |
| | TREES THAT WILL BE RELOCATED INTO THE 50 FOOT NATURAL |
| | AREA BUFFER ADJACENT TO RIVERWALK. THE SITE WAS CLEARED |
| | DUE TO EXCESSIVE EXOTICS AND THUS NOW IS NO LONGER IN A |
| | NATURAL BUFFER STATE. **THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT ADDRESSES THIS COMMENT, BUT |
| | THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DO |
| | NOT MATCH THE MINOR AMENDMENT PLANS.** |
| | |
| | 9) CORRECTED PLEASE NOTE THAT AN IRRIGATION PERMIT IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 11) ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 12) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 13) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 14) PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE |
| | FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE BANK: |
| | |
| | A. THE REQUIRED PARK AND RIDE SIGNAGE SHALL BE |
| | INSTALLED. NOTE: THESE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SIGN |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | B. EASEMENTS SHALL BE GRANTED TO THE CITY FOR THE WATER |
| | METERS WITHIN THE PARCEL BOUNDARIES. |
| | |
| | C. SUBMITTED WITH MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | |
| | 15) ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 16) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 17) REPEAT COMMENT: TWO LIGHT POST LOCATIONS ALONG THE |
| | PARKING NORTH OF THE FIRE STATION CONFLICT WITH TREE |
| | LOCATIONS. **THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT ADDRESSES THIS COMMENT, BUT THE PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DO NOT MATCH |
| | THE MINOR AMENDMENT PLANS.** |
| | |
| | 18) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 19) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW GENERATOR WILL REQUIRE A |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT. ADDITIONALLY, THE GENERATOR AND THE |
| | MOUNT MAY NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE MANSARD ROOF. |
| | DETAILS AND CROSS-SECTIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE |
| | TIME OF THE GENERATOR PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 20) CORRECTED |
| | |
| | 21) NEW COMMENT: THE PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS |
| | (SPECIFICALLY SHEET 5 OF 7) SHOW A DIFFERENT ENTRY ROAD |
| | CONDITION (WIDTH AND ALIGNMENT), WEST LINE OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION (PHASE LINE) AND PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAN |
| | THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS OCCURS ON BOTH THE |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT AND BUILDING PERMIT PLANS. |
| | |
| | 22) NEW COMMENT: THE EGRESS WALKWAYS FROM THE DOORS ON |
| | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE |
| | PAVING PLANS. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |