| Date |
Text |
| 2009-07-31 15:45:43 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | *** SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL IN |
| | NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW NOTES BASED ON |
| | REVISED INFORMATION NOW SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | ** IT IS RECOMMENDED A MEETING BE SET UP TO GO OVER |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLANS NOW MENTIONS CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS |
| | INSIDE ALL NEW AND EXISTING SLEEPING ROOMS. PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW DID NOT COMMENT ON THIS. THE COMMENT HAD TO DO |
| | WITH SMOKE ALARMS PER R313.1 AND NFPA-72. PLEASE SEE FS |
| | 553.885 FOR LOCATION OF REQUIRED CARBON MONOXIDE |
| | DETECTOR WHICH IS ACTUALLY WITHIN 10FT LOCATED OUTSIDE |
| | THE SLEEPING ROOM. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LOAD CALCULATIONS, PANEL |
| | SCHEDULES, BREAKERS AND CONDUCTORS FOR A/C EQUIPMENT IS |
| | STILL NOT COORDINATING. LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR EXAMPLE |
| | INDICATE 50AMP BREAKERS WITH #8 AWG CONDUCTORS FOR |
| | CONDENSING UNITS, YET THE ONE NEW CU ON PANEL SCHEDULE |
| | INDICATES #12 AWG WITH A 2-POLE 20AMP BREAKER. PLEASE |
| | LOOK UP THE MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDED OCP AND CIRCUIT |
| | SIZE. |
| | PLEASE SEE ANOTHER CONFLICT WITH MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM |
| | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION, AND CONDUCTORS IS WITH THE TWO |
| | HEAT STRIPS INDICATED ON THE LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS/SCHEDULE. |
| | BOTH THE 7.5 KW AND 4KW HEAT ON LOAD/SCHEDULE STATES #6 |
| | AWG AND 60AMP BREAKER. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR EITHER |
| | ONE. THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW AHU STATES 40AMP |
| | WITH #8 AWG WHICH DOES NOT COORDINATE. IN EITHER CASE |
| | PLEASE SEE 424.3B AND 422.11E3. THE TYPICAL MINIMUM |
| | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION SIZING IS 125% AND THE MAXIMUM |
| | IS 150%. |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO VERIFY THE FACT ONE UNIT IS INDICATING A |
| | 4KW HEAT STRIP, THIS IS NOT KNOWN TO BE TYPICAL. |
| | ***** PLEASE ALSO SEE 422.12,220.60 ETC |
| | A/C LOADS FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS MAY BE DE-RATED HOWEVER |
| | WHEN FIGURING THE LARGER OF THE TWO LOADS, YOU USE THE |
| | ACTUAL LOAD BEFORE DE-RATING NOT THE LOAD AFTER |
| | DE-RATING. |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO CHECK THE KW LOADS SHOWN FOR THE |
| | CONDENSING UNITS, THESE SEEM TO BE HIGH. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEW MADE NOTE TO 210.52D FOR |
| | THE LOCATION OF THE GFI RECEPTACLE IN THE BATHROOM. AN |
| | OCCUPANT IS NOT PERMITTED TO CROSS OVER ONE SINK TO |
| | PLUG IN AN APPLIANCE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF ANOTHER SINK. |
| | THE OPTION IS TO RELOCATE THE ONE GFI TO THE MIDDLE OF |
| | THE TWO SINKS OR TO ADD AND ADDITIONAL GFI RECEPTACLE. |
| | NO RELOCATION WAS DONE AND NO DEVICE WAS ADDED. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PREVIOUS REVIEW MENTIONED THAT THE RISER DID |
| | NOT INDICATE ANY EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS AFTER |
| | THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT. NO CONDUCTORS PER |
| | 250.122, 250.110,250.24 ETC WERE ADDED. |
| | THIS IS ONLY AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PREVIOUS REVIEW MENTIONED 210.12 FOR ARC FAULT |
| | PROTECTION REQUIRED FOR ALL CIRCUITS/OUTLETS IN |
| | BEDROOMS. THIS WAS REVISED IN THE 2002 NEC. THE PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE ONLY INDICATES AFCI PROTECTION ON ONE OF THE |
| | TWO MASTER BEDROOM CIRCUITS. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PREVIOUS REVIEW MENTIONED TO IDENTIFY THE |
| | 3-WAY SWITCH LOCATED ON THE REAR WALL OF THE NEW MASTER |
| | BEDROOM. THE 3-WAY SWITCH ON PLANS DOES NOT GO TO |
| | ANYTHING?? |
| | 220,210,300,310 ETC, |
| | FBC 106.1.1 |
| | SECTIONS GIVEN IN GENERAL AS IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS |
| | IS FOR. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH REQUESTED FOR |
| | ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS TO BE IDENTIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. THE PLANS WERE REVISED TO SHOW THE NEW METER AND |
| | ONE NEW MAIN DISCONNECT HOWEVER THE SECOND DISCONNECT |
| | IS NOT SHOWN. PLEASE SEE 230.72 AS THIS REQUIRES ALL |
| | MAINS TO BE GROUPED. |
| | ALSO 110.26 FOR MINIMUM CLEARANCES. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO NEW |
| | OR EXISTING SMOKE ALARMS IN DWELLING BEING BROUGHT UP |
| | TO THE CURRENT NFPA-72 11.8.3 REQUIREMENTS. THE PLANS |
| | CONTAINS A NOTE HOWEVER AT SOME POINT A BASIC LAYOUT |
| | FOR THE EXISTING DWELLING SHOWING THE LOCATIONS WILL BE |
| | NEEDED. THIS CAN BE PART OF A PROVISO AT A LATER DATE |
| | IF LOCATIONS ARE NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | ** PER NEW BUILDING OFFICIAL, PLANS ARE NO LONGER |
| | RELEASE HOWEVER PER THE IMPACT REVIEW STOP, ONE SET |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED OUT FOR REVIEW AND |
| | STAMPING BY PAL BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT ** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED |
| | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
