| Date |
Text |
| 2009-05-08 16:55:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2007 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY A DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL, FS471, FS481. |
| | |
| | 2. PLANS ARE TO BE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY, TO SCALE, |
| | MINIMUM 1/8". PLANS APPEAR TO BE A REDUCED VERSION OF |
| | FULL SIZE DRAWINGS. THEY ARE TOO SMALL AND DIFFICULT TO |
| | READ, SOME TEXT IS ENTIRELY ILLEGIBLE, WILL NOT |
| | DIGITIZE PROPERLY AND DO NOT MEET THE STANDARD FOR |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FBC*106). |
| | |
| | 3. IS FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIRED ON ANY AFFECTED WALLS |
| | FBC CHAPTER 5, FBC CHAPTER 6, FBC CHAPTER 7? HOW HAS |
| | THIS BEEN DETERMINED? NO INFORMATION REGARDING BUILDING |
| | TYPE, SIZE, DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE (OR ASSUMED |
| | PROPERTY LINE) WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION REGARDING REQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTION TO FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF REPAIRS TO |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS AND DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 5. PLANS SHOW A NEW "TUBE COLUMN," MATERIAL NOT |
| | SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE SPECIFICATION FOR RAILINGS INCLUDING DESIGN |
| | STRENGTH CRITERIA FBC1607, FBC1013. |
| | |
| | 7. PROVIDE A CODE SUMMARY; BUILDING TYPE, SIZE, HEIGHT, |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC 5, FBC 3). |
| | |
| | 8. PLANS STATE THAT SHORING DESIGN WILL BE THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR CANNOT |
| | DO THIS DESIGN; THIS MUST BE DONE BY A STRUCTURAL |
| | ENGINEER OR OTHER LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | QUALIFIED TO DO THIS WORK. |
| | |
| | 9. IT APPEARS THAT THE "RAILING" IS A KNEE WALL. IF THE |
| | RAILING IS A SOLID WALL, WHAT PROVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE |
| | FOR DRAINAGE? NO SLOPE WAS SHOWN ON THE BALCONY. |
| | FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 10. CLARIFY HOW THE POST WILL BE ANCHORED. |
| | |
| | 11. SPEC WELDS, IF APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 12. TWO COAT STUCCO SPECIFIED THROUGHOUT PLAN; THIS |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ASTM 926, FBC2512.1. |
| | |
| | 13. REVISE GOVERNING CODE; INCORRECT CODE DECLARED. |
| | |
| | 14. ALL CONNECTORS ARE TO BE SPECIFIED CONTINUOUS FROM |
| | FOUNDATION THROUGH THE ROOF. FOR INSTANCE, SHEET S3 |
| | SPECIFIES A "LNG. BENT PLATE," WHAT KIND OF PLATE? SPEC |
| | MATERIAL AND THICKNESS, LENGTH AND DIAMETER OF ALL |
| | FASTENERS. |
| | |
| | |
