Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 09020319
Permit Number 09020319
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2009-03-26 08:54:00** DENIED REVIEW **
  
 1) NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT PLANS WERE ONLY
 SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY. THIS DOES NOT *LOCK* A
 PROJECT UNDER ANY SPECIFIC CODE EDITIONS UNLESS PERMIT
 APPLICATION IS MADE. AS THE PROJECT WAS ONLY SUBMITTED
 FOR PLAN REVIEW AND IS DESIGNED UNDER THE 2004 FBC AS
 OF MARCH 1, 2009 THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER FS 553.73
 HAS ADOPTED THE 2007 FBC WITH 2009 REVISIONS.
 PLEASE ALSO KNOW SOME OTHER CODES SUCH AS THE LIFE
 SAFETY CODE AND STATE FIRE CODE WERE ALSO REVISED PER
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 69A-60.003 AND .004 BY THE
 STATE FIRE MARSHAL.
 THE FOLLOWING CODES NEED TO BE ON PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE
 THE FOLLOWING ARE ON ELECTRICAL AS WELL. SOME CODES
 STATED ON PLANS ARE OK AND IN EFFECT. PLEASE BE SURE
 THE FOLLOWING ARE UPDATED ON ALL RELEVANT SHEETS.
  
 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS.
 2006 NFPA-101
 2006 NFPA-1
 2005 NFPA-70 (ALREADY ON COVER)
 2002 NFPA-72 (ALREADY ON BOTH)
 2002 NFPA-110 ( ALREADY ON BOTH)
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FAC 61G1-16.004 AND FLORIDA
 STATUTES 481.219 AS THE ARCHITECTURAL TITLE BLOCKS ARE
 MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION AS WELL AS STATE REQUIRED
 LICENSING.
 MISSING PRINTED NAME OF ARCHITECT
 MISSING PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER OF ARCHITECT
 MISSING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER.
  
 ** THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY
 OTHER TRADES.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13 2007 EDITION WITH
 2009 GLITCH AMENDMENTS. THIS CHAPTER WAS COMPLETELY
 REVISED FROM THE FIRST PRINTING OF THE 2007 FBC. THERE
 ARE SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WHICH WILL AFFECT THIS PROJECT.
  
 ** THERE ARE LOCATIONS WHICH REQUIRE AUTOMATED LIGHTING
 CONTROLS HOWEVER NOT SHOWN ON PLANS PER FBC
 13-415.AB.1,.1.1,.1.2, .1.3.
 ONE EXAMPLE ONLY IS 1-125. THIS IS ONE LOCATION ONLY
 GIVEN AS A BENEFIT. PLEASE BE AWARE THERE ARE MANY
 OTHERS.
  
 ** PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER
 13-415.2, 13-415.AB.5, 13-415.AB.5.1, 13-415.B
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT THE LIGHTNING PROTECTION
 SYSTEM/ADDITION/REWORK WILL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT
 AND PLANS.
  
 5) NOTE: ALL WORKING CLEARANCE SHALL MEET 110.26. BASED
 ON THE NURSE STATION ELEVATION ALONE THERE ARE SEVERAL
 ITEMS WHICH REQUIRE CLEARANCE HOWEVER DO NOT MEET THE
 SECTIONS.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 240.12,700.27, 701.18. PLEASE
 PROVIDE COMPLETE SELECTIVE COORDINATION FOR SYSTEMS
 INCLUDING NEW EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED. THIS STUDY
 NEEDS TO INCLUDE TIME CURVES. SOME INFORMATION SHOWN
 AND SUBMITTED HOWEVER BASED ON E7.01 NOT MATCHING RISER
 COMPLETELY AND NOT TIME CURVES SUBMITTED IT IS NOT
 KNOWN IF MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE IS MET. SEE COMMENT #8
 ALSO.
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 517.17. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE
 BY SHOWING THE PROTECTION OF SYSTEM.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE GO THROUGH RISER, CONDUCTORS AND ALL
 OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICES. THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH
 DO NOT COORDINATE.
 215.5, 110.9, 240.4, 310.16, 240.12 ETC THESE CODE
 SECTIONS ARE GIVEN IN GENERAL AS COORDINATION OF
 CONDUCTORS, OVER CURRENT PROTECTION, PANELS ETC EFFECT
 ALL SECTIONS.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE RISER LINE DIAGRAM, MAIN NDB
 INDICATES A NEW BREAKER TO FEED EDNH. THIS IS SHOWN
 WITH A 125AMP OCP ON THE LINE DIAGRAM YET THE
 COORDINATION STUDY RISER SHOWS THIS BEING A 300AMP
 BREAKER TO THE NEW 300AMP MLO.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE: THE RISER INDICATES THE PANEL BEING FED AS
 NOTED ABOVE AS EDNH, HOWEVER BASED ON THE PANEL
 DESIGNATION ON E7.03 THE PANEL IS MARKED AS EDHN. ONE
 COULD ASSUME THIS IS ONLY A MISPRINT HOWEVER ALL OF
 THESE ITEMS NEED TO COORDINATE.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE: THE LOAD IN EDHN/EDNH EXCEEDS THE 125AMP
 BREAKER FEEDING THIS PANEL BASED ON RISER.
  
 ** THESE ARE TWO EXAMPLES ONLY GIVEN AS A BENEFIT.
 THERE ARE OTHERS.
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW THE TRANSFORMER GROUNDING
 LOCATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE ON RISER THE SIZE OF THE GEC
 AND CONNECTION POINT.
 250.66,250.20,250.30.
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 408.4. THE PANEL SCHEDULES NEED TO
 BE SPECIFIC TO ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY FEED.
 STATING, RECEPTACLES, OR CONSOLE OR OTHER GENERIC TERMS
 IS NOT PERMITTED. THESE NEED TO BE CLEAR TO THE ROOMS
 AND AREAS. FOR EXAMPLE: * RECEPTACLES RM 101, ETC.
 THESE MAY BE ALPHA OR NUMERIC DESIGNATIONS BASED ON
 PLANS.
  
 ** IMPORTANT: AS NOTED ABOVE THE PROJECT WAS NOT
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT UNDER THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE REVISE
 ALL DESIGNS
  
  
  
  
 ** IMPORTANT **
 ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP
 FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE
 ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING.
 DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY
 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS,
 SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED
 INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID
 ANY DELAYS.
  
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT
 TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT THIS REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved