| Date |
Text |
| 2009-02-18 14:15:41 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY ROOF ZONES 2 AND 3 HAVE THE SAME |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, FBC1609. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW HOW YOU???VE |
| | DETERMINED DESIGN PRESSURE OF -39.9 FOR ROOF ZONES 2 |
| | AND 3. TABLE F ON SHEET 7 THEN FURTHER REDUCES THE |
| | UPLIFT PRESSURES TO 30% DUE TO OPEN STRUCTURE, |
| | RESULTING IN A DESIGN PRESSURE OF 20.5. IS THIS FOR |
| | ROOF PRESSURES? IF NOT, WHAT DOES TABLE F APPLY TO? |
| | |
| | 3. WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR RECORD KEEPING PURPOSES |
| | PLEASE INDICATE ALL PERTINENT DETAILS IN INK RATHER |
| | THAN HIGHLIGHTER. YELLOW HIGHLIGHTER DOES NOT APPEAR |
| | WHEN SCANNED. FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 4. 140MPH AND 20.5 HAVE BEEN MARKED ON TABLE F. TABLE D |
| | HAS 20PSF HIGHLIGHTED. PLEASE CLARIFY; HOW HAVE YOU |
| | DETERMINED 20PSF? |
| | |
| | 5. SOME SHEETS SHOW A CONCRETE SLAB, OTHERS SHOW |
| | PAVERS. PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 6. PLANS REFER TO FBC2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS. |
| | GOVERNING CODE SHOULD INCLUDE 2007 |
| | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS; PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 7. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE ???CRESCENT.??? IT |
| | IS DEPICTED GRAPHICALLY, ALONG WITH THE ???CRESCENT |
| | HOLDER,??? BUT NO INFORMATION ABOUT EITHER WAS |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE MARK ALL DETAILS PERTINENT TO THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | 9. SEE FLOOR PLAN; SITE PLAN AND OTHER DETAILS SHOW |
| | THIS AS PARTIALLY FREESTANDING, BUT FLOOR PLAN SHOWS |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS ON TWO SIDES. |
| | |
| | 10. FLOOR PLAN SHOWS SQUARE COLUMNS, STATES POST STYLE: |
| | SQUARE, SHEET 4 HAS ROUND COLUMN CONNECTION |
| | HIGHLIGHTED, SHEET 7 HAS ROUND COLUMN HIGHLIGHTED. |
| | |
| | 11. FLOOR PLAN CONFLICTS WITH SHEET 2. FOUNDATION PLAN |
| | NOT CLEAR. PLANS SHOULD CLEARLY SHOW SCOPE OF WORK, |
| | FBC*106. IT APPEARS THAT SOME DETAILS ARE SPECIFIC TO |
| | THIS JOB, SOME ARE GENERIC ENGINEERING, BUT NOT ENOUGH |
| | DETAIL PROVIDED TO DETERMINE SCOPE AND ACTUAL PROPOSED |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 12. SOME DETAILS SHOW MORE THAN ONE COLUMN, FLOOR PLAN |
| | SHOWS ONE. |
| | |
| | 13. PLEASE EXPLAIN USE OF OPEN CLASSIFICATION, |
| | FBC1609.1.5. |
| | |
| | 14. A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME AS |
| | CONFLICTING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
