| Date |
Text |
| 2009-07-31 18:06:45 | |
| | ** DENIED 3RD REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | *** NOTES SPECIFIC TO THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE |
| | STILL NOT ADDRESSED MEETING MINIMUM FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE REQUIREMENTS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT FS |
| | 553.80(2)(B) IS NOT ASSESSED ONLY DUE TO THE FACT THE |
| | SAME DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HAS NOT BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS EACH TIME THE PLANS HAVE BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. THE FACT IS THE NEW SUBMITTED ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE NOW SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY A NEW |
| | DESIGNER THAN SUBMITTED ON THE PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATUTE NOTED ABOVE AS IT STATES THE |
| | *SAME SPECIFIC CODE SECTION NOTED*. THE SAME CODE |
| | SECTION HAS BEEN REPEATED THREE TIMES. |
| | THE 4X FEE IS NOT ASSESSED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS SHALL BE PLACED INTO THE INPUT |
| | DATA REPORT OF THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. IT WAS SPECIFICALLY |
| | NOTED BY THIS REVIEW THAT ALL NEW PARKING LOT LIGHTING |
| | FIXTURES HAD BEEN ADDED YET NONE OF THESE WERE PLACED |
| | INTO THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE IDR WHICH DOES NOT INDICATE *ANY* OF THE |
| | PARKING LOT FIXTURES. THIS IS POSSIBLE WHEN PARKING LOT |
| | LIGHTING FIXTURES ARE COVERED BY THE SECTIONS NOTED |
| | ABOVE. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, AND |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE THE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 |
| | FBC AS THE PROJECT IS UNDER THE 2004 FBC. |
| | THE IDR ONLY INDICATES TWO OF THE THREE 52 WATT |
| | FIXTURES SHOWN ON PLANS. IF THIS WAS THE ONLY FIXTURE |
| | MISSING THIS WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED TO FAIL |
| | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE13-103.3 AS IT STATES THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | *BUILDING OFFICIALS OR THEIR OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED |
| | REPRESENTATIVES SHALL ASSURE THAT THE COMPLIANCE FORMS |
| | ARE COMPLETE AND WITHOUT GROSS ERRORS.* |
| | |
| | ** IT IS NOTED FOR INFORMATION ONLY TO SEE OTHER |
| | POSSIBLE ITEMS ON THE IDR WHICH ARE NOT THE SAME AS |
| | PRODUCTS ON PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE: IDR STATES *CARPET AND |
| | RUBBER PADDING* FOR ALL AREAS. SEE BUILDING REVIEW OR |
| | PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS FOR AREAS SUCH AS BATHROOMS |
| | WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE CARPET AND RUBBER PADDED. |
| | THIS IS NOTED ONLY AS A CREDIT IS BEING TAKEN. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
