| Date |
Text |
| 2009-04-16 19:28:24 | BUILDING CHANGE OF USE/ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW |
| | SECOND CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FBC WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: CAPITAL LETTERS REPRESENT ORIGINAL COMMENT. |
| | NON-CAPITAL LETTERS REPRESENTS RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 1- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY TO VERIFY IF IMPACT |
| | FEES FOR CHANGE OF USE ARE REQUIRED. BRING BACK PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | IF FEES ARE DUE. IF THIS WAS DONE BEFORE, PLEASE GET |
| | THE PLANS RE-STAMPED AND BRING COPY OF PAID RECEIPT. WE |
| | NEED THIS INFORMATION FOR RECORD KEEPING. |
| | |
| | ***OK TO BRING INFORMATION LATER ON PRIOR TO PRINTING |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2- ACCORDING TO PROPERTY APPRAISAL WEBSITE AERIAL VIEW |
| | OF THE BUILDING (SEE ATTACHED COPY) AND DEFINITION FOR |
| | BUILDING AREA ON CHAPTER SEC. 502 OF 2004 FBC THE |
| | BUILDING IS TO BE CONSIDERED AS ONE BUILDING. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR ENTIRE BUILDING TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH: |
| | A) TOTAL BUILDING AREA ALLOWED ACCORDING TO THE |
| | BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 503 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | *** MET WITH LUIS MARTINEZ & ROBERT BROWN. CALCULATIONS |
| | PROVIDED ARE OK TO CONSIDER THE WHOLE FLOOR FOR THE |
| | MOST RESTRICTIVE PROPOSED USE. THE ONLY THING REQUIRED |
| | AS EXPLAINED TO DON HORTON OVER THE TELEPHONE IS THE |
| | FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING SHOWING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE |
| | BUILDING, SPECIALLY THE OPEN ROOFED AREA BETWEEN THE |
| | TWO CONNECTED BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET 2.1: |
| | A) LANDING ON EAST RAMP BY SINGLE ENTRY DOOR DOESN'T |
| | COMPLY WITH SEC. 11-4.8.4 FBC 2004. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | *** RESPONSE WAS OK FOR THE BREEZEWAY AREA, BUT THE |
| | COMMENT WAS REFERING TO THE EAST RAMP BY SINGLE ENTRY |
| | DOOR (ENTRY TO THE TRIFT SHOP). RESPONSE TO THE |
| | RAILINGS ON THE RAMP WHERE NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE THE |
| | RISE IS ONLY 4" IS OK, BUT THE LANDING BY THE DOOR |
| | NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED SECTION. |
| | |
| | B) MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOOR LEADING TO THE WOMEN |
| | TOILET ROOM DOESN'T COMPLY WITH FIGURE 25 OF CHAPTER 11 |
| | FBC 2004. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | ***ONE WATER FOUNTAIN WAS PROVIDED. SHOW CLEARANCE |
| | DIMENSION ON FLOOR PLAN. REMEMBER ONLY WRITEN |
| | DIMENSIONS ARE TO FOLLOW, NOT SCALING PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) SHOW OVERALL BUILDING FOOTPRINT. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ITEM #2 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | *** OVERALL BUILDING FOOTPRINT WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR |
| | VERIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET 5.1: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE TRUSS ENGINEERING PACKAGE. TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS |
| | OFFICE. |
| | |
| | *** OK TO BE SUBMITTED LATER ON. |
| | |
| | B) COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES ZONES FOR ROOF |
| | SCHEDULE: CLARIFY WHY SPACING FOR NAILS AT INTERMEDIATE |
| | SUPPORTS IS NOT GIVEN FOR ROOF ZONE #3. |
| | |
| | *** INFORMATION WAS REVISED. FIRST USED RING SHANK |
| | NAILS AND THE SPACING WAS OK EXCEPT THAT ZONE 3 WAS |
| | MISSING INFORMATION. NOW, THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED |
| | NEED TO REVISE THE NAIL SPACING FOR ZONES 1, 2 AND 3. |
| | SEE TABLE 2304.9.1 OF 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET 6.1: |
| | A) COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES ZONES FOR WALLS |
| | SCHEDULE: CLARIFY WHY THE NAIL SPACING IS MORE CLOSER |
| | TOGETHER FOR ZONE 4 THAN FOR ZONE 5. |
| | |
| | *** TABLE WAS REVISED, BUT WIND EXPOSURE WAS CHANGED |
| | FROM C TO B ON SHEET 2.1. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | B) STRUCTURAL DOOR BUCK DETAIL: SEE SUBMITTED PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL AND REVISE DOOR BUCK DETAIL AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | *** SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND REVISE DETAIL AS REQUIRED. |
| | DETAIL PROVIDED DOESN'T MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME. THIS IS ALSO |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1714.5.4 OF 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | C) TOILET ELEVATIONS: CLARIFY DIMENSION OF 33" AND 7" |
| | SHOWN BY THE MIRROR AND SINK SIDE. WHERE ARE THIS |
| | DIMENSIONS TAKEN FROM?. THEY DON'T WORK WITH SINK RIM |
| | HEIGHT EITHER. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | *** DIMENSIONS WERE CHANGED BUT THEY DON'T COMPLY. SEE |
| | FIGURE 31 OF CHAPTER 11 OF 2004 FBC AND REVISE |
| | DIMENSIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET SEP-1: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING FOR LIGHT POLES TO |
| | WITHSTAND 140MPH "SUSTAINED" WIND SPEED AS REQUIRED BY |
| | EXTERIOR LIGHT POLES NOTES #2 AND #5. |
| | |
| | *** OK TO PROVIDE LATER ON PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LIGHT |
| | POLES THAT MEET THE DESIGN CRITERIA. THIS INFORMATION |
| | NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | *** OK TO PROVIDE LATER ON PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | C) SEPARATE PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR NEW PARKING |
| | WORK. COORDINATE WITH ZONING AND ENGINEERING. |
| | |
| | ***THIS IS JUST AN ADVICE. COORDINATE WITH THEM. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND DETAILS. |
| | NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | PAGE AND PAGE WHERE CONNECTORS ARE SHOWN. NO NEED TO |
| | SUBMIT COMPLETE REPORT. THIS APPLIES TO STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTORS ONLY. |
| | |
| | *** OK TO SUBMIT LATER ON. |
| | |
| | 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA 06-0626.04 SUBMITTED: |
| | SELECTED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 11 OF 24 IS FOR AN INSULATED |
| | DECK. ALSO, IT'S LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7. NEED |
| | TO PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | NAIL ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS. SEE |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON PAGE 24 OF 24. |
| | |
| | *** OK TO BE SUBMITTED LATER ON. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: COORDINATE INSULATION WITH R-VALUE REQUIRED BY |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 10- ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | COPIES SUBMITTED. SEE COMMENTS BY OTHER TRADES. |
| | |
| | 11- ASBESTOS REPORT SUBMITTED: |
| | A) REPORT NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL WHO PREPARED IT AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 |
| | AND 481 OF FLORIDA STATUTE. PLEASE, MAKE SURE NAME OF |
| | PROFESSIONAL AND LICENSE NUMBER IS PROVIDED AND |
| | ORIGINAL SEAL AN SIGNATURE IS PROVIDED AS WELL. REPORT |
| | SUBMITTED WAS NO SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | |
| | *** MISSING THE RAISED SEAL OF THE ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | 12- NEW COMMENT FOR NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED: ( |
| | THIS MAY BE PROVIDED LATER WITH ALL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | INFORMATION). |
| | A) PROVIDE APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ROLL DOWN |
| | SHUTTERS. INFORMATION SUBMITTED DOESN'T IDENTIFY THE |
| | AGENCY WHO APPROVED THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL. THERE IS NO |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL #. EG: FL1234. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALALTION SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED |
| | SAMPLE. AND, MARK ON SHUTTER DRAWINGS SPECIFIC MOUNTING |
| | CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED. THIS |
| | APPLIES TO BOTH ROLL SHUTTERS AND ACCORDION SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE ACCORDION SHUTTERS PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 2004 |
| | CODE VERSION, NOT 2007. THIS BUILDING WAS REVIEWED |
| | UNDER 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
