| Date |
Text |
| 2009-01-06 17:45:07 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1. SPECIFY DESIGN UPLIFT, DESIGN LATERAL PARALLEL TO |
| | PLATE, AND DESIGN LATERAL PERPENDICULAR TO PLATE. SEE |
| | SIMPSON CATALOG, GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO THE DESIGNER, |
| | ITEM E, REGARDING THE UNITY EQUATION. COMPLIANCE CANNOT |
| | BE DETERMINED AS DESIGN LOADS NOT SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | PLAN. FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, THIS PAGE HAS BEEN PRINTED |
| | AND ATTACHED. IT IS ALSO AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.STRONG |
| | TIE.COM/FTP/CATALOGS/C-2009/C-2009-P014-P015.PDF. |
| | |
| | 2. REGARDING THE TRUSS DRAWINGS, PLEASE NOTE THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A. SIGNATURE TO BE AN ORIGINAL AND TO INCLUDE A DATE, |
| | FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | B. AN INDEX SHEET WAS PROVIDED, BUT NOT SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED. |
| | |
| | C. SHEET 1 OF THE PLAN SPECIFIES 25PSF ATTIC LIVE LOAD; |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THIS ATTIC SPACE WILL BE USED FOR |
| | STORAGE. 10PSF NONCONCURRENT LIVE LOAD INCLUDED ON THE |
| | TRUSS, PLEASE REVISE TO BE 25PSF CONCURRENT AS PER |
| | ARCHITECT'S PLAN. IF PLAN IS REVISED, PLEASE SPECIFY |
| | THAT THE ATTIC WILL NOT BE USED FOR ANY STORAGE. |
| | |
| | D. SHEET 1 OF THE PLAN SPECIFIES 27PSF DL; PLEASE |
| | REVISE TRUSS ENGINEERING. |
| | |
| | E. TRUSS INDEX SHEET REFERS TO ANSI/TPI 1-95, INCORRECT |
| | VERSION, SEE FBC R43. |
| | |
| | F. HIB 91 SUMMARY SHEET INCLUDED; SEE FBC R 802.1.6.3, |
| | THIS STANDARD IS OUTDATED. PLEASE REFER ONLY TO CURRENT |
| | STANDARDS, FBC R43. |
| | |
| | G. THE SIMPSON AND USP SPEC SHEETS ARE OUTDATED (1997, |
| | VARIOUS YEARS). PLEASE SEE THE WEBSITE; A NEW 2009 |
| | CATALOG IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SPEC SHEETS |
| | SUBMITTED REFER TO OUTDATED STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | H. GIRDER CONNECTION INFORMATION, AND OTHER SHEETS |
| | PROVIDED WHICH DO NOT APPEAR TO BE PERTINENT TO THIS |
| | JOB. |
| | |
| | I. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 IS |
| | REQUIRED ON EACH SIGNED AND SEALED SHEET. THIS WAS |
| | INCLUDED ON THE INDEX SHEET, WHICH WAS NOT SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED, BUT NOT ON THE TWO TRUSS ENGINEERING SHEETS |
| | WHICH WERE SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | |
| | J. A PIGGYBACK TRUSS DETAIL AS WELL AS OTHER DETAILS |
| | WERE PROVIDED, PREPARED BY ROBBINS ENGINEERING, BUT ARE |
| | PHOTOCOPIES. ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND |
| | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, |
| | DATED ORIGINALS FS471 AND INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 AND BE SEALED WITH A SEAL |
| | ACCEPTABLE TO FBPE, FAC61G15-23.001. THE DETAILS DO NOT |
| | ADDRESS THE 10# BCLL REQUIREMENT, AND INCLUDE NOTES |
| | MADE AFTER THE DATE OF THE ENGINEERS' SEALS; TRUSS |
| | DESIGN LOAD NOT CONSISTENT WITH PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE HAVE THE DESIGNER OF RECORD (ARCHITECT OR |
| | ENGINEER) REVIEW THE TRUSS DRAWINGS, ENGINEERING, AND |
| | LAYOUT PLAN, FAC61G15-31.003. |
| | |
| | 4. SEE FAC61G15-31.003 REGARDING SUBMITTAL OF TRUSS |
| | DRAWINGS. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE INTENT IS TO SIGN AND |
| | SEAL EACH SHEET, OR TO USE AN INDEX SHEET. EITHER |
| | METHOD IS ACCEPTABLE; HOWEVER, MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE RULE. SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5. PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE FLAT ROOF, |
| | PITCHED ROOF FAC9B72. FOR THE FLAT DECK, CONTRACTOR |
| | MUST SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND SPECIFY ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING IF NECESSARY. THIS MAY BE DONE WITH THE ROOF |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION; THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED BEFORE |
| | A ROOF PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 6. SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED. INFORMATIONAL ONLY. |
| | |
| | 7. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | 8. THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF |
| | ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA, |
| | FBC1603.1.4. |
| | |
| | 9. THE PLAN PROPOSES TO LEAVE PORTIONS OF THE ROOF AND |
| | ROOF FRAMING IN PLACE. AS THIS STRUCTURE IS ON THE |
| | DEMOLITION LIST, PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER CERTIFY THE |
| | CONDITION OF THE EXISTING ROOF FRAMING, CONNECTIONS, |
| | AND ROOF ASSEMBLY. SEE ALSO FBC EB 507.2.2 AND ADDRESS |
| | ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 10. PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE FOR THIS JOB. THIS IS TO |
| | INCLUDE COST OF ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
