| Date |
Text |
| 2009-03-13 15:15:38 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW |
| | SECOND CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007 |
| | REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | NOTE: THIS MAY BE RECORDED AT TIME OF PERMIT PICK UP. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SUBMITTED WAS |
| | RECORDED ON 12/12/2008. IT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS WHEN |
| | WORK IS NOT STARTED. SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. NEED |
| | TO PROVIDE RE-RECORDED ONE. |
| | |
| | 2- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R301.1 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. NOTE: ATTIC LIVE LOADS NEED TO BE |
| | INCLUDED ALSO. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | STRUCTURAL LOADS SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED ON SHEET A3 |
| | ARE VERY CONFUSING AND STILL ARE NOT ADDRESSING THE |
| | REQUIRED ATTIC LIVE LOADS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF |
| | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | NOTE: ONE SET OF PLANS WAS RETAINED IN THIS OFFICE TO |
| | SEND TO BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NOA #03-0605.04 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON 09/11/2008 AND IS |
| | FOR 4", 6" AND 12" PRECAST LINTELS. NONE OF THESE SIZES |
| | ARE USED ON PLANS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 8" |
| | LINTELS. ALSO, ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE |
| | IN WRITING NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B) ENTRY DOOR AND KITCHEN AND BEDROOM EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| | CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR THE |
| | ENTRY AND ALL OTHER OPENINGS. |
| | ***NOTE: NOA 02-1211.10 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON JULY 17, |
| | 2008. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | (1) NOA 04-1022.04 SUBMITTED IS FOR "INSWING" DOORS. |
| | PLANS SHOW "OUTSWING" DOORS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (2) MISSING BEDROOM EXTERIOR DOOR. |
| | |
| | (3) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH TYPE OF |
| | DOOR SHOWN ON DOOR SCHEDULE AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (4) GLASS DON'T HAVE IMPACT PROTECTION. SHUTTERS ARE |
| | REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH STORM SHUTTERS INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | (5) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR 8'-0" HIGH DOORS. |
| | SEE PLANS FOR SIZE SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | (6) PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) HURRICANE SHUTTERS: PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE. COMPLETE ALL THE |
| | INFORMATION AND CLEARLY MARK ON SHUTTERS DRAWINGS |
| | SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILD |
| | OUT, ETC) AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE |
| | USED. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | THIS ITEM WAS NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INFORMATION AND CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING TWO DIFFERENT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR TWO DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER'S. |
| | ALSO, PLEASE MAKE SURE TO PROVIDE TWO COPIES FOR EITHER |
| | SELECTION. EG: ONLY ONE COPY OF NOA 06-0706.17 WAS |
| | PROVIDED. AND, PRODUCT APPROVAL NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WERE NOT |
| | APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | 5- SINCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN THE CEILING |
| | FAN CREDIT, THEN THE ELECTRICAL PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW SIZE |
| | OF CEILING FANS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 OF |
| | FBC 2004. AND, THEY NEED TO BE INSTALLED FOR |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE SIZE OF CEILING FAN SPECIFIED FOR LIVING ROOM. |
| | SEE SIZE OF ROOM ON SHEET A1 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R401.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SITE PLAN ON SHEET A1. |
| | ARROWS SHOW WATER TO BE DIVERTED TO THE ADJACENT |
| | NEIGHBORS. WATER CAN'T RUN INTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET A1: |
| | A) SPECIFY ATTIC SIZE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 |
| | OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | 22" X 22" SIZE SHOWN DOESN'T COMPLY. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED FOR DOOR AND WINDOWS |
| | DON'T CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE "C" AS SHOWN ON BUILDING |
| | INFORMATION CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON WINDOW/ DOOR SCHEDULES |
| | AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON SHEETS A2 AND A3 DON'T MATCH |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: COORDINATE INFORMATION SHOWN ON OPENING |
| | TABLES AND INFORMATION SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | C) ENTRY DOOR TO BE MIN. 3'-0" WIDE BY 6'-8" HEIGHT AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.4.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | FLOOR PLAN SHOWS ENTRY DOOR OPENING TO BE 3'-2" . THIS |
| | MASONRY OPENING WON'T ALLOW TO INSTALL 3'-0" WIDE DOOR. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: KEEP IN MIND REQUIRED BUCK |
| | SIZE. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | D) MASTER BATHROOM TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON FLOOR PLAN |
| | DOESN'T MATCH TYPE OF DOOR SHOWN ON DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | E) SIZE OF WINDOW SPECIFIED ON WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T |
| | MATCH SIZE OF WINDOW SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION |
| | CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS H32, WHILE |
| | BUILDING INFORMATION CHART SHOWS H33. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | F) NOTE INSIDE FOUNDATION PLAN CALLS FOR 48" MAX. |
| | SPACING FOR VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT BETWEEN FILLED |
| | CELLS. FOUNDATION PLAN AND FLOOR PLANS SHOW SOME AREAS |
| | WHERE THE THE MAX. VERTICAL SPACING OF FILLED CELLS |
| | EXCEED THE 48". REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | PLANS NOW DON'T SPECIFY THE SPACING OF VERTICAL |
| | REINFORCEMENT. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS OR PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS ON FOUNDATION PLAN. |
| | |
| | G) REVISE BUILDING WIDTH AND BUILDING LENGTH DIMENSIONS |
| | SHOWN ON BUILDING INFORMATION CHART. SEE FLOOR PLANS |
| | FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE BUILDING LENGTH. |
| | |
| | H) REVISE BUILDING SIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON |
| | SITE PLAN. 122'? |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET A2: |
| | A) WHERE IS BEAM B-2 SPECIFIED ON EXTERIOR CMU WALL |
| | SECTION A/A2?. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET A3: |
| | A) REVISE NUMBER/SIZE OF NAILS AND UPLIFT LOADS SHOWN |
| | ON TRUSS CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SEE |
| | CONNECTOR PRODUCT APPROVAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK SHOWN ON BUCK DETAIL |
| | FOR DOOR. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED SIZE. ALSO, |
| | DOOR FRAME NEEDS TO BE FULLY SUPPORTED ON BUCK AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R613.6 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. PROVIDE BUCK SIZE THAT PROVIDES FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | DOOR FRAME. |
| | |
| | 10- PLEASE, RETURN REVIEWED SET OF DRAWINGS AFTER |
| | CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO ORIGINAL DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE |
| | THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 11- FOR INFORMATION ONLY: ENGINEER TO SEE ATTACHED COPY |
| | OF FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING FEES FOR |
| | MULTIPLE PLAN REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
