| Date |
Text |
| 2009-07-24 20:12:21 | |
| | ** DENIED REVISIONS ** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED SKE ELECTRICAL DETAIL |
| | SHEETS DO NOT CONTAIN THE RAISED SEAL AS REQUIRED PER |
| | FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025. IN FACT ONE OF THE THREE |
| | SUBMITTED IS A PHOTO-COPY. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT A MINIMUM OF TWO ORIGINAL SIGNED, DATED |
| | AND SEALED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: IT WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS AS A |
| | *HEADS-UP* ON INFORMATION TO SEE THE NEW FLORIDA |
| | ASME-17 FOR MINIMUM ELEVATOR CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | THIS OFFICE DOES NOT REVIEW FOR THESE ITEMS FOR MINIMUM |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE HOWEVER BASED ON THE CODE REQUIREMENTS |
| | KNOWN TO THIS REVIEWER LIGHTING IN AREAS OF THE |
| | ELEVATOR LOBBY AS SHOWN WOULD NOT MEET MINIMUM. AN |
| | INSPECTION BY THE STATE ELEVATOR INSPECTOR WOULD NOT BE |
| | THE TIME TO FIND OUT ITEMS WHICH WOULD THEN NEED TO BE |
| | ADDED WHICH WOULD DELAY A TCO OR CO. |
| | ** SEE LIGHTING LEVELS FOR SILLS AND AT LANDINGS. |
| | |
| | ** THIS WILL AFFECT LPC. 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2, |
| | 13-415.2. |
| | |
| | ** THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN OF |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THE ELEVATOR LOBBY. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
