| Date |
Text |
| 2009-03-03 17:06:43 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION/RENOVATION |
| | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007 |
| | REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | ***NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE RECORDED LATER AT TIME OF |
| | PERMIT PICK UP. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET 1.1: |
| | A) CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK. PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIBES |
| | REMODELING THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ACCORDING TO |
| | PLANS. PERMIT APPLICATION DOESN'T INCLUDE THE ADDITION |
| | OF THE NEW BALCONY. ALSO, IS NOT CLEAR IF AREA OF WORK |
| | IS THE REAR ACCESSORY BUILDING ONLY. OR IF EXISTING |
| | MAIN HOUSE IS GOING TO HAVE SOME WORK ALSO. THERE IS |
| | ONLY ONE NOTE ON MAIN HOUSE SAYING THAT EXISTING |
| | RESIDENCE TO BE REMODELED, BUT THE DRAWINGS DON'T SHOW |
| | ANY WORK FOR THE MAIN HOUSE. FENCES AND PRIVACY WALL |
| | ARE TO BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS. CLARIFY NOTES |
| | REGARDING GRADING SLOPE. IS REGRADING PART OF THE SCOPE |
| | OF WORK IN THIS PERMIT? |
| | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) STILL NO CLEAR. PLANS SAY "NEW COVERED ENTRY AT |
| | EXISTING ENTRY" AND "NEW ADDITION" ON REAR OF HOUSE BUT |
| | THERE IS NOT INFORMATION PROVIDED ON PLANS. PROVIDE |
| | ONLY THE INFORMATION FOR SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED |
| | AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON SEPARATE PERMITS WHEN |
| | SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET 2.1: CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK FOR GUEST HOUSE |
| | NOTE: EXPAND BUILDING +/- 1'-6" TO ACCOMMODATE STAIRS |
| | TO MEET CURRENT CODE. THERE IS NOT INFORMATION PROVIDED |
| | TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS NOTE. AND, PLANS DON'T |
| | SHOW ANY BUILDING EXPANSION. ON THE OTHER HAND CHECK |
| | ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSION. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET 3.1: |
| | A) SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS FOR WINDOWS ON BATHROOMS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R308.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. |
| | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) PLANS SUBMITTED SPECIFY ""ALL BATH WINDOWS TO BE |
| | GLAZED FOR PRIVACY". PRIVACY AND SAFETY GLASS ARE TWO |
| | DIFFERENT THINGS. SEE SEC. R308.4 AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK FOR GUEST HOUSE REGARDING THE |
| | EXPANSION OF BUILDING +/- 1'-6" TO ACCOMMODATE STAIRS. |
| | THERE IS NOT INFORMATION ON PLANS REGARDING THIS ISSUE. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | C) CLARIFY FLOOR FRAMING NOTE. THERE IS NOT SECTION #1 |
| | ON SHEET 6.1. ALSO, CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK TO BE |
| | PERFORMED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | D) NEW BALCONY FRAMING PLAN: |
| | *SPECIFY ALL BEAMS. CLARIFY WHY SHOWING ONLY ONE MEMBER |
| | TO RECEIVE ALL FLOOR JOISTS?. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | **CLARIFY IF USING 2X6 FLOOR JOISTS OR 2X8 FLOOR |
| | JOISTS. BOTH ARE MENTIONED ON PLAN. SEE COMMENTS ON |
| | REVIEWED SET OF PLANS. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE SIZE OF JOIST HANGER ACCORDINGLY. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | ***CLARIFY ATTACHMENT OF WOOD POST TO BEAM. PROVIDE |
| | DETAIL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED LOADS OF SEC. |
| | R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. WHY IS THERE A |
| | LEDGER SHOWN INSTEAD OF A BEAM TO POST CONNECTION?. |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY CONNECTIONS AT CORNER POSTS AND |
| | INTERMEDIATE POSTS. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | ****SPECIFY HOW MANY SCREWS ARE REQUIRED TO ATTACH 2X6 |
| | WOOD DECK. TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH UPLIFT LOADS OF |
| | SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | *****CLARIFY WHY DIMENSIONS SHOW 6" WHEN SHOWING THE |
| | WOOD POST IF THE POSTS ARE SPECIFIED AS 4X4 POSTS? SEE |
| | COMMENTS ON PLANS. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | |
| | E) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | GUARDRAIL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE R301.5, AND |
| | SECTION R312 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) DETAIL SUBMITTED ON SHEET 5.1 DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY |
| | FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS. ALSO, THERE IS A NOTE SAYING |
| | THAT "WOOD HANDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL TO BE DESIGNED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE TO 2004 FBC". DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO |
| | PROVIDE THE DESIGN INFORMATION, NOT JUST CITE THE CODE |
| | IN GENERAL. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET 4.1: |
| | A) INFORMATION SHOWN ON EXISTING ROOF PLAN DOESN'T |
| | MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. CLARIFY |
| | SCOPE OF WORK. COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE NOTES AT BOTTOM OF CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. SEE |
| | COMMENTS ON PLANS. SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR MINIMUM NAIL SIZE/TYPE AND SPACING |
| | INCLUDING ON ROOF ZONE #3. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | C) COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES ZONES TABLES FOR |
| | ROOF AND WALLS IS MISSING THE NAILING SPACING AT |
| | INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS. IT ONLY CALLS FOR NAILING AT |
| | EDGES. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS. |
| | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) NEED TO REVISE SPACING AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS. |
| | SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D) CLARIFY WHY THE NAILING SPACING SHOWN ON WALLS |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING TABLE IS CLOSER TOGETHER FOR |
| | WALL ZONE 4 THAN FOR WALL ZONE 5. |
| | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) NO DONE. WHY ZONE 4 IS STRONGER THAN ZONE 5? |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET 5.1: |
| | A) TYPICAL TWO STORY WALL SECTION: |
| | *CLEARLY SPECIFY WHAT'S NEW AND WHAT'S EXISTING. |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE. |
| | ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) STILL NO CLEAR WHAT'S NEW AND WHAT'S EXISTING. |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED IS VERY CONFUSING. EG: IS THERE A |
| | NEW T&G SOFFIT?. HOW IS THE INSTALLATION OF NEW H10 |
| | SIMPSON CONNECTORS DONE?. IS THERE A NEW GYPSUM BOARD |
| | CEILING ON INSIDE?. IS THER A NEW WALL SHEATHING |
| | OUTSIDE?. INFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | **SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS FROM ROOF TO FOOTING TO SHOW |
| | CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R601.2 OF 2004 |
| | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | NOTE: CLARIFY WHY ONLY SECOND FLOOR JOISTS ARE RESTING |
| | ON ONLY ONE TOP PLATE IF THIS IS A BEARING WALL?. |
| | ***RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) ARE CONNECTORS NEW OR THEY ARE EXISTING?. |
| | |
| | ***SOFFIT AREA SPECIFIES 3"X16" VENTS AT 72"O.C.. |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT THESE VENTS ARE |
| | ADEQUATE TO COMPLY WITH SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | B) DOOR AND WINDOWS JAMB DETAILS DON'T MATCH WITH |
| | TYPICAL WINDOW OPENING SECTION AND TYPICAL WALL FRAMING |
| | SECTION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEE COMMENTS ON |
| | PLANS AND RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | *** C) NEW COMMENTS TO NEW TYPICAL STAIR DETAIL |
| | SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) CLARIFY IF RE-DOING EXISTING STAIRS. RISER TO TREAD |
| | RATION SHOWN ON THIS DETAIL DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. |
| | R311.5.3.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. ALSO, WHY |
| | SHOWING A GUARDRAIL ON STAIRWAY. GUARDRAIL NOT |
| | REQUIRED. ONLY HANDRAIL IS REQUIRED. SPECIFICATIONS |
| | CALL FOR 2 LAYERS OF TYPE X GYPSUM BD. ONLY ONE LAYER |
| | WAS SHOWN. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7- BRING REVISED PLANS FOR HISTORIC REVIEW STAMP (5TH |
| | FLOOR) PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | ***NEED TO BRING ANY PLANS THAT ARE REVISED AFTER |
| | TODAY'S COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8- OWES $1.70 FOR NEW BALCONY RADON FEES AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 10D-91 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE., SUBPART B. |
| | ***OK. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) ALL NEW EXTERIOR DOORS. CLEARLY IDENTIFY ENTRY DOORS |
| | AND BALCONY DOORS. |
| | *** INFORMATION NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | *** THIS APPLIES TO PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED AT |
| | THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 11- NEW COMMENT: |
| | (A) CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING SEPARATE WIND LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | (B) SEPARATE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH THOSE |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET 4.1. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
