| Date |
Text |
| 2008-11-20 13:46:26 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT |
| | TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY |
| | SHOWING ALL EXISTING SETBACK DIMENSIONS AND THE LEGAL |
| | DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY. SURVEY SHALL BE LESS THAN |
| | A YEAR OLD. |
| | |
| | 3. THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHOWS "PROPOSED |
| | COVERED BALCONY" THAT WILL REPLACE THE EXISTING ROOF |
| | DECK. THIS IS NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK |
| | FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT |
| | SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE THE PROPOSED SECOND STORY |
| | COVERED BALCONY. |
| | |
| | 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-77(A)(2)(D) OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), THE REQUIRED SIDE |
| | SETBACKS IN THE MULTIFAMILY HIGH DENSITY (MF32) |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT IS 15 FEET. THE PROPOSED |
| | COVERED DECK SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM |
| | THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 5. THE HEIGHT ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ARE MEASURED FROM THE |
| | FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. PROVIDE OVERALL BUILDING |
| | HEIGHT DIMENSIONS FROM GRADE ON ALL ELEVATIONS. IN |
| | ADDITION, PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-611 OF THE |
| | ZLDRS, BUILDING HEIGHT MEANS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM |
| | THE MEAN GRADE OF A LOT AT THE FRONTAGE OF THE BUILDING |
| | TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE OF A |
| | FLAT ROOF, OR TO THE DECK LINE OF A MANSARD ROOF, OR TO |
| | THE MID-HEIGHT LEVEL BETWEEN EAVES AND RIDGE FOR GABLE, |
| | HIP, AND GAMBREL ROOFS. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | PER SECTION 94-305(B)(2) OF THE ZLDRS, STRUCTURAL |
| | OVERHANGS, INCLUDING ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTIONS SHALL |
| | NOT EXTEND FARTHER THAN THREE FEET INTO ANY SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 7. THERE APPEARS TO BE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE |
| | EXISTING SITE PLAN AND THE EXISTING FLOOR PLANS. THE |
| | EXISTING SITE PLAN ONLY SHOWS THE KITCHEN EXTENSION OF |
| | THE HOUSE; HOWEVER, THE FLOOR PLANS SHOW A COVERED DECK |
| | WITH COLUMNS, AND A SECOND STORY ROOF DECK, ON THE EAST |
| | SIDE OF THE KITCHEN. IF THIS IS THE CASE, THE EXISTING |
| | DECK SHALL ALSO BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING SITE PLAN WITH |
| | ALL SETBACK DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 8. THE "EXISTING ROOF BELOW" SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN AND ON THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN, DO |
| | NOT MATCH THE EXISTING ROOF SHOWN ON THE EXISTING |
| | SECOND FLOOR PLAN. IN ADDITION, THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN |
| | DOES NOT SHOW THE ROOF PROJECTIONS OF THE KITCHEN, AND |
| | THE PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION STATES "NEW ASPHALT |
| | SHINGLE ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING." PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 9. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE |
| | ZLDRS, WORK VALUE EXCEEDING 50 PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF |
| | THE STRUCTURE SHALL REQUIRE PROPERTIES TO BE BROUGHT |
| | INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV, LANDSCAPING, LAND |
| | CLEAR AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE ZLDRS. IF THE WORK |
| | VALUE EVER EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE (EXCEEDS $72,964.5), A LANDSCAPE PLAN OF THE |
| | SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC |
| | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
| | |
