| Date |
Text |
| 2009-03-26 13:07:19 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: AS NOTED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW ON THE FIRST |
| | COMMENT. IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT PLANS WERE ONLY |
| | SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY. THIS DOES NOT *LOCK* A |
| | PROJECT UNDER ANY SPECIFIC CODE EDITIONS UNLESS PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION IS MADE. AS THE PROJECT WAS ONLY SUBMITTED |
| | FOR PLAN REVIEW AND IS DESIGNED UNDER THE 2004 FBC THIS |
| | DID NOT LOCK PROJECT UNDER THE 2004 FBC. AS OF MARCH 1, |
| | 2009 THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER FS 553.73 HAS ADOPTED |
| | THE 2007 FBC WITH 2009 REVISIONS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO KNOW SOME OTHER CODES SUCH AS THE LIFE |
| | SAFETY CODE AND STATE FIRE CODE WERE ALSO REVISED PER |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 69A-60.003 AND .004 BY THE |
| | STATE FIRE MARSHAL. |
| | THE FOLLOWING CODES NEED TO BE ON PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE |
| | THE FOLLOWING ARE ON ELECTRICAL AS WELL. SOME CODES |
| | STATED ON PLANS ARE OK AND IN EFFECT. PLEASE BE SURE |
| | THE FOLLOWING ARE UPDATED ON ALL RELEVANT SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS. |
| | 2006 NFPA-101 |
| | 2006 NFPA-1 |
| | OTHER CODES SUCH AS 2002 NFPA-72, 2005 NFPA-70 ARE |
| | STILL ACCURATE. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO FBC |
| | AND CHAPTER 13 FOR LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. |
| | THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS FROM COMCHECK ARE NOT ADOPTED |
| | BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE OR PERMITTED IN THE STATE |
| | OF FLORIDA. THE PREVIOUS CODE SECTIONS GIVEN WERE |
| | STATED BASED ON THE CODE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE |
| | PLAN REVIEW SUBMISSION. SINCE THAT TIME AS STATED IN |
| | NOTE #1, THE STATE HAS ADOPTED A NEW CODE. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13 2007 EDITION WITH 2009 GLITCH |
| | AMENDMENTS. THIS CHAPTER WAS COMPLETELY REVISED FROM |
| | THE FIRST PRINTING OF THE 2007 FBC. THERE ARE |
| | SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WHICH WILL AFFECT THIS PROJECT. |
| | ** PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER |
| | 13-415.2, 13-415.AB.5, 13-415.AB.5.1, 13-415.B |
| | THESE SECTIONS FOR LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS |
| | HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY REVISED. |
| | |
| | ** ONCE AGAIN THE SUBMITTED COMCHECK CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | NOT PERMITTED AND CAN NOT BE USED IN THE STATE OF |
| | FLORIDA. ONE COPY HAS BEEN RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | ** IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT THE INPUT DATA |
| | REPORT WHICH WILL ACCOMPANY THE SUBMITTED ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS MUST COORDINATE WITH ALL COMPONENTS OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON PLANS. THIS INCLUDES ALL |
| | LIGHTING FROM PLANS, FIXTURE LEGEND ETC. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: AS STATED IN PREVIOUS REVIEW PLEASE SUBMIT AND |
| | SHOW LIGHTING CONTROLS MEETING MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE 210 AND 220 HOWEVER THE |
| | ONLY ITEM ON THOSE SHEETS ARE NOTES TO PROVIDE A SYSTEM |
| | OF SOME SORT. PLACING A NOTE ON PLANS IN LIEU OF ACTUAL |
| | DETAILS OR DESIGN OF A CODE COMPLIANT SYSTEM IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. MUST SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE KNOW THE |
| | CODE SECTIONS UNDER THE 2007 FBC HAVE NOW BEEN REVISED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS. 13-415.AB.1.1, .1.2 |
| | AND .1.3 |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: THIS IS A NEW NOTE: BY DEFINITIONS IN THE FBC, |
| | ARE THESE TWO SEPARATE BUILDINGS? IS THE WALL WITH NEW |
| | OPENINGS A FIRE WALL? PLEASE SEE DEFINITIONS OF FIRE |
| | WALL. |
| | IF THESE ARE TWO SEPARATE BUILDINGS, ON TWO SEPARATE |
| | SERVICES AND NOW BECOMING ONE BUILDING THEN SOME |
| | CLARIFICATION AND CHANGES IN DOCUMENTS MAY BE NEEDED. |
| | THERE CAN BE OPENINGS IN FIRE WALLS HOWEVER THERE ARE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHERS TRADES INCLUDING ELECTRICAL. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMPLETE RISER DIAGRAM FOR ALL |
| | SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THESE BUILDINGS. THE WALMART WHICH |
| | IS LOCATED IN THIS SAME SHOPPING CENTER IS A SEPARATE |
| | BUILDING WITH FIRE WALL SEPARATION AND IS NOT PART OF |
| | THESE TWO BUILDINGS. THE WALMART SECTION IS NOT PART OF |
| | THIS QUESTION. |
| | BASED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS THESE APPEAR TO BE |
| | POSSIBLY BE TWO BUILDINGS WHICH EXIST BEING MADE INTO |
| | ONE. |
| | BASED ON RISER THERE SEEMS TO BE TWO SEPARATE |
| | ELECTRICAL SERVICES WHICH WOULD NOW BE FED FROM ONE |
| | GENERATOR. |
| | BONDING OF SERVICES, ETC ARE NOT KNOWN. |
| | THERE IS A 400 AMP BREAKER FEEDING NEW ATS TO PANEL D |
| | HOWEVER THE CONDUCTORS AS SHOWN ARE ONLY RATED FOR |
| | 200AMPS. 310.16, 240.4 RISER DOES NOT INDICATE PARALLEL |
| | FEEDERS. |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE GO OVER DESIGNS FOR MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | ** ONCE AGAIN THERE ARE SOME ITEMS NOT SUBMITTED OR |
| | KNOW AT THIS TIME AND THERE MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE |
| | FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. |
| | ONE SET OF PLANS FOR ELECTRICAL WILL ALSO BE RETAINED |
| | BY THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT ** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED |
| | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
