Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 08090611
Permit Number 08090611
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2008-12-25 11:26:08** DENIED 2ND REVIEW **
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE
 STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING.
 THERE ARE ALSO SOME NEW COMMENTS AS THERE ARE SEVERAL
 ASPECTS OF DESIGN CHANGING ALONG WITH NEW ITEMS WHICH
 WERE NOT PART OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW.
  
  
 1) NOTE: THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SUBMITTED CONTAIN A
 SIGNATURE AND DATE HOWEVER NONE OF THE SHEETS CONTAIN
 THE RAISED SEAL AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTES
 481.221.
 THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND ALL REVIEWERS
 WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER TRADES.
  
 2) NOTE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE MISSING
 INFORMATION REQUIRED ON THE TITLE BLOCKS. PLEASE SEE
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G1-16.004 AND FLORIDA
 STATUTES 481.219.
 MISSING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER.
 MISSING PRINTED NAME OF SAID DESIGNER.
 MISSING PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER OF ARCHITECT.
  
 ** THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE ANY
 OTHER TRADE OR THE LANDSCAPE REVIEWER.
  
 3) NOTE: IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS HELD IT WAS DISCUSSED
 WHETHER OR NOT THE BUILDING WAS GOING TO BE ADJUSTED TO
 SEPARATE INTO MORE THAN ONE BUILDING BY DEFINITION. BY
 THE RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT THE INTENT AS SHOWN AND
 NOTED IS THIS IS A SEPARATE BUILDING. HOWEVER BY
 DEFINITION IN CHAPTER 2 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 WHICH WILL DIRECT YOU TO 702.1 FOR FIRE RESISTIVE
 CONSTRUCTION DEFINITIONS. THIS IS ALSO IN THE
 DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 13 SECTION 202 OF THE SAME CODE.
 THIS WOULD REQUIRE A ** RATED FIRE WALL*. PLEASE SEE
 THE DEFINITION OF A FIRE WALL. THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS
 EXTRACTED DIRECTLY FROM THE CODE.
  
 ****
 FIRE WALL. FIRE-RESISTANT WALL, HAVING PROTECTIVE
 OPENINGS, WHICH RESTRICTS THE SPREAD OF FIRE AND
 EXTENDS CONTINUOUSLY FROM THE FOUNDATION TO OR THROUGH
 THE ROOF, WITH SUFFICIENT STRUCTURAL STABILITY UNDER
 FIRE CONDITIONS TO ALLOW COLLAPSE OF CONSTRUCTION ON
 EITHER SIDE WITHOUT COLLAPSE OF THE WALL.****
  
 PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE THE SECOND PART OF THE SENTENCE
 WHICH THE CONSTRUCTION WILL ALLOW THE COLLAPSE OF THE
 CONSTRUCTION ON EITHER SIDE WITHOUT THE COLLAPSE OF THE
 WALL.
 A 2HR RATED DEMISING WALL DOES NOT MEET THIS
 REQUIREMENT. THIS WILL AFFECT OTHER ASPECTS OF THE
 STRUCTURE AND BUILDING. SEE OTHER COMMENTS BELOW.
 THIS COMMENT IS ENTIRELY BASED ON THE DECLARED SQ FT ON
 PLANS AND CALCULATIONS WHICH DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE
 ACTUAL BUILDING.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE SHEET SP-1 WHICH ALSO DECLARES THREE
 SEPARATE BUILDINGS WHICH BASED ON STRUCTURAL AND
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS IS NOT THE CASE.
 WHAT IS THE INTENT OF DESIGN? ELECTRICAL PLANS HAVE
 BEEN REVISED HOWEVER NOW SHOWING THREE SEPARATE
 SERVICES BEING PROPOSED, ONE FOR EACH TENANT SPACE. SEE
 ELECTRICAL COMMENTS BELOW AS THREE SERVICES ARE NOT
 PERMITTED TO THIS ONE BUILDING AS SHOWN.
 COORDINATION OF UNITS NEEDS TO BE DONE ON PLANS.
 WHERE A SHEETS INDICATE WAREHOUSE *B*, THE ELECTRICAL
 SHEETS INDICATE WAREHOUSE *A*> ETC
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NEW SUBMITTED METHOD *C* FLA
 COM FORM DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE
 SQ FT FOR BUILDING AREA ON PLANS IS SUBSTANTIALLY
 GREATER THAN THAT ON THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FOLLOWING TEXT FOR BUILDING WITH
 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY USE IN AREAS. ONLY WHEN THE
 ADDITIONAL AREAS ARE LESS THAN 5% MAY THE MAJORITY AREA
 USE BE PERMITTED.
 METHOD *C* IS FOR BUILDING AREA, YET THERE ARE SEVERAL
 AREAS WHICH THE OCCUPANCY IS GREATER THAN 5% OF THE
 MAIN USE.
 PLEASE ADJUST. THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS TAKEN DIRECTLY
 FROM THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 ****
 13-101.1.4 BUILDINGS WITH MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY TYPES.
 WHEN A BUILDING CONTAINS MORE THAN ONE OCCUPANCY TYPE,
 EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL CONFORM TO THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OCCUPANCY HOUSED THEREIN.
 EXCEPTIONS:
 1. WHERE MINOR OCCUPANCY USE DOES NOT OCCUPY MORE THAN
 5 PERCENT OF THE FLOOR AREA OF THE BUILDING, THE MAJOR
 USE SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY. ****
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL INFORMATION ON PLANS WITH
 RESPECT TO BUILDING COMPONENTS AND LIGHTING CORRELATE
 WITH THE PLANS. ONE EXAMPLE GIVEN IS THE EXTERIOR
 LIGHTING WHICH DOES NOT CORRELATE.
 ** ONE EXAMPLE IS THE INFORMATION ON THE LIGHTING
 FIXTURE LEGEND IS NOT CLEAR. WATTAGES, TYPES ETC SHOWN.
 NO DETERMINATION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND COORDINATION
 OF THE IDR CAN BE DONE.
 ** ANOTHER EXAMPLE:
 THE SUBMITTED PLANS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING NOTE 100W
 FIXTURES, THE IDR INDICATES 250WATT FIXTURES AND THE
 FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT INDICATE ANY SPECIFIC TYPE OF
 EXTERIOR FIXTURES DETERMINATION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE CAN
 NOT BE ACHIEVED.
 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO
 REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS PER FBC 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,
 .1.2 AND .1.3.
 PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE LIGHTING CONTROL
 PANEL. THE SYMBOL LEGEND STATES THE OVER RIDE SHALL BE
 HIGH BAY OCCUPANCY SENSORS WITH AN OVER RIDE TIME OF
 4HRS.
 THIS IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE WHEN EVERY KNOWN
 OCCUPANCY SENSOR DEVICE TO THIS OFFICE FROM MOST
 MANUFACTURES IS MAXIMUM 30MINS AFTER THE LAST SENSING
 OF THE OCCUPANT. PLEASE SEE SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 OF
 THE FBC WHICH DOES NOT PERMIT AN OVER RIDE OF MORE THAN
 30MINS WITH THE USE OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS AS OVERRIDES.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE PLANS WHICH INDICATE A *S* WHICH BY THE
 SYMBOL LEGEND IS A SINGLE POLE SINGLE THROW SWITCH.
 THIS TYPE OF DEVICE WILL NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE FBC SECTIONS GIVEN NOR WILL IT
 PROVIDE AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF DURING AN OVER RIDE.
 THERE MAY BE SOME SORT OF MISPRINT WITH THE WORDING ON
 SYMBOL LEGEND.
 PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ROOMS AND AREAS WHICH ARE MISSING
 LIGHTS AND CONTROLS PER SECTIONS GIVEN. ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS INDICATE LIGHTS NEXT TO AHU ROOM YET NO
 INFORMATION ON ELECTRICAL PLANS IN FACT THIS ROOM IS
 BLANK.
 IN MEETING HELD BEFORE PLANS WERE SUBMITTED IT WAS
 REQUESTED TO SUPPLY THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS
 ON THE PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL(S) AND ALL
 EQUIPMENT. THE SHEETS SUBMITTED DO NOT PROVIDE
 INFORMATION ON REQUIRED LIGHTING CONTROLS PER SECTIONS
 OF THE CODE GIVEN ABOVE. IN FACT THE SHEETS EXPAND ON
 THE DIMMING POSSIBILITIES WHICH IS OK HOWEVER DOES NOT
 PROVIDE INFORMATION ON CONTROLS OF LIGHTS TO MEET
 MINIMUM SHUT OFF REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY.
 ALSO AS GONE OVER IN MEETING PLEASE BE SURE DOCUMENTS
 CONTAIN A LISTING FROM ONE OF THE ADOPTED NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORIES. ( NRTL) PER 110.3.
 IE: UL, ETL< MET< TUV< TUV AMERICA< CSA ETC.
  
 7) NOTE: THE PLANS NOW SHOW NEW ELECTRICAL GATE AND
 LIGHT POLE OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY LING BASED ON SURVEY
 AND SITE PLANS. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. THE MAY BE FED
 FROM A SEPARATE OFF THE PROPERTY HOWEVER IT MAY NOT
 CROSS THE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED GATE IS ALSO NOT PART
 OF THE SHOWN PROPERTY AND IS NOT INCLUDED.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS INFORMATION WILL BE ROUTED TO FIRE
 MARSHAL, ZONING AND BUILDING REVIEWERS.
 230, FBC SEE NOTES FROM OTHER TRADES.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEC 230.2. THE RISER NOW SHOWS A
 PROPOSED THREE SEPARATE SERVICES WHICH CAN NOT BE
 GRANTED BASE ON 230.2. THE SERVICE SIZE, VOLTAGE,
 OCCUPANCY ETC DOES NOT MEET ALLOWANCE FOR OTHER TWO
 ADDITIONAL SERVICES. THIS IS ONE BUILDING BY ALL
 DEFINITIONS LISTED ABOVE IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE 2005 NEC HANDBOOK DIAGRAM. BY
 ILLUSTRATIONS THIS IS ONE BUILDING AND BY RISER THESE
 ARE THREE SEPARATE SERVICES.
 PLEASE REVISE RISER.
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES AND IN MEETING HELD
 BEFORE PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED IT WAS DISCUSSED THAT ANY
 CONTROLS FOR EGRESS LIGHTING SHALL BE FAIL SAFE ON PER
 NFPA-101 7.8.1.2.2, FBC 1006.1.2
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY ALSO BE NEW COMMENTS
 WITH RESPECT TO AREA ABOVE OFFICES. THIS AREA IS SHOWN
 TO CONTAIN A NEW 42 INCH HIGH WALL HOWEVER CLEAR STAIRS
 ARE SHOWN TO AREA YET NO OTHER INFORMATION IS SHOWN. IN
 FACT THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DO NOT SHOW OR NOTE ANY
 STAIRS THEY IN FACT INDICATE THIS SAME ROOM AS *STORAGE
 AREA*. THE ELECTRICAL PLANS CLEARLY NOTE THIS SAME ROOM
 AS STAIR WITH LIGHTING TO ABOVE. HOWEVER THEY DO NOT
 SHOW THE ACTUAL STAIRS.
 ELECTRICAL PLANS ALSO INDICATE FUTURE ELEVATOR YET
 INFORMATION ON OTHER PLANS AND SHEETS DO NOT SHOW ANY
 OF THESE ITEMS.
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR EGRESS AREAS.
 PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2 WITH RESPECT TO MORE
 THAN ONE FLOOR. SEE FBC FOR FLOOR DEFINITIONS.
 AS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW TO PROVIDE
 EGRESS LIGHTING FOR STAIRS THE RESPONSE FROM DESIGNER
 WAS THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. THE PHOTO-METRICS
 SUBMITTED TO NOT SHOW LEVELS FOR EITHER STAIRS.
 PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.1, .2.2.
 SEE SHEET E-2B WHICH INDICATES TO LIGHTS ABOVE FOR
 CONTROLS ETC HOWEVER THERE IS NO 2ND FLOOR LIGHTING OR
 POWER PLANS FOR THIS END OF THE BUILDING.
 SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES AND BE AWARE OF NOTED
 REQUIREMENTS FOR EGRESS, LIGHTING CONTROLS ETC.
 PLEASE SEE FBC13-415.1.ABC.1, FOR AREAS CONSIDERED
 SEPARATE FLOORS.
  
 ** ONE SET OF THE PLANS WILL BE RETAINED.
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE
 SYSTEMS AS SHOWN. RISER INDICATES ALL GOING TO FOOTER
 STEEL. THIS IS AN EXISTING BUILDING AND IF THERE IS NOT
 CURRENTLY A BOND TO FOOTER STEEL NEW ONES WILL NOT BE
 REQUIRED INTO EXISTING FOOTING STEEL. THIS IS ONLY
 NOTED AS ALL NEW FOOTER STEEL IS REQUIRED TO BE BONDED.
 ** NOTED FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF DEVICES FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM.
 RESPONSE MENTIONS CANDELA LEVELS AND HEIGHTS ARE ON ICE
 RINK PLANS HOWEVER BASED ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED ONLY
 THE CD LEVELS AND HEIGHTS IN RINK ARE SHOWN. PLEASE SEE
 SECTIONS 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3. ALL LOCATIONS FOR ADA
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET; ALL PULL STATION HEIGHTS,
 STROBE HEIGHTS, ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE MORE THAN THE ICE RINK AREAS
 WHICH REQUIRE DEVICES.
 SEE COMMENTS FROM FIRE REVIEW FOR MINIMUM NFPA-72
 REQUIREMENTS AS FULL PROTECTION OF ANY FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM MAY NOT ONLY BE RINK AREA.
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.70 FOR MISSING LIGHTING
 REQUIRED IN AHU ROOM.
 PLEASE SEE 210.63, 210.8 FOR SERVICE RECEPTACLE.
  
 14) NOTE: THE AIC RATINGS AND FAULT CURRENTS ARE SHOWN
 HOWEVER THE RATINGS AT MAINS NEED TO BE SHOWN.
 110.9
 THE ANALYSIS SUBMITTED IS FOR MAINS AT EACH UNIT. IF 42
 K IS THE RATING FOR SBA, THE RATING FOR THE MAIN WILL
 BE SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER AND NO INFORMATION FOR ANY OF
 THE MAINS IS SHOWN.
  
 15) NOTE: PLANS INDICATE HWB WHICH IS NOTED FOR HOUSE
 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING ETC YET THIS PANEL IS IN ONE
 OF THE TENANT SPACES.
 THE WAREHOUSE SPACE *B* IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED HOW CAN
 IT POSSIBLE THE PANELS ARE BLANK WITH NO CIRCUITING?
 HOUSE POWER/SITE LIGHTING MAY NOT BE FED FROM PANEL IN
 TENANT SPACE.
  
 16) NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST DESIGNATIONS OF FUTURE BACK UP
 POWER PANELS. THESE ARE NOT *EMERGENCY* BACK UP
 SYSTEMS. PLEASE SEE DEFINITIONS IN NEC 700, 701 AND
 702.
 THESE PANELS ARE OPTIONAL STAND-BY.
  
 17) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE THE LOADS FOR THE WATER
 HEATERS ON THE LOAD CALCULATIONS WITH THAT OF THE LOADS
 ON THE PANELS. THE LOADS ON PANELS FAR EXCEED THAT OF
 THE LOAD ON CALCULATIONS. ONE WATER HEATER ALONE
 EXCEEDS LOAD SHOWN FOR ALL THREE.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE 422.13 FOR THE 2005 NEC AS THE LOAD IS
 A CONTINUOUS LOAD AND SHALL BE FIGURED AT 125%.
  
 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 3006.2 FOR FUTURE ELEVATOR
 LIFT.
  
 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.22,23 AND 24 FOR FUTURE
 ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM. THIS IS NOTED AS COMMENTS FROM
 OTHER REVIEWS AND USE OF SECOND FLOOR AREA HAS NOT BEEN
 DETERMINED AT THIS TIME AS VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY MAY
 BE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.
  
 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW AS IT WAS
 REQUESTED TO SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS
 FOR THE PROPOSED ATS. THIS WAS GONE OVER IN MEETING
 ALSO. THE PLANS NOW SHOW THIS PROPOSED ATS ON SHEET E-6
 HOWEVER THE INFORMATION IS NOT CLEAR AND VERY FAINT AND
 BLURRY.
 PLEASE SUBMIT SEPARATE SHEETS OR IMPROVE ON PRINTED
 SHEET.
 110.3, 90.7
 FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION,
 CLARITY ETC.
  
 21) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT/SHOW SCHEDULE FOR SBA AS OTHER
 PANELS ARE SHOWN GIVING THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR
 EQUIPMENT.
 408.4, 110.9, 90.7 ETC
 FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION,
 CLARITY AND COORDINATION.
  
 22) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS FOR
 FEEDERS/BRANCH CIRCUITS PER 13-413.1ABC.1.
 VOLTAGE DROP.
 13-413.1.ABC.1.1 FEEDERS.
 FEEDER CONDUCTORS SHALL BE SIZED FOR A MAXIMUM VOLTAGE
 DROP OF 2 PERCENT AT DESIGN LOAD.
 13-413.1.ABC.1.2 BRANCH CIRCUITS.
 BRANCH CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS SHALL BE SIZED FOR A MAXIMUM
 VOLTAGE DROP OF 3 PERCENT AT DESIGN LOAD.
  
 ** SUBMITTED FOR WAREHOUSE A AND B, HOWEVER NEED SITE
 BRANCH CIRCUIT(S)
  
 23) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE FOLLOWING IS LISTED ON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS. THIS IS TAKEN FROM THE FBC SECTIONS.
 **13-413.1.ABC.2.1 DRAWINGS.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL REQUIRE THAT WITHIN 30
 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE, RECORD
 DRAWINGS OF THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION SHALL BE PROVIDED
 TO THE BUILDING OWNER, INCLUDING:
 1. A SINGLE-LINE DIAGRAM OF THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL
 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND
 2. FLOOR PLANS INDICATING LOCATION AND AREA SERVED FOR
 ALL DISTRIBUTION.
 13-413.1.ABC.2.2 MANUALS.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL REQUIRE THAT AN OPERATING
 MANUAL AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL BE PROVIDED TO THE
 BUILDING OWNER. THE MANUALS SHALL INCLUDE, AT A
 MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING:
 1. SUBMITTAL DATA STATING EQUIPMENT RATING AND SELECTED
 OPTIONS FOR EACH PIECE OF EQUIPMENT REQUIRING
 MAINTENANCE.
 2. OPERATION MANUALS AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR EACH
 PIECE OF EQUIPMENT REQUIRING MAINTENANCE. REQUIRED
 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ACTIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED.
 3. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF AT LEAST ONE QUALIFIED
 SERVICE AGENCY.
  
 24) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE PANEL SCHEDULES ARE COMPLETE
 WITH LOADS AND SPECIFIC APPLIANCES. FOR EXAMPLE: R1B8
 WHICH BY THE PANEL SCHEDULE ONLY LIST VIEWING ROOM
 RECEPTACLES LOOKS TO BE A HALF SWITCH RECEPTACLE UNDER
 THE SINK WHICH WOULD LEND TO A DISPOSAL. DISPOAL WOULD
 BE REQUIRED TO BE ON A SEPARATE CIRCUIT WITH LOADS
 FIGURED.
 PLEASE ALSO VERIFY LOAD SHOWN FOR WASHER AS THIS IS
 NOTED A 1KVA.
 THE PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW A REFRIGERATOR FOR CIRCUIT
 R1B20 YET THE PANEL SCHEDULE DOES NOT INDICATE ANY
 CIRCUIT. IN FACT THE SCHEDULE IS BLANK FOR THIS
 LOCATION.
  
 PLEASE COORDINATE ALL, THESE ARE A FEW EXAMPLES AND ARE
 NOT ALL.
 PLEASE SEE 408.4,240.4,310.16, AND 220.
  
  
 25) NOTE: ** IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT AS THERE IS A
 SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF INFORMATION NOT YET CLEAR FOR
 USE, OCCUPANCY, FLOORS, LIGHTING ETC THERE MAY VERY
 WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH CAN
 NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME.
 PLEASE ALSO BE AWARE OF FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO
 REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY NOTED
 AT THIS TIME AS THERE WERE SOME CODE SECTIONS REPEATED
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH WAS NOT ADDRESSED.
 ** ONE COMPLETE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS
 OFFICE ALONG WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
  
  
  
 **IMPORTANT**
 ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP
 FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE
 ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING.
 DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY
 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS,
 SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED
 INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID
 ANY DELAYS.
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT
 TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT THIS REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved