| Date |
Text |
| 2008-12-30 09:00:16 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED |
| | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD. PLEASE CALL |
| | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. THE PLANS MUST BE |
| | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT IS TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | NOT COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ITEM |
| | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 2-5. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6. A01 SPECIFIES WP1200 WALL; PROVIDE A DETAIL FBC 7, |
| | FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, DETAIL W6 WAS ADDED TO A.10.1 BUT IS NOT |
| | COMPLETE WITH ALL DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. FOR |
| | INSTANCE, DETAIL STATES THAT METAL STUD IS TO BE ?AS |
| | REQUIRED?. UL U497 HAS A MINIMUM GAUGE FOR METAL STUD. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE ALL SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | THIS WALL, AND CHECK ALL OTHER UL ASSEMBLY DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 7. CV01 STATES THAT OFFICES, STORAGE, AND MERCANTILE |
| | AREAS ARE ACCESSORY. DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR |
| | EACH FBC 5. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, ACCESSORY AREAS ARE NOT TO EXCEED 10%, |
| | FBC302.2. THE STORAGE AREA SHOULD BE DECLARED S1, AND |
| | THE BUILDING AS A MIXED OCCUPANCY, SEE FBC302.1, |
| | FBC302.2. AS THE STORAGE AREAS EXCEED 20%, THEY CANNOT |
| | BE DECLARED AS ACCESSORY USE. PLEASE SEE ALSO |
| | FBC302.3.1. |
| | |
| | 8. THIS ITEM WAS ADDRESSED, BUT PLEASE SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS REGARDING ISSUES WITH THE BUILDING CODE |
| | SUMMARY. |
| | |
| | 9. NOTE ALL REQUIRED FIRE RATED WALLS ON THE PLAN. |
| | OPENING AND PENETRATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, ETC. |
| | ARE NOT READILY APPARENT WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION FBC7. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE INCLUDE FIRE RATING REQUIREMENT FOR |
| | WALL TYPE W11. PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL COMMENTS REGARDING |
| | MISSING FIRE DAMPERS (M SHEETS). |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE ARCHITECT IS SPECIFYING A 2 HOUR |
| | OCCUPANCY SEPARATION (HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL) AS WELL |
| | AS A 1 HOUR CORRIDOR. SEE SHEET A13, FBC712.4.1.2, |
| | SPECIFY LOCATIONS OF PENETRATIONS WITH A T RATING OF 0 |
| | OR 1, OR OTHERWISE NOTE LIMITATION OF USE OF THESE |
| | DETAILS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE FBC706.1 AND FBC708.1, OCCUPANCY |
| | SEPARATIONS ARE TO BE FIRE BARRIERS, NOT FIRE |
| | PARTITIONS AS NOTED ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 10. DECLARE OCCUPANT LOAD FBC 1004. |
| | |
| | THIS ITEM WAS ADDRESSED, BUT SEE SHEETS E4 AND A01. THE |
| | BREAK ROOM (A01) IS SHOWN AS A VIEWING ROOM (E4). IT IS |
| | UNCLEAR AS TO HOW THIS AREA HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED ON |
| | CV01. ALTHOUGH THE AREA IS SMALL, THIS MAY AFFECT |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD; IT APPEARS THAT 100SF PER OCCUPANT HAS |
| | BEEN USED, BUT POSSIBLY OCCUPANT LOAD AS HIGH AS 7SF |
| | PER OCCUPANT MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 11. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12. SP01 SHOWS THREE DIFFERENT BUILDINGS. PLEASE SEE |
| | FBC TABLE 503, FBC TABLE 601, FBC TABLE 602. DO FIRE |
| | WALLS EXIST SEPARATING THESE BUILDINGS OR ARE THEY ONE |
| | BUILDING FOR PURPOSES OF FBC CHAPTERS 5 AND 6? AN |
| | OPENING IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE NORTH AND CENTER |
| | BUILDINGS; SEE FBC TABLE 704.8, NO OPENINGS PERMITTED |
| | WITH A SEPARATION OF 0 TO 3 FEET. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE SEE ROCAMAR ENGINEERING RESPONSES TO |
| | ELECTRIC COMMENTS. HE STATES THAT THESE ARE THREE |
| | SEPARATE BUILDINGS, YET THE ARCHITECT ON THE PLAN AND |
| | IN THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THEY ARE ONE |
| | BUILDING. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH OTHER DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS. THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN DONE ON THE |
| | ASSUMPTION THAT THE ARCHITECT IS CORRECT, AND THE THREE |
| | BUILDING AREAS ARE TO BE TREATED AS ONE BUILDING. IF |
| | THE THREE BUILDING AREAS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED THREE |
| | SEPARATE BUILDINGS, THEY MUST BE SEPARATED WITH FIRE |
| | WALLS FBC705. |
| | |
| | 13. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 14. CV01, DECLARE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR THE |
| | BUILDING OR BUILDINGS (SEE OTHER COMMENTS), FBC5, FBC6, |
| | FBC EB8. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE EXPLAIN BUILDING AREA DECLARED ON |
| | CV01. THE ICE RINK AREA APPEARS TO BE APPROXIMATELY |
| | 42,250, TOTAL SF AREA DECLARED ON CV1 IS 43,310. THIS |
| | APPEARS TO BE LESS THAN HALF THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | SEE DEFINITION OF AREA, BUILDING, FBC502. IT APPEARS |
| | THAT ONLY THE ICE RINK AREA WAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, YET |
| | BY DEFINITION THIS IS NOT THE ENTIRE BUILDING. |
| | INFORMATION REGARDING THE ENTIRE BUILDING, ALL THREE |
| | SPACES, MUST BE SHOWN AS WELL AS COMPLIANCE WITH FBC |
| | CHAPTER 5, BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLAN SHOWS A 2 HR DEMISING WALL, |
| | NOT A 3 HOUR FIRE WALL SEPARATING BUILDINGS, SEE |
| | DEFINITION FBC705, FBC TABLE 705. UNLIMITED AREA |
| | BUILDING REQUIREMENT IS OPEN SPACE AROUND THE |
| | PERIMETER, BUT IF THIS IS DESIGNED AS A ?SEPARATE |
| | BUILDING?, ONE SIDE LACKS THE OPEN SPACE (THE SIDE |
| | AGAINST THE OTHER BUILDING). IF THE ENTIRE BUILDING |
| | AREA IS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, INFORMATION REGARDING THE |
| | OTHER PORTION(S) OF THE BUILDING MUST BE SHOWN TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5, FBC 6. |
| | |
| | CV.01 STATES THAT TWO STORIES ARE ALLOWED PER FBC503. |
| | ONLY ONE STORY PERMITTED FOR UNLIMITED AREA BUILDINGS |
| | FBC507.2; IF YOU CHOOSE TO DESIGN USING FBC TABLE 503 |
| | PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE TABLE ALONG WITH |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE INCREASES (SPRINKLER, OPEN |
| | SPACE). |
| | |
| | INFORMATIONAL ONLY; PLEASE NOTE THAT S2 OCCUPANCY IS |
| | FOR NON COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE AS DEFINED IN FBC311.3. IF |
| | THIS OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS DECLARED FOR THE OTHER |
| | SPACES, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION WILL BE REQUIRED. S1 |
| | IS THE MORE TYPICAL CLASSIFICATION FBC311.2. |
| | |
| | 15. CV01, PROVIDE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREAS FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED MEZZANINES AS WELL AS OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| | FOR THE USE OF THESE SPACES, FBC 3, FBC10, FBC11. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE SEE ELECTRIC COMMENTS, MEP AND |
| | STRUCTURAL SHEETS. STAIRS ARE STILL SHOWN ON THE PLAN |
| | TO A MEZZANINE AREA, YET THE ARCHITECT STATES THAT |
| | THERE IS NO MEZZANINE AT THIS TIME AND HAS REMOVED THE |
| | MEZZANINE FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY |
| | SHEETS. PLEASE COORDINATE. ALL PLANS SHOULD REFLECT THE |
| | SAME FLOOR PLAN. |
| | |
| | S2 STILL REFERS TO THE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM AS A |
| | MEZZANINE. SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT LIST REGARDING CODE |
| | ISSUES FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN A MEZZANINE. PLEASE |
| | COORDINATE ALL TRADES; A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE |
| | DUE TO CONFLICTING INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | ALSO PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING THIS AREA. |
| | |
| | 16. THE MEZZANINE AREAS MUST MEET THE DEFINITION |
| | FBC502. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, SEE COMMENT 15. PLANS SUBMITTED ARE NOT |
| | CONSISTENT AND CODE COMPLIANCE FBC502 HAS NOT BEEN |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 17-19. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 20. SEE FBC*109.3.6.4.4, FS553.79(7)(D) AND INCLUDE THE |
| | STATEMENT ATTESTING TO COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT?S PLAN SHOWS CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FOR BUILDING AREA, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, |
| | ACCESSIBLE PARKING, ETC. THIS SHEET SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE |
| | THE STATEMENT REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE, OR HAVE |
| | OTHER DESIGN PROFESSIONALS TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR |
| | THESE ITEMS. |
| | |
| | 22. PLANS ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED FS481. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE A DATE ON THE SEAL. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLANS ARE NOW SIGNED AND DATED BUT ONE SET |
| | IS NOT SEALED, FS481. |
| | |
| | 23-24. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 25. FP SHEETS DO NOT HAVE A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN FOR THE |
| | MEZZANINE AREAS. |
| | |
| | THIS WAS PROVIDED FOR THE MECHANICAL PLATFORM, BUT NOT |
| | FOR THE STRUCTURAL DECK (FUTURE MEZZANINE). PLEASE |
| | REVISE OR SHOW WHERE IN NFPA13 THIS AREA IS EXEMPTED. |
| | THE SAME SPACE IS BEING CREATED, BUT WITHOUT ACCESS |
| | STAIRS, IT SEEMS THAT THE FIRE RISK REMAINS. |
| | |
| | 26. A01 SPECIFY FIRE RATING (TIME) REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | WP1200 WALL, SOUTH SIDE. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS WAS ADDED. |
| | SEE A01, UNABLE TO FIND INFORMATION REGARDING FIRE |
| | RATING FOR THE EXISTING DEMISING WALL. |
| | |
| | 27. FBC13-101.3, BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC13-4. |
| | |
| | ENERGY CALCS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A. THE ENERGY CALCS DO NOT APPEAR TO INCLUDE THE SHELL |
| | FOR UNIT B. PLEASE REVISE. SQUARE FOOT AREA AND |
| | COMPONENTS ARE TO CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS. SEE |
| | FBC13-101.1.6. |
| | |
| | 28. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 29. ADDRESSED; PLEASE NOTE THAT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE |
| | FIRE RATED GLAZING WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION (PROVISO ITEM). |
| | |
| | 30-32. PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING THE |
| | MEZZANINE. IF MEZZANINES ARE INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT, |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 33. A03, AS CANOPY INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED, A |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED (INFORMATIONAL ONLY). |
| | |
| | 34. PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE UPPER LEVEL |
| | AREAS. SEE FBC505.5, INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS ARE |
| | NOT TO BE A PART OF ANY MEZZANINE. ALSO DECLARE |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR THESE AREAS, FBC CHAPTER |
| | 3. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, SEE FBC 502DEFINITIONS, INDUSTRIAL |
| | EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS ARE LIMITED TO USE IN INDUSTRIAL |
| | OCCUPANCIES. PLEASE RECLASSIFY THIS AREA OR REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED IN FBC CHAPTER 5. NOTE THAT THE ENTIRE SPACE |
| | WAS CLASSIFIED AS A4, SEE SHEET CV.01. SEE ALSO OTHER |
| | COMMENTS REGARDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | MEP AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS SHOW STAIRS TO THE WEST |
| | MEZZANINE AREA, ARCHITECTURALS HAVE REMOVED ACCESS. |
| | EQUIPMENT PLATFORM SHOWN AS MEZZANINE ON STRUCTURAL |
| | DRAWINGS. PLEASE COORDINATE. |
| | |
| | 35. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 36. SOILS REPORT, ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC61G15-23.002(2) REQUIRED (CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION). PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REQUIREMENT HAS |
| | RECENTLY BEEN REVISED. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 37. SEE ENERGY CALCS; NO DOORS SHOWN, ICE RINK FLOOR IS |
| | SHOWN AS CARPET. PLEASE REVISE THESE ITEMS AND CHECK |
| | ALL INFORMATION ON THE ENERGY CALC INPUT DATA REPORT. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN THE ROOF R VALUE; R19 BATT INSULATION IS SHOWN |
| | (MULTIPLIED BY BTU) THAT IT HAS AN R VALUE OF 30. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW R30.3 WILL BE ACHIEVED. |
| | |
| | SEE SHEET A06, WALL SECTION DOES NOT SPECIFY BATT |
| | INSULATION. IT SPECIFIES NEW INSULATED EXTERIOR WALL |
| | AND ROOF PANELS, BUT R VALUE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED OR |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. FBC*106, FBC13. |
| | |
| | 38. PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT SIGN THE ENERGY CALC, |
| | FBC103.1.1.1. IF A TYPED NAME IS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A |
| | SIGNATURE, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION |
| | (INCLUDE THE EXISTING COMPONENTS, SUCH AS EXISTING |
| | INSULATION) IS INCLUDED. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES HE WILL COMPLY. PLEASE REVISE ENERGY CALCS PER |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS AND, WHEN RESUBMITTING, CONFIRM THAT |
| | ARCHITECT HAS SIGNED THE APPROPRIATE LINE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 39. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE |
| | EXISTING ASPHALT ENTRY ROAD. IS THIS ENTIRELY ASPHALT |
| | OR IS THERE AN EXISTING SIDEWALK? SEE FBC11-1.2, |
| | FBC11-4.1.2(1), FBC11-4.1.6(1)(K), SHEET SP1. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT A SIDEWALK IS TO BE REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | BERMS. ALSO IT APPEARS THAT THE SLIDING GATE (TO BE |
| | RELOCATED) BLOCKS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC |
| | WAY TO THE BUILDING. PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN TO CLARIFY |
| | SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | |
| | 40. REGARDING THE PROPOSED BERMS, PLEASE SEE |
| | FBC*109.3.10, IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE SHOW HOW |
| | THE DRAINAGE FOR THE ADJACENT PARCEL WILL BE AFFECTED |
| | BY THE PROPOSED BERM CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 41. THE PLANS STATE THAT THE EXTERIOR IS ON A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT, VARIOUS SHEETS INCLUDING SHEET CV01 WHICH |
| | REFERS TO 08090571. AT THIS TIME, ONLY DEMO FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR HAS BEEN ISSUED. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE EXTERIOR |
| | RENOVATION PLANS UNDER PERMIT 08090571, OR PROVIDE ALL |
| | INFORMATION FOR THE BUILDING EXTERIOR WITH THIS |
| | RESUBMITTAL, OR AS A REVISION TO THE DEMO PERMIT. THIS |
| | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT; |
| | INFORMATION AND COMPLIANCE FOR 140MPH MUST BE |
| | DEMONSTRATED FBC1609. |
| | |
| | 42. THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ICE RINK |
| | AREA IN THE TRAVEL DISTANCE. THIS MUST BE INCLUDED, |
| | FROM WORST CASE (DISTANCE FARTHEST FROM RINK EGRESS). |
| | |
| | SEE SHEET LS01. IT STATES LIFE SAFETY IS PER TABLE 1004 |
| | AND 704. TABLE 1004 IS TO DETERMINE OCCUPANT LOAD, 704 |
| | SPECIFIES FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALL. |
| | SHEET CV01 CORRECTLY STATES THAT EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCE LIMITATION IS 200FEET. IT ALSO STATES THAT |
| | MAXIMUM IS 168FEET. SHEET LS01 STATES THAT REQUIRED |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE IS 325FEET, 179 FEET PROVIDED. SEE FBC |
| | TABLE 1015.1. 200 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED (NOT |
| | REQUIRED). WHY WOULD CV01 STATE 168 FEET, WHICH IS LESS |
| | THAN 179 FEET? IT APPEARS THAT THE TRAVEL DISTANCE OF |
| | 179 FEET DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ICE ARENA, PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | THE SAME TABLE STATES THAT ? HR FIRE RATING IS REQUIRED |
| | FOR CORRIDORS, BUT 1 HOUR IS REQUIRED. IT STATES THAT |
| | 25FT DEAD END CORRIDOR IS REQUIRED, BUT ONLY 20FEET IS |
| | PERMITTED FBC1016. PLEASE CHECK ALL INFORMATION ON THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 43. FBC717.2.3, A02, FIREBLOCKING REQUIRED, SOFFIT |
| | DETAIL (INTERIOR WALLS). |
| | |
| | 44. FBC11-4.13.11, DOORS IN THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT (PULLING FORCE). THIS |
| | WOULD NORMALLY BE A REDLINE ITEM; HOWEVER, AS PLANS |
| | NEED TO BE REVISED, PLEASE ADDRESS AT THIS TIME. IMPACT |
| | DOORS ARE SPECIFIED; DO THEY MEET THIS REQUIREMENT? |
| | |
| | 45. LOUVER PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE INCOMPLETE. PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC*106. PLANS DO NOT SPECIFY |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES, SEE A05. |
| | |
| | 46. PLEASE SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS, FIRST REVIEW. THE |
| | EXECUTIVE OFFICE PRIVATE BATH IS TO BE ADAPTABLE, |
| | FBC11-4.1.3(11). THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES |
| | THAT THIS WILL BE "EASILY CONVERTIBLE". THIS REQUIRES |
| | THAT NO STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS BE NECESSARY TO BE MADE |
| | FROM ADAPTABLE TO ACCESSIBLE, INCLUDING TURNING RADIUS, |
| | FIXTURE DISTANCES AND CLEARANCES, AND BACKING IN THE |
| | WALL FOR FUTURE GRAB BAR INSTALLATION. PLEASE SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 47. E4 AND LS01, SEE FBC11-4.28.1, VISUAL SIGNAL |
| | APPLIANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN RESTROOMS AND ANY |
| | GENERAL USAGE AREA. THIS IS NOT SHOWN IN THE MEN AND |
| | WOMEN RESTROOM ADJACENT TO THE LOCKER ROOMS #1 AND #2, |
| | ALARMS NOT SHOWN IN UNIT B. PLEASE CHECK ALL AREAS FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 48. PLEASE CLARIFY, DOES THE GATE AT THE RINK SWING IN |
| | BOTH DIRECTIONS? PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE |
| | ?DASHER BOARD?. SEE FBC1003.6, PATH OF EGRESS IS NOT TO |
| | BE INTERRUPTED BY ELEMENT OTHER THAN A MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | COMPONENT. OCCUPANT LOAD IS GREATER THAN 50, SO DOORS |
| | SHOULD SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL FBC1008.1.2, |
| | FBC1008. |
| | |
| | 49. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). A 4X PLAN |
| | REVIEW FEE IS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE TO BE CHARGED |
| | IF ANY CODE COMMENT IS MADE A THIRD TIME. |
| | |
| | |
