| Date |
Text |
| 2009-08-09 11:35:38 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** DENIED REVIEW OF REVISIONS** |
| | |
| | ** AT PREVIOUS MEETING HELD WITH ARCHITECT, OWNER |
| | REPRESENTATIVE, CONTRACTOR, PERMIT EXPEDITOR AND OTHER |
| | CITY STAFF IT WAS NOTED THAT NO MEP DESIGN TEAM MEMBERS |
| | WERE PRESENT. AT THIS TIME IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED |
| | THAT A MEETING BE HELD BEFORE PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED |
| | ONCE AGAIN. |
| | SOME OF THE NOTES BELOW WILL HAVE AN AFFECT ON PHASE I |
| | TCO. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED A VALUE UPDATE |
| | FOR THE PROJECT AS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK HAS |
| | SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED. THE NEW VALUE STATED ON |
| | RESPONSE IS ACTUALLY LOWER THAN THE ORIGINAL APPLIED |
| | VALUE. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK |
| | VALUE IS REQUIRED TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | EQUIPMENT, DESIGN COSTS. THIS INCLUDES ALL EQUIPMENT |
| | WHICH MAY BE OWNER PURCHASED OR SUPPLIED. |
| | FBC 108.3 |
| | COMPLETE CONTRACTS WITH ALL RELEVANT PARTIES INCLUDING |
| | DETAILED LISTS OF ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS CAN BE |
| | REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 13-415.AB.2.2, .5 AS THE SUBMITTED |
| | LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT COORDINATING |
| | WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT. THE SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTED FOR SITE LIGHTING DOES NOT HAVE *ANY* |
| | LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS MEETING MINIMUMS. THE |
| | NEW SUBMITTED REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS DO NOT SHOW |
| | ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTS. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THE SITE |
| | AS WELL AS THE BUILDING CONTAINS NUMEROUS LIGHT |
| | FIXTURES AND NONE ARE SHOWN IN THE CALCULATIONS. IN |
| | FACT THE INPUT DATA REPORT IS ACTUALLY BLANK. THIS IS |
| | NOT POSSIBLE. |
| | |
| | A) THE INTERIOR LIGHTING DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE |
| | SUBMITTED PLANS. THERE ARE MANY MORE FIXTURES ON PLANS |
| | THAN IN THE IDR. |
| | 13-415.B.1 |
| | |
| | B) FOR INFORMATION, THE WATTAGE USE ON PLANS IS |
| | SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER ON E-1 FOR EXAMPLE. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL |
| | LIGHTING FOR EGRESS AREAS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY |
| | CONDITIONS AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY. |
| | |
| | A) SPECIFICALLY SHEET EP-1, THE STAIRS CHANGED AND |
| | REVISED PHOTO-METRICS MEETING MINIMUM FOR LIFE SAFETY |
| | AND NORMAL OR EMERGENCY WAS SUBMITTED IN THE REVISIONS |
| | FOR PHASE 1. THE REVIEW WAS NOT COMPLETED BY THIS |
| | REVIEWER HOWEVER AS OF THE REVIEW PREVIOUSLY DONE UNDER |
| | PHASE II THIS WAS NOTED AS NEEDING TO BE REVISED. |
| | NFPA- 101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.1.2, .2.2. |
| | |
| | B) NO LEVELS SUBMITTED OR SHOWN FOR LEVELS FOR NORMAL |
| | EXTERIOR STAIRS (EAST). ONE EXAMPLE WOULD BE THESES |
| | STAIRS. THE SECTIONS OF THE CODES NOTED ABOVE FOR |
| | MINIMUM LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED 10FT CANDLES, |
| | PLEASE SUBMITTED ONLY SHOW LEVELS UNDER EMERGENCY. THE |
| | LEVELS ARE REQUIRED AT EACH STAIR TREAD, NOT ONE, TWO, |
| | OR THREE POINTS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE INDICATE WHAT HAPPENED TO LEVELS OF LIGHTS |
| | DURING PERFORMANCES? PREVIOUS NOTES GAVE INFORMATION AS |
| | TO THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THE LIFE SAFETY CODE. |
| | MANY OF THESE LIGHTING LEVELS ARE SHOWN UNDER NORMAL |
| | CONDITIONS HOWEVER LIGHTING IS ON *DIMMING PANELS* |
| | |
| | D) PLACE INFORMATION ON PLANS ON ACTIVATION OF |
| | EMERGENCY CONDITIONS/FIRE ALARM ACTIVATION AS PLANS ARE |
| | BEING CORRECTED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | E) ANOTHER EXAMPLE: UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, ONLY |
| | FIXTURES WHICH CONTAIN THE EMERGENCY BATTERY BACK UP |
| | MAY BE USED FOR LEVELS. PLEASE SEE FUTURE FRONT |
| | ENTRANCE FOR EXAMPLE. HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE |
| | LIGHTING IN AREAS TO CONTAIN A HIGHER LEVEL OF LIGHT |
| | WHEN PER THE LIGHTING PLANS THOSE AREAS DO NO CONTAIN |
| | FIXTURES WHICH ARE BATTERY BACK UP. |
| | |
| | F) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE KE FIXTURE LOCATED OUTSIDE. THIS |
| | IS A FIXTURE NOTED INSIDE HOWEVER THIS IS LOCATED |
| | OUTSIDE ON FIRST FLOOR IN AREA WHICH WOULD BE A WET |
| | LOCATION. MANUFACTURE SPECS ON SITE DOES NOT INDICATE |
| | THIS AS A WET LOCATION FIXTURE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.2.2 , FBC 1006.1.2, FOR |
| | OCCUPANCY SENSORS ON EGRESS LIGHTING AND ALSO LIGHTING |
| | CONTROLS ON NORMAL LIGHTING FOR EGRESS AREAS. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES WERE GIVEN WITH RESPECT |
| | TOP ASME-17 2004 FOR MINIMUM ELEVATOR CODES. HOWEVER |
| | THERE ARE AREAS IN WHICH MINIMUM LEVELS FOR THE |
| | REFERENCED CODE WOULD NOT BE MET. |
| | ** THIS IS ONLY NOTED. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: THE GENERATOR ON THE SUBMITTED RISER IS STILL |
| | SHOWING GROUND FAULT PROTECTION ON THE GENERATOR |
| | BREAKER. THE BACK UP SYSTEM WHICH IS AN OPTIONAL |
| | STAND-BY SYSTEM WILL NOT WORK BASED ON THE SYSTEM |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE 3-POLE ATS. |
| | ** THIS WAS REVISED ON THE GENERATOR SUB PERMIT HOWEVER |
| | NOT ON THIS RISER. PLEASE CORRECT AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: AS NOTED AND GONE OVER IN MEETING HELD BEFORE |
| | PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED. THE EGRESS PATH ON THE FIRST |
| | FLOOR WEST AREAS STILL INDICATES THE CONDENSING UNITS |
| | AND OTHER A/C EQUIPMENT NOT PERMITTED IN EGRESS PATH |
| | ALONE SIDE WALK. |
| | THIS WAS NOTED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL YET STILL SHOWN IN |
| | PATH. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: NO INFORMATION SHOWN FOR LOAD BANK ON |
| | GENERATOR. THE FRESH AIR MAKE UP IS LOCATED IN REAR OF |
| | BUILDING. THIS IS A 500KW DIESEL GENERATOR WITH NO LOAD |
| | BANK INFORMATION. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURE |
| | RECOMMENDED LOAD TO PREVENT WET STACKING. THIS |
| | INFORMATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO MECHANICAL AND FIRE |
| | MARSHAL. ** THIS IS NOTED ONLY BY THIS REVIEWER. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT INSTALLATION OF GENERATOR SHALL BE PER |
| | MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS PER LISTING. |
| | 110.3, 90.7 |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE RISER. THE LOAD CALCULATION |
| | FOR TWB STATES MINIMUM SERVICE REQUIRED 200AMPS YET THE |
| | RISER INDICATES 150AMP. |
| | THIS COULD HAVE REDLINED HOWEVER COMMENTS FOR OTHER |
| | ITEMS ON REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: REVISIONS TO FUNCTION OF LIGHTING CONTROL |
| | SYSTEM UNDER PHASE 1 NOT SUBMITTED. SYSTEM FUNCTION |
| | BEFORE TCO OF PHASE I SYSTEM LIGHTING WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2, .1.3 AND .1.4. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLANS ARE NO LONGER RELEASED PER BUILDING DIRECTOR. |
| | A TIME WILL NEED TO BE SET UP TO BRING IN NEW REVISIONS |
| | AND CHANGE OUT SHEETS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
