| Date |
Text |
| 2009-01-16 14:56:05 | ** DENIED PLANS** |
| | |
| | **THIRD REVIEW** |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: THE TITLE BLOCKS ARE STILL MISSING THE |
| | REQUIRED LICENSING PER FS 471.023 AND FAC 61G15-23.002. |
| | THE CERTIFICATE # AS SHOWN FOR KING STRUCTURAL GROUP IS |
| | IN FACT THE PE LICENSE NUMBER. A CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS REQUIRED BY STATE STATUTES. |
| | THIS HAS BEEN NOTED THREE TIMES WITH NO CORRECTION FOR |
| | LICENSING. PLANS MAY BE RETAINED FOR REVIEW FROM THE |
| | FLORIDA BOARD OF ENGINEERS LEGAL COUNSEL. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL PREVIOUS NOTES. LIGHTING |
| | CONTROLS DO NOT COMPLY TO 13-415.1.ABC.1, .1.1, .1.2. |
| | A MANUAL SWITCH IS NOT THE ONLY REQUIREMENT. |
| | MUST CONTAIN AN AUTOMATIC MEANS OF SHUTTING OFF THE |
| | LIGHTING. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW ALL CIRCUITING ON PLANS AND |
| | CORRELATE WITH A PANEL SCHEDULE TO BE SUBMITTED AS |
| | REQUESTED ON ALL PREVIOUS REVIEWS. THE RESPONSE |
| | MENTIONS THE CIRCUITING WAS ADDED HOWEVER THESE ARE |
| | BLANK ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE LOADS ON THE EXISTING PANEL WHICH IS |
| | BEING NOTED WITH THE NEW LOADS ADDED. |
| | THE LOAD ON THE CIRCUIT FOR THE A/C IS SHOWN AT 2500VA |
| | WHICH FAR EXCEEDS THE RATING OF A 1-POLE 20AMP BRANCH |
| | CIRCUIT. |
| | 240.4,310.16,408.4, 220.87, 215.5 ETC |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS *ADDITION CONTAINS A SINGLE |
| | INDEPENDENTLY OPERATED LIGHTING SYSTEM* |
| | THIS OFFICE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT THIS RESPONSE IS FOR??? |
| | THE ABOVE SECTIONS GIVEN SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS IS FOR MINIMUM LIGHTING PERFORMANCE |
| | CALCULATIONS PER THE SECTIONS ABOVE FROM THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE. THERE IS NO EXCEPTION FOR INDEPENDENT |
| | SYSTEMS WHICH EXEMPTS LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS |
| | AND ENERGY COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER 13. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: THE ELECTRICAL SHEET WAS REVISED TO INDICATE |
| | CODES HOWEVER THE NFPA-70 DOES NOT SHOW ANY YEAR |
| | EDITION. |
| | PLANS MAY NOT STATE LATEST EDITION AS THE CODES ARE |
| | ALWAYS BEING REVISED. THE CODES ARE BASED ON THE TIME |
| | OF PERMIT APPLICATION PER FS 553.73. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PER NOTICE GIVEN ON PREVIOUS REVIEW A FEE HAS |
| | NOW BEEN ASSESSED PER FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THERE ARE SEVERAL |
| | SECTIONS OF CODES WHICH WERE REPEATED. THE AMOUNT OF |
| | $672 IS DUE BEFORE THE FOLLOWING RESUB. THE RESUB FEE |
| | WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT ** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED |
| | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
