| Date |
Text |
| 2008-11-17 15:04:46 | ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | NO COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW WERE ADDRESSED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE, AS WELL AS REVISED |
| | PLANS, REFLECTING THE FOLLOWING REPEAT COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT (RPD) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO, AND APPROVED |
| | BY, THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO |
| | ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT AND |
| | ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE AREA UPON WHICH THE PROPOSED |
| | GUARD HOUSE IT TO BE LOCATED. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIRECTION (I.E. NORTH, SOUTH, |
| | EAST, OR WEST) ON THE ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN, SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | BY A REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INDICATING WHAT |
| | LANDSCAPING WILL BE PLACED AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF THE |
| | GUARD HOUSE. |
| | |
| | 5) THE MEASURE OF SCALE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN IS |
| | INCORRECT. IMPORTANT - NO SITE PLAN WAS INCLUDED AS |
| | PART OF THE RESUBMITTAL. PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE A |
| | SITE PLAN WITH ALL FUTURE RESUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | 6) THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE GUARD HOUSE DOES NOT WORK. |
| | THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE GUARD HOUSE CONFLICTS WITH |
| | TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, PARKING, ETC. PLEASE CONTACT ME |
| | PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT TO |
| | DISCUSS. |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER, |
| | AT (561) 822-1435. |
