| Date |
Text |
| 2009-09-30 12:56:29 | FAILED. |
| | REVIEWER: DEAN LAUDERMILK, ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEWER, |
| | EMAIL: [email protected], OFFICE: 494-1083 (ENG.), |
| | 805-6716 (CONSTRUCTION SERVICES) |
| | 1-NEEDS FIRE REVIEW, ADDED FIRE HYDRANT. WATER AND |
| | SEWER PLAN ONLY COVERS THIS ITEM SO IT WILL NOT BE |
| | REVIEWED BY ESD. |
| | 2-SHEET S-1: DUMPSTER CAN NOT BE BUILT INSIDE THE FP&L |
| | UTILITY EASEMENT, RELOCATE IT. |
| | 3-SHEET S-1: STREET LIGHT IS SHOWN IN THE AREA BEHIND |
| | THE WHEEL STOP WHERE THE CAR OVERHANGS, RELOCATE TO THE |
| | NORTH. |
| | 4-SHEET S-2: DUMPSTER IS NOT THE REQUIRED SIZE. THE |
| | INTERNAL DIMENSIONS NEED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 12.5??? BY |
| | 12.5???. USE MEASUREMENTS IN CITY DETAIL GC-9 FOUND AT |
| | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/ENGINEERING/STANDARDS/2007_DET |
| | AILS_PDFS/GENERAL_CONSTRUCTION/GC-9.PDF |
| | 5-NEW IMPERVIOUS AND PERVIOUS CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | REQUIRED. AERIAL OF SITE SHOWS EXISTING PARKING LOT IN |
| | THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY IS EXISTING AND IS NOT |
| | SHOWN TO BE REMOVED. |
| | 6-POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT COVER THE PROTECTION |
| | OF THE EXISTING AND NEW CATCH BASINS BEFORE, DURING AND |
| | AFTER CONSTRUCTION. IT MAY BE INCLUDED IN THE NINE PAGE |
| | POLLUTION CONTROL DOCUMENT LISTED AS NOTE 5 ON THE |
| | PLAN, BUT IT WAS NOT INCLUDED WITH THESE PLANS. |
| | 7-12' UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | PROPERTY THAT RUNS FROM OKEECHOBEE SOUTH THAT HAS TREES |
| | IN IT, THIS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS THE UTILITY (FP&L) |
| | SIGNS OFF. |
| | 8-PLANTING THREE TREES ON TOP OF THE WATER AND SEWER |
| | LINES TO THE EXISTING BUILDING, THIS IS NOT ALLOWED. |
| | THE ROOT BALL OF TREES NEED TO BE 5??? FROM THE |
| | UTILITY. |
| | |
| | |
