| Date |
Text |
| 2008-08-06 10:26:28 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1.INCORPORATE HANDWRITTEN CHANGES INTO THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2.DECLARE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC CHAPTER 3. |
| | |
| | 3.SHOW USE OF THIS AREA.A TABLE TOP IS SHOWN; IS |
| | THIS DINING AREA?SHOW PROPSED SEATING FBC11-5, NOTE |
| | WHETHER THIS IS FIXED SEATING OR NON FIXED SEATING. |
| | |
| | 4.SHOW THE DIMENSION BETWEEN COLUMNS, AND THE |
| | DIMENSION FROM EDGE OF TABLE TOP TO WALL. |
| | |
| | 5.DECLARE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC1603.1.4. |
| | |
| | 6.DECLARE GOVERNING CODE INCLUDING 2007 |
| | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7.THE STEEL COLUMNS ARE SHOWN AS "REMOVABLE".WHAT |
| | DOES THIS MEAN?ARE THE STEEL COLUMNS TO BE REMOVED |
| | AND REPLACED BY PRECAST, OR WILL THE PRECAST GO AROUND |
| | THE EXISTING STEEL COLUMNS?ARE THEY STRUCTURAL?WHY |
| | WOULD A STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BE "REMOVABLE"? |
| | |
| | 8.DECLARE DESIGN LOAD CRITERIA, DEAD AND LIVE LOADS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 9.WHAT DO THE LINES REPRESENT?IS THIS A ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN?PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE |
| | SUBSTRATE AT TOP AND BOTTOM.IF YOU USE A 4" SELF |
| | TAPPING SCREW (PLAN STATES SELF TAPING, DO YOU MEAN |
| | SELF TAPPING?), HOW WILL THIS AFFECT THE ROOF DECK? |
| | |
| | 10. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN |
| | AND THE ATTACHMENT DETAIL, TOP AND BOTTOM.SEE ALSO |
| | OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11. PROVIDE A SURVEY OF THIS PROPERTY.BASED ON THE |
| | ENGINEER'S PLAN, THIS PROJECT ENCROACHES THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE.SEE FBC32.SHOW DIMENSION OF ENCROACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 12. PROVIDE AN ELEVATION WITH ALL DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 13. PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL OF THE EXISTING PROJECT |
| | AREA. |
| | |
| | 14. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE ELECTRICAL LAYOUT |
| | PLAN.GRAPHICALLY THE 3.97 DIMENSION IS SHOWN AS |
| | APPROXIMATELY 1/4 OF THE TOTAL WIDTH, BUT THE TOTAL |
| | WIDTH IS SHOWN AS 7'10". |
| | |
| | 15.ARE ANY EXIT DOOR ON THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL |
| | BUILDING LEADING INTO THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREA? |
