| Date |
Text |
| 2009-04-30 09:29:10 | PROCESSED PLANS. |
| | STAMPED ALL SHEETS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH WERE COMPLETED |
| | BY OTHER TRADES. |
| | |
| | THE NEW PERMIT NUMBER 09040579 WAS GENERATED BASED ON |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED BY THE BUILDIGN OFFICIAL |
| | FOR THE SECOND BUILDING. THIS IS1307 HENRIETTA AVE. |
| | EVEN AS THE PERMIT NUMBER IS AFTER MARCH 1ST, 2009 THE |
| | PLANS ARE UNDER 2004 FBC. APPLICATION WOULD HAVE BEEN |
| | MADE UNDER THE PREVIOUS CODE IF THE CONTRACTOR HAD |
| | KNOWN HE NEEDED A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | THE SITE DATA REPORTS FOR RAIN WATER CALCULAITONS WERE |
| | SIGNED BY ENGINEER HOWEVER NOT SEALED. FS 471.025, FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002. |
| | THIS WAS NOTED TO MANUAL GONZALES FROM ENGINEERING. |
| | BOTH REPORTS ARE BEING SENT BACK OUT. THEY NEED TO BE |
| | SEALED CORRECTLY AND SUBMITTED AS A SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | ENGINEERING REVIEW AND STAMPS. |
| | |
| | CIVIL SHEETS NOT STAMPED AS REVIEWED BY ENGINEERING |
| | DEPT. EMAIL WAS FORWARDED TO ENGINEERING STAFF. MAIN |
| | SET ON FILE AT THEIR OFFICE. THE REVIEWS ARE PASSED IN |
| | THE COMPUTER. |
| | |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR UNITS A, B, AND C WERE NOT |
| | STAMPED BY ANY OTHER TRADES WHICH REVIEWED ALTHOUGH |
| | REVIEWS FOR BUILDING, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING ARE |
| | PASSED IN COMPUTER. |
| | THE DATE STAMP AND PERMIT NUMBER STAMP WAS ADDED TO |
| | REPORTS. NO REVIEW OF REPROTSFOR OTHER TRADEAS WAS DONE |
| | BY THIS REVIEWER. |
| | THE ADDRESSED WAS CHANGED BY THIS REVIEWER TO LIST BOTH |
| | NEW ADDRESSES AS 1301 AND 1307 HENRIETTA AVE ON THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. COPIES WERE MADE FOR QUARTERLY |
| | REPORTING TO THE DCA. |
| | |
| | |
