| Date |
Text |
| 2008-07-31 08:35:20 | ZONING REVIEW: FAILED |
| | |
| | ZONING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) AIR RIGHTS EASEMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR AN PORTION |
| | OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WHICH INTRUDES INTO PUBLIC |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. (APPLICATION IN-PROGRESS WITH ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES). |
| | |
| | 2) LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PLANT |
| | MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED ON ROOF LEVEL, INCLUDING |
| | DETAILS FOR PLANTER BOXES/BED. |
| | |
| | 3) ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT, SUCH AS SCORING OR REVEAL |
| | LINES, SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THOSE PORTIONS OF EAST AND |
| | WEST ELEVATIONS WHICH ABUT ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE UTILIZED TO BREAK UP |
| | BLANK WALLS. |
| | |
| | 4) STORAGE AREAS ARE NOT DETAILED. PLESAE CONFIRM IF IT |
| | INTENDED THAT THESE WILL BE CONVERTED TO KITCHEN OR |
| | PREP AREAS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION: |
| | |
| | 4) RAILING AND BALUSTRADE AT TOP OF FRONT ELEVATION SEE |
| | HEAVY AND OVERLY DETAILED FOR ARCHITECTURE OF BUILDING. |
| | GIVEN BALCONY PORTION WILL HANG OVER STREET, ARCHITECT |
| | MAY WISH TO CONSIDER LIGHTER FEATURES WHICH DO NOT |
| | CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ARCHITECTURE OR PROPOSED |
| | ARCHITECTURE OF GAZEBO. |
| | |
| | 5) GAZEBO ELEMENT SEEMS PROPORTIONATELY OUT OF SCALE |
| | WITH THE REST OF THE BUILDING. I CANNOT TELL WHAT THE |
| | EXTRA HEIGHT IS PROVIDING IN TERMS OF THE BAR AREA. |
| | PLEASE LOOK AT THE PROPORTIONS OF THE SPACE AND CONFIRM |
| | THE SCALE IS CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE CONFIRM ARCHITECTURE OF GAZEBO IS CORRECT. |
| | WITH VARYING HEIGHTS AND ARCHITECTURAL STYLES, THE |
| | ELEMENTS SEEM TO BE COMPETING WITH EACH OTHER (FLORIDA |
| | VERNACULAR, ITALIANATE, AND TRADITIONAL MAIN STREET). |
| | |
| | |
| | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
