| Date |
Text |
| 2008-08-26 13:37:38 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE COVER SHEET WHICH STATES |
| | CHAPTER 13 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR |
| | ACCESSIBILITY. THIS NEEDS TO BE CHAPTER 11. IF THIS |
| | WERE THE ONLY COMMENT THE PLANS COULD BE REDLINED |
| | HOWEVER THERE ARE OTHER COMMENTS BELOW WHICH ARE IN |
| | NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS STILL MISSING FROM ALL |
| | NOTATIONS OF ENGINEERING FIRM(S). PLEASE SEE COVER |
| | SHEET WHICH STILL SHOWS HALLBERG ENGINEERING. THIS IS |
| | SHOWN FOR ELECTRICAL AND OTHER TRADES. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FIRE PROTECTION SHEETS WHICH STILL |
| | CONTAIN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM INFORMATION WHICH WOULD |
| | REQUIRE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. |
| | |
| | FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.023 FOR ENGINEERS |
| | FAC61G1-16.004, FS 481.219 FOR ARCHITECTS. |
| | |
| | ** THESE ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND FOR ALL |
| | LOCATIONS ON PLANS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY |
| | THOSE OTHER TRADE REVIEWER(S). |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES FOR LIGHTING |
| | CONTROLS REQUIRED PER FBC 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND |
| | .1.3. PLEASE SEE PLANS AS THERE ARE LOCATIONS IN WHICH |
| | ARE CONSIDERED SEPARATE SPACES AND ONLY STANDARD SINGLE |
| | POLE DEVICES ARE SHOWN. THESE ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND |
| | REQUIRE SOME SORT OF AUTOMATED MEANS FOR CONTROLLING |
| | LIGHTING. IF A SYSTEM IS PROVIDED THEN SEPARATE |
| | CONTROLS OF OVER RIDING THAT SYSTEM IS REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE SEE OTHER AREAS SUCH AS STAGING AREA WHICH ONLY |
| | SEEMS TO SHOW ONE OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICE. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE SPECS ON THIS PROPOSED DEVICE WHICH WILL |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE OVER RIDE FUNCTION. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE ALL FIXTURE DESIGNATIONS ON |
| | PLANS AND CLEARLY INDICATE EACH FIXTURE. FOR EXAMPLE |
| | SOME FIXTURES SUCH AS THE CORELIGHT BRAND DOES NOT |
| | INDICATE ANY CLEAR DELINEATION OF THE FIXTURE. THE |
| | FIXTURE LEGEND NOTES A CERTAIN LENGTH HOWEVER BASED ON |
| | PLANS AND SCALE SHOWN THE LINEAR FEET OF FIXTURES IS |
| | SUBSTANTIALLY MORE THAN WHAT IS LISTED ON LEGEND. THIS |
| | IS ALSO NOTED FOR OTHER FIXTURES SUCH AS THE TRACK |
| | FIXTURE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT SUBMITTED DOES NOT |
| | COORDINATE WITH PLANS. IN FACT THERE ARE FIXTURES SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ONE EXAMPLE OF THIS IS THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHOWN IN |
| | THE IDR. THE LAST REVIEW OF THESE DOCUMENTS DID NOT |
| | INDICATE ANY FIXTURES AND NOW THE FIXTURE WHICH ARE |
| | SHOWN IN THE IDR ARE NOT THE SAME AS FIXTURES ON PLANS. |
| | IN FACT THERE ARE 250WATT FIXTURES AND 300WATT |
| | FIXTURE(S) WHICH ARE NOT IN THE IDR AT ALL AND YET |
| | THESE ARE ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | ANOTHER EXAMPLE IS THE INTERIOR LIGHTS WHICH NEED TO |
| | COORDINATE ALL ZONES AND SPACES. ONE OF THESE IS THE |
| | DESIGNATIONS OF *OFFICES*. THE IDR SHOWS 23 FIXTURES IN |
| | OFFICES AND BASED ON THE SHEET A-2, THERE ARE ONLY TWO |
| | OFFICES AND BOTH OF THEM TOGETHER DO NOT CONTAIN 23 |
| | FIXTURES. |
| | HOW ARE THESE THINGS POSSIBLE? |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES ON PLANS WITH |
| | THE ALLOWANCES. PLEASE SEE TABLE *C* IN 13-415.2.C. IF |
| | *C* METHOD IS CHOSEN THEN THE LIGHTING WATTAGE PER SQ |
| | FT OF THE ENTIRE SPACE MAY NOT EXCEED THE LEVEL OF 1.5 |
| | WATTS PER SQUARE FOOT. |
| | THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTED LIST AS THERE ARE OTHER |
| | INCONSISTENCIES. PLEASE BE SURE TO COORDINATE ALL AND |
| | CALL TO GO OVER HOW TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2,.1.3, 13-415.2.B, |
| | 13-415.2.C ETC. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE AND COMPLETE ALL ROOM AND |
| | AREA DESIGNATIONS AS SHOWN ON A-2 WITH THAT OF |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. ONE EXAMPLE OF THIS IS ROOM 114 WHICH |
| | ON THE A2 SHEET IS SHOWN AS AN ELECTRICAL ROOM AND |
| | NOTES EQUIPMENT ETC. HOWEVER BASED ON THE ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS THIS SAME ROOM DOES NOT SHOW ANY ELECTRICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | 110.26, 240.24, 408.17 ETC |
| | FBC 106.1.1 FOR CLARITY AND COORDINATION. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THE |
| | WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROP NEEDS TO BE SHOWN FOR BRANCH |
| | CIRCUIT(S). THE PLANS ONLY CHANGED TO QUOTE THE |
| | REQUIREMENT AND DID NOT PROVIDE THE INFORMATION. |
| | RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THIS WAS DONE AND COULD BE |
| | FOUND ON E-2 HOWEVER NO VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATION WAS |
| | PLACED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | **IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
