| Date |
Text |
| 2009-09-23 09:53:40 | |
| | ** DENIED ** |
| | |
| | ** ** REVIEW DONE AT THE REQUEST OF THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL FOR PREVIOUS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLANS SUBMITTED DO NOT MATCH. THE REVISED |
| | SHEET E-2 SUBMITTED IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FORM |
| | PREVIOUS SHEET E-2. IN FACT IT IS FOR A DIFFERENT FLOOR |
| | ALTOGETHER. THE TITLE BLOCK INDICATES A REVISION DATE |
| | OF 8/20/08 YET NO REVISIONS WERE MADE TO PLANS |
| | COORDINATING WITH ANY NEW CHANGES FOR ELECTRICAL. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT EVEN THE PREVIOUS E-3 SHEET HAS A |
| | DIFFERENT FLOOR LAYOUT FOR POWER ETC. |
| | THE R2 PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATES PANEL AS *EXISTING* YET |
| | THE FILE SET OF PLANS INDICATES THIS PANEL AS NEW. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ACCURATE LOAD CALCULATIONS. LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS STATE PER NEC 220.87 FOR EXISTING LOADS. |
| | HOWEVER HOW CAN THIS BE POSSIBLE WHEN THE NEW PANEL R2 |
| | WAS ONLY JUST PERMITTED AND NOT YET INSTALLED? HOW |
| | COULD THERE BE AN 24 MONTH DEMAND FROM FPL WHEN THE |
| | PERMITTED LOAD/ADDITION OF FLOOR AND ALL OTHER |
| | ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTED PLANS HAVE NOT |
| | YET BEEN INSTALLED TO DATE. |
| | |
| | *** IT IS TO BE CLEAR THAT THE FILE SET OF PLANS WERE |
| | NOT REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY THIS REVIEWER. ONLY |
| | THE SHEET E-2, E-3 AND PANEL SCHEDULES WERE LOOKED AT |
| | FOR THERE RELEVANT CONTENTS BASED ON THE COORDINATION |
| | OF REVISED DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ** IT SHOULD ALSO BE CLEAR THAT AS THERE IS INFORMATION |
| | NOT YET SHOWN, REVISED OR MISSING ON PLANS THERE MAY BE |
| | NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT |
| | POSSIBLE BE MADE AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
