| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-23 14:55:54 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) SHUTTERS, BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF SEC. R310.4OF 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE IF ALL |
| | OPENINGS ARE GOING TO HAVE SHUTTERS.NEED AT LEAST ONE |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS WHEN SHUTTERS ARE UP. |
| | |
| | 2-TRANSPARENTSHUTTERS: |
| | A) SHUTTERS DRAWINGSSUBMITTED FORTRANSPARENT |
| | SHUTTERSNEED TO BE REVISED. ACCORDING TO FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALFL6417THEAPPROVED DRAWING IS |
| | #03-155-1343B (SEE ATTACHED COPY). DRAWING SUBMITTED |
| | WAS #03-155-1343A.ANCHOR SCHEDULE IS DIFFERENT ON |
| | THIS DRAWINGS. THEREFORE NEED TO USE THE DRAWINGSTHAT |
| | WEREAPPROVED WITHTHE PRODUCT APPROVAL. AND REVISE |
| | ANCHOR SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B)ENGINEER WIND LOADS FOR WALL COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDINGSUBMITTED IS ONLY GOOD FORTRIBUTARY AREA OF |
| | 20S.F..THERE ARE SOME OPENINGS THAT ARE SMALLER THAN |
| | 20S.F. AND DESIGN PRESSURES ARE HIGHER. PROVIDE THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR OPENINGS SMALLER THAN 20S.F. |
| | (THIS APPLIES TO ROLLDOWN SHUTTERS TOO). |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: SEPARATE ENGINEER CALCULATIONS ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED.CONTRACTOR MAY USE COMPONENT AND CLADDING |
| | WIND LOAD TABLESR301.2(2)ANDR301.2(3) OF 2004 |
| | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AS A REFERENCE TO DETERMINE |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE |
| | ATTACHED SAMPLE OR PROVIDE ANY OTHER METHODTHAT |
| | PROVIDESALL THE INFORMATION REQUIREDON THE SAMPLE |
| | PROVIDED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVALPROPOSED |
| | INSTALLATION ANDDESIGN CRITERIA OF SEC. R301 2004 |
| | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. (THIS APPLIES TO ROLL DOWN |
| | SHUTTERS ALSO). |
| | |
| | 3-ROLL DOWN SHUTTERS: |
| | A) CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTINGENGINEER'SPRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL APPROVAL LETTER.THIS LETTER IS NOT REQUIRED, |
| | BUT IF CONTRACTOR WANTS TO SUBMITT LETTER, THEN IT |
| | NEEDS TO BE REVISED.THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | INCORRECT.THERE ARE SOME OPENINGS THAT ARE SMALLER |
| | THAN THE 20 S.F. TRIBUTARY AREASPECIFIED BY THE OTHER |
| | ENGINEER WHO PROVIDED THE DESIGN PRESSURES. SEE ITEM |
| | 2(B) ABOVE. ALSO,THE ANCHOR MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCE |
| | OF 3/4" NEEDS TO BE REVISED AS REQUIRED ON SHEET 05 OF |
| | 11. SEE TYPICAL EDGE DISTANCEIN WOOD NOTE. IT |
| | REQUIRES 1-1/4"EDGE DISTANCE. OTHERWISE A REDUCTION |
| | FACTOR IS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, CLARIFY WHATDOES THE ENGINEER MEANS BY SHUTTER |
| | TO BE INSTALLED "TO EXISTING DADE COUNTY PINE HOST |
| | STRUCTURE",SINCE THIS PROPERTY ISNOT LOCATED IN |
| | DADE COUNTY AND THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT A DADE |
| | COUNTY NOA EITHER. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
