| Date |
Text |
| 2008-06-20 17:20:42 | RESIDENTIAL(R3)ADDITION AND ALTERATION,BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | |
| | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | ***NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AT TIME OF PERMIT |
| | PICK UP. |
| | |
| | 2- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD) TO |
| | VERIFY IF IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS |
| | AND COPY OF PAIDRECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. |
| | |
| | 3- OWES $717.00 FOR RADON FEES AND PERMIT VALUATION |
| | UPGRADE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4-PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS FOR MASTER |
| | BEDROOM WING AREA AND BEDROOMS #2 & #3 WING AREA AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R807 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | (NOTE: THERE IS NOT ACCESS FROM MAIN ROOF TO THIS |
| | AREAS, THAT'S WHY ATTIC ACCESS IS REQUIRED). |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ATTACHMENT OF DECORATIVE |
| | SHUTTERS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMINGPLANS AND DETAILS FOR |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF CUPOLA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE COPIES OF SOIL TEST REPORT. |
| | ***NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW SOIL TEST REPORT AND |
| | FOOTING RECOMENDATIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) GARAGE OVERHEAD DOORS. SEE SIZE SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) ENTRY DOOR. SEE PLANS FOR DOOR SHOWN. |
| | |
| | C) ALL SIMPSON AND USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND DETAILS. PROVIDE ONLY FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE WHERE CONNECTOR IS |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | D) PRECAST LINTELS. |
| | |
| | E) CUPOLALOUVERS. SEE ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 9- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 10 - ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) CEILING INSULATION VALUE (R-19) DOESN'T MATCH |
| | INSULATION VALUE SHOWN ON PLANS (R-30). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORMS. |
| | |
| | C) SEE COMMENTS FROMMECHANICAL REVIEWERREGARDING |
| | THE CROSS VENTILATION CREDIT. |
| | |
| | D) WALL TYPES IS MISSING THE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | THE ADJACENT WALL IN GARAGE AREA. |
| | |
| | 11- TRUSS PACKAGE: |
| | A) NEEDS ENGINEER ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, NOT COPY. |
| | SEC. 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | B) TRUSS PACKAGE DOESN'T COMPLY WITHFLORIDA |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-31.003(5).MISSING THE |
| | ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND SHEETS ARE NOT PROPERLY |
| | NUMBERED TO MATCH THE INDEX SHEET. ALSO, ENGINEER'S |
| | SIGNATURE IS NOT ORIGINAL. AND MISSING THE DATE WHEN |
| | THEY WERE SIGNED. |
| | NOTE: ONE SET OF TRUSS PACKAGE WILL BE RETAINED IN |
| | THIS OFFICE TO BE SEND TO THE BOARD OF ENGINEER'S FOR |
| | REVIEW.ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS ARE ALWAYS SUBMITTED |
| | WITHOUT THE REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | C)TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED FOR EXPOSURE "C" AS |
| | SPECIFIED ON SHEET S-2. |
| | |
| | D) ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 12-SHEET A-2: |
| | A) UPDATE BUILDING CODE INFORMATION. CORRECT |
| | INFORMATION IS FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS, NOT 2006. |
| | |
| | B) MEAN ROOF HEIGHT SHOWNABOVE THE DEMOLITION |
| | NOTES IS 21.5',WHILE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT SHOWN ON |
| | ENGINEERING CRITERIA IS 15' REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) WINDOWS AND DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON |
| | ENGINEERING CRITERIA DON'T MATCHDESIGN PRESSURES |
| | SHOWN ON NOTES ABOVE ROOM FINISH NOTES. SEE PLANS FOR |
| | HIGHLIGHTED COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) WHAT DOESBUILDING CATERY IV B SHOWN ON |
| | ENGINEERING CRITERIA STANDS FOR? |
| | |
| | E) ENGINEERING CRITERIA CALLS FOR SHUTTERS, WHILE |
| | DOORS AND WINDOWS NOTES CALL FOR IMPACT GLASS. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 13- SHEET A-5: |
| | A) SPECIFY SIZE OF ATTIC VENTILATION TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R806. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAIL SPACING TO COMPLY WITH |
| | SEC. R803.2.3.1. INCLUDE NAILING SPACING ON ROOF ZONE |
| | 3. |
| | |
| | C)SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING IN WALL SECTIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R602.1.2. |
| | |
| | D) NEW KNEE WALL OVER EXISTING ROOF RAFTER: CLARIFY |
| | WHY USING ONLY ONE BOTTOM PLATE AND ONE TOP PLATE IF |
| | THIS IS A BEARING WALL.ALSO, NOTE THAT BOTTOM PLATE |
| | IS NO SUPPORTED ON CONTINUOUS BASE. SINGLE PLATE MAY |
| | NOT BE ADEQUATE TO SUPPORT TRUSSES.ALSO, SPECIFY HOW |
| | IS THE KNEE WALL DESIGNED TO RESIST THE UPLIFT LOADS IF |
| | THERE ARE NO HURRICANE STRAPS SPECIFIED.SEC. 106.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R601.2. |
| | |
| | 14- SHEET S-2: |
| | A) REVISE CODE EDITIONON UPLIFT CALCULATIONS |
| | CHART.USE FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS, NOT 2006. |
| | |
| | B) UPDATE NOTE #6 OF DESIGN PARAMETERS. SEE 2004 |
| | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND CITE 2004 CODE, NOT 2001. |
| | |
| | C) CONNECTOR #3 DOESN'T RESIST THE UPLIFT LOADS |
| | CALCULATED FOR TRUSS GIRDER ABOVE BEDROOM #4. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D) SPECIFY CONNECTORS AT BOTH ENDS OF GIRDER TRUSS |
| | ABOVE MASTER BATHROOM. MISSING ONE CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | E) SPECIFY CONNECTORS FOR TRUSSES AT THE FRONT |
| | PORCH. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
