| Date |
Text |
| 2008-08-27 10:25:31 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ****BUILDING REVISION #1**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1.PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO SCOPE OF WORK.DETAILS |
| | FOR INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALLS ARE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | PLAN AS WELL AS NOTES REGARDING WINDOW REPLACEMENT, BUT |
| | A1 STATES THAT INTERIOR WALLS ARE BEING REPLACED WITH |
| | NO REFERENCE TO EXTERIOR WALLS OTHER THAN STUCCO. |
| | PLEASE REVISE TO CLARIFY SCOPE FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 2.BUILDING TYPE IIA IS DECLARED ON THE PLAN IN ONE |
| | PLACE ON SHEET A1, BUT CODE INFORMATION STATES THIS IS |
| | 3B; SEE FBC*106, FBC CHAPTER 5.THE DESIGNER SHOULD |
| | DECLARE MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE REQUIRED BY CODE; THIS IS |
| | R3 OCCUPANCY SO IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY IIA (NON |
| | COMBUSTIBLE AND FIRE RESISTANCE RATED STRUCTURAL |
| | ELEMENTS) AND IIIB HAVE BOTH BEEN DECLARED.DETAILS ON |
| | THE PLAN SUCH AS 1-A1 SHOW USE OF COMBUSTIBLES. |
| | |
| | 3.A CHANGE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK IS A REVISION, NOT A |
| | SUBMITTAL.FEES DUE.FAILURE TO PAY FEES AT TIME OF |
| | SUBMITTAL MAY RESULT IN DELAYS AS REVIEWS ARE NOT TO BE |
| | COMPLETED UNTIL ALL FEES ARE PAID. |
| | |
| | 4.THE VALUE HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO $40,000.ADDITIONAL |
| | FEES DUE. |
| | |
| | 5.WINDOWS, DOORS, IMPACT PROTECTION ARE TO BE ON A |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT.NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 6.PROVIDE DESIGN LOADS FOR ROOF FRAMING; LATERAL, |
| | PARALLEL, AND UPLIFT, FBC R 301. |
| | |
| | 7. 1-A1 STATES THAT THE WALL FRAMING WILL BE FASTENED |
| | INTO THE SLAB, BUT THE GRAPHIC AND OTHER DETAILS SHOW |
| | FLOOR JOISTS. |
| | |
| | 8. A-A2 STATES THAT THE ENTIRE ROOF IS NAILED AS AN END |
| | ZONE.END ZONES ARE TO BE NAILED AT 4" ON THE |
| | PERIMETER OF THE SHEET, NOT 6".FBC R803.2.3.1. |
| | |
| | 9. A-A2 STATES: "EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH |
| | EXISTING OVER 30# . . . "; IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE |
| | SHINGLES ARE EXISTING, OR A REPAIR, OR NEW.IF THIS IS |
| | A REPAIR, HOW MUCH WILL BE REPAIRED, FBC EB 511. |
| | CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 10. THE FLOOR JOISTS FOR THIS HOUSE ARE 2X6S, BUT THE |
| | PLAN SHOWS 2X4S.THE ENGINEER IS TO CONFIRM THAT ALL |
| | INFORMATION ON THE PLAN IS CORRECT.IT DOES NOT APPEAR |
| | THAT 2X4 FLOOR JOISTS MEET THE DEAD LOAD, LIVE LOAD, |
| | AND DEFLECTION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11.FOR THE PROPOSED 2X4 FLOOR JOISTS IN THE REPAIR |
| | AREA, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH DEAD |
| | LOADS, LIVE LOADS, AND DEFLECTION.SEE FBC |
| | R502.2.2(1). |
| | |
| | 12.SPECIFY SPECIES OF LUMBER. |
| | |
| | 13.THE FLOOR JOIST REPAIR AREA STATES "FIELD VERIFY |
| | ATTACHMENT AND REDO IF POSSIBLE."WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? |
| | YOU ARE INSTALLING NEW FLOOR JOISTS; ATTACHMENT IS NOT |
| | OPTIONAL. |
| | |
| | 14.THE PROPOSED 2X4 FLOOR JOISTS ARE SUPPORTING A |
| | BEARING WALL.PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT THE |
| | 2X4S ARE STRUCTURALLY ADEQUATE, FBC R301, FBC EB707.2. |
| | |
| | 15.AN INTERIOR WALL DETAIL WAS PROVIDED; IS THIS THE |
| | DETAIL FOR THE BEARING WALL?REPAIR AREA INCLUDES A |
| | PORTION OF THE BEARING WALL. |
| | |
| | 16.THE REPAIR AREA INCLUDES AN OPENING (A DOOR) IN |
| | THE BEARING WALL.PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 17.ARE THE CEILINGS BEING REPLACED?NOTE ON THE |
| | PLAN, COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER 13 CANNOT BE |
| | DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 18.A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.TWO SETS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
