| Date |
Text |
| 2008-09-23 13:11:40 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1. ALL CHANGES TO THE ISSUED PERMIT ARE CONSIDERED |
| | REVISIONS AND APPROPRIATE FEES SHOULD BE PAID AT THE |
| | TIME OF SUBMITTAL. A BILL IS ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | 2. FBC CHAPTER 35, INCORRECT VERSION OF ASCE7 DECLARED |
| | (SHOULD BE ASCE7-02 RATHER THAN -05), FBC1609. |
| | |
| | 3. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE MULLIONS, FAC9B72. IF A FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THIS PRODUCT, |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUIDLING.ORG, A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED, HTTP://WWW.DCA.STATE.FL.US/F |
| | BC/COMMITTEES/PRODUCT_APPROVAL/LOCAL%20PRODUCT%20APPROV |
| | AL%20APPL%20080103.PDF. |
| | |
| | PROOF OF QUALITY ASSUANCE, COMPLETED APPLICATION, MUST |
| | BE SUBMITTED AS WELL AS ENGINEERING. THE ENGINEERING |
| | SUBMITTED STATES "ALLOY 6061-T6 IS ASSUMED ALLOY AS |
| | THIS IS MOST COMMON ALLOY USED FOR ALUMINUM DRAWN |
| | TUBE." COMPONENTS AND CLADDING ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE |
| | FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL; ENGINEERING |
| | WITH ASSUMPTIONS REGARDING MATERIALS USED CANNOT BE |
| | SUBMITTED. ENGINEERING MUST PROVIDE INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING THE MATERIALS ACTUALLY USED. |
| | |
| | 4. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 IS |
| | REQUIRED ON EACH SHEET (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION, |
| | PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE PERSON SEALING |
| | THE DOCUMENT). |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE CONFIRM EXPOSURE B CONDITIONS. NOTE THAT PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER AERIALS SHOW SOME OF |
| | THE BUILDINGS ADJACENT TO A GOLF COURSE WHICH APPEARS |
| | TO CREATE EXPOSURE C CONDITIONS FOR SOME OF THE |
| | BUILDING ELEVATIONS. IF NECESSARY, PROVIDE A SITE PLAN |
| | SHOWING THIS BUILDING LOCATION; USE OF AERIALS IS |
| | ACCEPTABLE. FBC1603.1.4, FBC1609.4(3). |
| | |
| | 6. THE REVISION SUBMITTED, SHEET S1 4/25/07, STATES |
| | THAT "EXISTING STRUCTURAL MULLION TO REMAIN". THE FLOOR |
| | PLAN SHOWS THE MULLION AS AN EXISTING STRUCTURAL |
| | MULLION. PLEASE REVISE OTHER DOCUMENTS TO REFLECT THIS |
| | CHANGE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK; FBC*106, FBC16. DURING THE |
| | PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, I WAS TOLD BY THE CONTRACTOR THAT |
| | THIS WAS A STEEL STRUCTURAL MULLION/COLUMN. IF THIS IS |
| | A STRUCTURAL COLUMN, ALL LOADS MUST BE CONSIDERED |
| | |
| | 7. NOTE THAT THE DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE MULLIONS, |
| | +33.7/-44 IS LESS THAN THE DESIGN PRESSURES INITIALLY |
| | DECLARED FOR THE JOB, +39.5/-52.9 (REPORT, PAGE 2, |
| | CONCLUSIONS). |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE CLARIFY; THE MULLION CALCULATIONS STATE THAT |
| | ATTACHMENT IS INTO CONCRETE. IS THIS AT BOTH THE TOP |
| | AND BOTTOM? |
