| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-30 10:51:40 | REVIEW #: 2ND |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS |
| | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN |
| | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. |
| | |
| | 1. OK |
| | |
| | 2. NOT E ON FAN SCHEDULE SAYS ?PROTECT ALL RATED WALLS |
| | WITH FIRE/SMOKE AS REQUIRED BY CODE.? THIS NOTE IS NOT |
| | IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE. THE |
| | SPECIFIC LOCATION OF EACH FIRE DAMPER, CEILING DAMPER |
| | AND SMOKE DAMPER SHALL BE SHOWN AND PROPERLY IDENTIFIED |
| | ON THE BUILDING PLANS BY THE DESIGNER IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH FBCM 607.8. |
| | |
| | 3. SIZE OF SOME RETURN AIR FLEX DUCTS STILL MISSING ON |
| | PLANS. THE TWO MAIN FLEX RETURN DUCTS FROM THE MAIN |
| | RETURN TRUNK LINE TO THE DOUBLE 24X24 GRILLS IN THE |
| | HALL DO NOT HAVE A SIZE SHOWN ON PLANS. ALSO, THE |
| | RETURN FLEX IN CONFERENCE ROOM 106 NOW HAS TWO SIZES. |
| | IN ONE LOCATION IT IS SHOWN AS 12 INCH AND IN ANOTHER |
| | IT IS SHOWN AS 8 INCH. WHICH IS CORRECT? PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY, SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 601.4. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, MOHS LAB 107 HAS A NOTE FOR 150 CFM. DOES |
| | THIS APPLY TO THE SUPPLY REGISTER OR THE EXHAUST FAN? |
| | THE DUCT SIZE FOR THIS SUPPLY REGISTER IS MISSING FROM |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4. OK |
| | |
| | 5. OK |
| | |
| | 6. IN MOHS LAB 107 THERE IS AN EXHAUST FAN SHOWN IN THE |
| | CEILING. IS THIS THE SAME TYPE OF FAN AS EF-1 ON THE |
| | FAN SCHEDULE OR IS IT A 150 CFM FAN AS THE NOTE ON THE |
| | FLOOR PLAN INDICATES? WHERE IS THE DUCT FOR THIS FAN |
| | AND WHAT SIZE IS THE DUCT? SEE COMMENT #2 ABOVE FOR |
| | ISSUES RELATED TO EXHAUST FAN DUCTWORK. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | RONALD J. REGUEIRO |
| | 561.805.6719 |
| | [email protected] |
