| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-05 10:14:07 | ** DENIEDAUDIT ** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NOTICE TO BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH THE SIGNED AFFIDAVITS. PLEASE |
| | SEE THESE SHOW SEPARATE PRIVATE PROVIDERS AS THE |
| | RESPONSIBLE ENGINEERS. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT. |
| | FS 553.791 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE AFFIDAVITS DO NOT LIST THE |
| | ENERGY/PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. |
| | FS553.791 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE COPY OF THE CALCULATIONS |
| | DATED 2/4/08 WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH |
| | FOLLOWS DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH LIGHTING ON PLANS. IN |
| | FACT THERE ARE SEVERAL LIGHT FIXTURES ON PLANS WHICH |
| | ARE NOT ON THE IDR. |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: PLANS CLEARLY SHOW EXTERIOR |
| | LIGHTS, HOWEVER THE IDR DO NOT INDICATE ANY LIGHTS. |
| | THIS IS ACTUALLY BLANK. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3. |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | TRACK LIGHTS ARE NOT SHOWN PER 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2. |
| | |
| | ** THESE ARE ONLY SOME EXAMPLES AND IS NOT AN EXHAUSTED |
| | LIST OF ALL ITEMS WHICH DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. THERE |
| | IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION FOR REVIEW OF THE REQUIRED |
| | LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM. THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES |
| | THREE OVER RIDES WERE ADDED HOWEVER WHERE ARE THE |
| | LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, |
| | .1.3 AND .1.4? |
| | THERE ARE A COUPLE OF NOTES ON PLANS WHICH MENTIONS |
| | THERE WILL BE SOME SORT OF LIGHTING CONTROLS HOWEVER |
| | PLACING NOTES ON PLANS IN LIEU OF SHOWING CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER ALSO STATES IT IS *NOT CAPABLE* TO |
| | SHOW ZONES. THIS OFFICE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HOW MEETING |
| | * MINIMUM REQUIRED* BY CODE IS NOT POSSIBLE. |
| | ONE AGAIN PLEASE SHOW COMPLETE LIGHTING CONTROL(S) |
| | SYSTEM(S) PER SECTIONS GIVEN ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SECTION NOTED ABOVE FOR EXTERIOR |
| | LIGHTS PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE WITH ONE OF THE TWO MINIMUM REQUIRED BY |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENT #9 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE SEE ONCE AGAIN THESE ARE *STANDARD SWITCHES* |
| | BEING NOTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | SEE NOTE #4 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE TO FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH |
| | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE IS |
| | GIVEN. |
| | FS 553.80(2)(B) IS APPLICABLE TO ANY PROJECT AS IT IS |
| | FOR THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT |
| | COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE |
| | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. |
| | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
