| Date |
Text |
| 2008-11-19 08:54:19 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1-5.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6.) PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT FBC1802.2. TWO |
| | ORIGINALS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, SEE THE SOILS REPORT AND FAC61G15-23.002, |
| | ENGINEERING REPORTS MUST BE SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED ON |
| | A SIGNATURE PAGE OR COVER LETTER BY EACH PROFESSIONAL |
| | ENGINEER WHO IS IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF ANY PORTION OF |
| | THE REPORT, AND IF PRACTICING THROUGH A DULY AUTHORIZED |
| | ENGINEERING BUSINESS, THE NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE |
| | OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS. |
| | THE SIGNATURES ARE TO BE ORIGINALS, NOT PHOTOCOPIES. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NOT INCLUDED |
| | ON THE REPORT AND SIGNATURE IS A PHOTOCOPY, |
| | FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 7.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8.) PARKING STRIPING IS TO COMPLY WITH CITY OF WEST |
| | PALM BEACH STANDARD, SEE ATTACHED DETAIL. REVISE C1. |
| | |
| | ENGINEER?S RESPONSE IS THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL |
| | ADDRESS. AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS REQUIRED, AS WELL AS |
| | ACCESSIBLE PARKING. THEREFORE, IT APPEARS THAT THE SITE |
| | PLAN PREPARED BY AB DESIGN IS REQUIRED FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | SHEET 1, THE PARKING DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE |
| | PLAN ON THE SAME PAGE. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A WHEEL |
| | STOP, PARKING DETAIL SHOWS A VEHICLE OVERHANG. |
| | COMPLIANCE NOT CLEAR, SEE FBC11-4.6.3, OVERHANG SHALL |
| | NOT REDUCE THE CLEAR WIDTH OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. |
| | |
| | SEE ALSO COMMENT 23 FROM FIRST LIST; SHOW THE WIDTH OF |
| | THE SIDEWALK (ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING TO THE |
| | FRONT ENTRY), FBC11-4.6.2(1). |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, SIDEWALK WIDTH NOT INDICATED |
| | FBC11-4.6.2(1). STRIPING DETAIL NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | CITY STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 9-22.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 23.) FROM FIRST LIST; COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. SHOW THE |
| | SIDEWALK WIDTH ON THE PLAN, SIDEWALK BETWEEN ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING AND THE BUILDING. C1 SHOWS A 44INCH SIDEWALK, |
| | WITH A NOTE "SIDEWALK AS SHOWN ON PLAN" BUT THE |
| | ENGINEER'S PLAN DOESN'T SHOW ANY SIDEWALKS. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S PLAN DOES NOT DIMENSION THE |
| | SIDEWALK ALTHOUGH IT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND THERE |
| | IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PARKING DETAIL AND THE |
| | PARKING SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, BOTH ON AB DESIGN PAGE |
| | 1. THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS A VEHICLE OVERHANG, PLAN |
| | SHOWS A WHEEL STOP. SEE FBC11-4.6.3, VEHICLE OVERHANGS |
| | CANNOT REDUCE THE CLEAR WIDTH. DESIGN INTENT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, ENGINEER REMOVED SIDEWALK FROM PLAN, |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED BY |
| | CONTRACTOR. PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, CIVIL SHEETS SUBMITTED AND OTHER SITE PLANS |
| | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED REMOVED. THE NEW SHEETS DO NOT |
| | SHOW THE SIDEWALK WIDTH, FBC11-4.6.2(1), SEE ALSO |
| | COMMENT 8. |
| | |
| | 24-29.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 30.) THE PREVIOUS LISTS STATED THAT THE SHOWER BATHROOM |
| | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE, NOT ADAPTABLE. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN |
| | REVISED TO MAKE THIS ROOM ACCESSIBLE, BUT THE NOTE |
| | STATING THIS IS ADAPTABLE IS STILL ON THE PLAN. PLEASE |
| | REVISE TO REMOVE THIS NOTE. |
| | |
| | 31.) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE TOILETS, LAVATORIES, GRAB |
| | BARS, MIRRORS, FBC 11. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, THE W/C IS SHOWN AS 1'4" FROM WALL, 18" |
| | REQUIRED, FBC11-4.16.2. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 32-39.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 40.) AS DISCUSSED, ALL GLAZING WILL BE IMPACT RATED. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STOREFRONT |
| | GLASS AND FRONT DOOR. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FBC*106. |
| | |
| | 41.) FOR THE ROOF, SELECT THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND |
| | SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR ZONES 2 AND 3. THIS CAN |
| | BE DONE AT THE TIME OF ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ROOF HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM |
| | THE PACKAGE. THIS IS REQUIRED, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD. OTHER INFORMATION (ASSEMBLY, ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING) CAN BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ROOF PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 42.) SOME OF THE NOAS SUBMITTED ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE LEGIBLE COPIES. THEY MAY BE AVAILABLE AT |
| | WWW.BUILDINGCODEONLINE.COM. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ROLLUP DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL. IT IS |
| | ILLEGIBLE AND I CANNOT FIND/READ DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | PLEASE MARK ON THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL WHICH |
| | PRODUCT YOU ARE USING AND SUBMIT COMPLETE, LEGIBLE |
| | DOCUMENTS FOR THAT PRODUCT. THIS IS AVAILABLE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, THE GARAGE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS A |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF +-30PSF. +33.7/-36.7 |
| | REQUIRED, SEE PAGE A3. |
| | |
| | 43.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 44-45.) AS DISCUSSED, ALL GLAZING WILL BE IMPACT RATED. |
| | |
| | 46-51.) ADDRESSED. |
