| Date |
Text |
| 2008-07-01 08:52:42 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LISTS: |
| | |
| | 1. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT AND SUBMITTED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS |
| | FS481. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - SHEET S3, SHOWING LOCATION OF |
| | IMPROVEMENTS, IS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER BUT NOT |
| | SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED.THE PERMIT IS TO CLEARLY |
| | SHOW SCOPE OF WORK; THEREFORE A LOCATION PLAN IS |
| | REQUIRED.THIS SHOULD BE DONE BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD OR DELEGATED ENGINEER.IF DONE BY A DELEGATED |
| | ENGINEER, IT SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH OF THE MECHANICAL ROOMS ARE TO BE |
| | INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT.S3 IS A ROOF FRAMING PLAN |
| | SHOWING THE FRAMING FOR THE ENTIRE ROOF.PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - SAME ROOF PLAN SUBMITTED.PROVIDE AN |
| | OVERALL ROOF PLAN WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS LOCATION OF |
| | PROPOSED REPAIRS.DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT |
| | OR ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE |
| | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS FS471, FS481. |
| | |
| | 2.ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3.FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED, |
| | FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, WHICH |
| | WOULD INCLUDE WALL PANELS, ROOF COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| | (ROOF COVER, NOT DECK UNLESS THE DECK IS ALSO ACTING AS |
| | ROOF COVER), LOUVERS IF NEW LOUVERS ARE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - SOMEONE WROTE "TOWN & COUNTY 5 RIB ROOF |
| | PANELS SEE ATTTACHED PROD APPROVAL" ON A PHOTOCOPY OF A |
| | PORTION OF THE ROOF PLAN.NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED.PLEASE PRINT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL ALONG |
| | WITH ALL ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS (EVALUATION REPORT, |
| | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS) FROM THE WEBSITE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.THE ENGINEER IS TO REVIEW THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS, FBC*106.3.3 (SHOP DRAWING REVIEW |
| | STAMP OR LETTER OR INCORPORATE REFERENCE INTO SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED PLAN). |
| | |
| | 4-6. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7. THE ORIGINAL PERMIT PACKAGE WAS NOT SUBMITTED.OLD |
| | SHEETS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE, AND THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION IS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, THE ORIGINAL PERMIT PACKAGE WAS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED.WHEN RESUBMITTING, PICK UP THE ORIGINAL |
| | PERMIT PACKAGE FROM THE FRONT DESK.PROVIDE TWO |
| | IDENTICAL, COLLATED SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS.OLD |
| | SHEETS ARE TO BE MARKED "VOID" AND SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REFERENCE.THIS WAS DONE FOR THIS REVIEW AS A |
| | COURTESY, BUT DUE TO WORK LOAD WE ARE UNABLE TO DO THIS |
| | FOR EVERY PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 8.ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9.EXISTING CONDITIONS NOT CLEAR.SEE ENGINEERING |
| | CALCS SHEET 3 AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHEET S3 (PREPARED |
| | BY DE BRITT & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS).IT APPEARS THAT |
| | ADDITIONAL FRAMING MEMBERS WERE ADDED GRAPHICALLY.THE |
| | ALTERED PLAN SHOWS ROOF BEAMS WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH |
| | SHEET 3 OF CALCS.SHEET 3 STATES THAT 9.75' SPAN DOES |
| | NOT WORK FOR COMPONENT & CLADDING WIND PRESSURES, AND |
| | NEW DECK SPAN IS 4.8'.THE EXISTING PLAN APPEARS TO |
| | SHOW ONE ROOF FRAMING MEMBER IN THE CENTER, WHICH DOES |
| | NOT APPEAR ON THE NEW PLAN.DOES THIS GET REMOVED? SEE |
| | SHEET S1 PREPARED BY PBSJ, WHICH STATES "3ALL STEEL |
| | BEAMS ARE EXISTING".IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY S1 SHOWS THE |
| | ROOF FRAMING AS EXISTING AND NO CHANGES TO BE DONE, BUT |
| | THE CALCS SHEET 03 SHOW THAT A TOTAL OF 8 ROOF JOISTS |
| | ARE TO BE INSTALLED (EXISTING FRAMING HAS ONLY 3).IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR WHY THE CALCS WOULD INDICATE THAT |
| | ADDITIONAL REINFORCEMENT IS NEEDED, BUT THE PLAN (WHICH |
| | IS WHAT THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTOR WILL USE TO DO THE |
| | WORK) DO NOT SHOW THIS REINFORCEMENT. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED.PLANS SHOW ROOF PANELS OVER |
| | EXISTING, BUT CALCS STATE THAT EXISTING SPAN DOES NOT |
| | WORK.PLEASE SEE CALCULATIONS.SEE ALSO FBC EB |
| | 407.1.2, FBC EB 507.2.IT IS NOT CLEAR IF DESIGNER HAS |
| | DETERMINED THIS TO BE A REPAIR OR LEVEL 1 ALTERATION, |
| | BUT BASED ON CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IT APPEARS THAT |
| | ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL WORK MUST BE DONE.PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 10-11. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
