| Date |
Text |
| 2008-04-18 09:09:05 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT AND SUBMITTED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS |
| | FS481. |
| | |
| | SHEET S3, SHOWING LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS, IS PREPARED |
| | BY AN ENGINEER BUT NOT SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED.THE |
| | PERMIT IS TO CLEARLY SHOW SCOPE OF WORK; THEREFORE A |
| | LOCATION PLAN IS REQUIRED.THIS SHOULD BE DONE BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD OR DELEGATED ENGINEER.IF DONE BY A |
| | DELEGATED ENGINEER, IT SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH OF THE MECHANICAL ROOMS ARE TO BE |
| | INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT.S3 IS A ROOF FRAMING PLAN |
| | SHOWING THE FRAMING FOR THE ENTIRE ROOF.PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2.ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3.FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED, |
| | FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMITTED.THIS IS REQUIRED |
| | FOR ALL COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE |
| | WALL PANELS, ROOF COMPONENTS & CLADDING (ROOF COVER, |
| | NOT DECK UNLESS THE DECK IS ALSO ACTING AS ROOF COVER), |
| | LOUVERS IF NEW LOUVERS ARE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 4-6. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 7. THE ORIGINAL PERMIT PACKAGE WAS NOT SUBMITTED.OLD |
| | SHEETS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE, AND THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION IS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 8.THE SCOPE OF WORK HAS CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION.THE WORK AS SHOWN IS NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE |
| | OF A SHEET METAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE, LIGHT GAGE METAL |
| | ONLY, FS489.A ROOF PERMIT AND A STRUCTURAL PERMIT |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 9.EXISTING CONDITIONS NOT CLEAR.SEE ENGINEERING |
| | CALCS SHEET 3 AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHEET S3 (PREPARED |
| | BY DE BRITT & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS).IT APPEARS THAT |
| | ADDITIONAL FRAMING MEMBERS WERE ADDED GRAPHICALLY.THE |
| | ALTERED PLAN SHOWS ROOF BEAMS WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH |
| | SHEET 3 OF CALCS.SHEET 3 STATES THAT 9.75' SPAN DOES |
| | NOT WORK FOR COMPONENT & CLADDING WIND PRESSURES, AND |
| | NEW DECK SPAN IS 4.8'.THE EXISTING PLAN APPEARS TO |
| | SHOW ONE ROOF FRAMING MEMBER IN THE CENTER, WHICH DOES |
| | NOT APPEAR ON THE NEW PLAN.DOES THIS GET REMOVED? SEE |
| | SHEET S1 PREPARED BY PBSJ, WHICH STATES "3ALL STEEL |
| | BEAMS ARE EXISTING".IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY S1 SHOWS THE |
| | ROOF FRAMING AS EXISTING AND NO CHANGES TO BE DONE, BUT |
| | THE CALCS SHEET 03 SHOW THAT A TOTAL OF 8 ROOF JOISTS |
| | ARE TO BE INSTALLED (EXISTING FRAMING HAS ONLY 3).IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR WHY THE CALCS WOULD INDICATE THAT |
| | ADDITIONAL REINFORCEMENT IS NEEDED, BUT THE PLAN (WHICH |
| | IS WHAT THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTOR WILL USE TO DO THE |
| | WORK) DO NOT SHOW THIS REINFORCEMENT. |
| | |
| | 10.PLEASE REMOVE HVHZ FROM DESIGN CRITERIA.IN THE |
| | PAST THERE HAVE BEEN SOME SIGNIFICANT DESIGN |
| | DIFFERENCES IN HVHZ, AND SOME HAVE NOT BEEN MORE |
| | STRINGENT (FOR INSTANCE, A STRESS INCREASE FOR STEEL |
| | WHICH WAS NEVER PERMITTED IN FBC2001 OR 2004). |
| | THEREFORE, DESIGN IS TO BE DONE TO FBC2004 MINIMUM. |
| | |
| | 11.PT WOOD NAILERS ARE SHOWN.PROVIDE ENOUGH |
| | INFORMATION ABOUT THIS BUILDING TO SHOW THAT |
| | COMBUSTIBLES ARE PERMITTED.IF THIS IS A TYPE I OR II |
| | BUILDING, THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE PERMITTED IN |
| | FBC603.1.IF THIS IS NOT A TYPE I OR II BUILDING, |
| | PROVIDE A CODE SUMMARY (BUILDING TYPE FBC6, BUILDING |
| | HEIGHT AND AREA FBC5, SPRINKLER INFORMATION, OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION FBC 3 AND AREA PER OCCUPANCY) TO SHOW |
| | THAT COMBUSTIBLES CAN BE USED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
