| Date |
Text |
| 2008-09-03 15:10:18 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL COMMENTS FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | THERE ARE ALSO SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON NEW |
| | INFORMATION AND/OR DOCUMENTS AS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW A RESPONSE LETTER IS NOT REQUIRED |
| | HOWEVER IS MOST HELPFUL IN ANY REVIEW PROCESS OF PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: THE BASE BUILDING HAS NOT OBTAINED ANY |
| | CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AT THIS TIME. PLEASE SEE THIS |
| | NOTE FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. AS STATED PREVIOUSLY THE |
| | BASE BUILDING DESIGN TEAM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| | BUILDING UNTIL C OF C. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE APPLIED SCOPE OF |
| | WORK IS BEING APPLIED IS NOT PERMITTED AT THIS TIME. |
| | PLEASE ALSO KNOW ONCE THE SHELL BUILDING IS ISSUED AND |
| | THE BUILD OUT SCOPE OF WORK IS BEING DONE IN THIS SHELL |
| | WHICH DOES NOT CONTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THE |
| | BUILD OUT PLANS SHALL CONTAIN A STAMP AND SIGNATURE |
| | FROM THE BASE BUILDING DESIGNERS OF RECORD FOR EACH |
| | TRADE SHEET. THIS BUILDING WOULD STILL BE UNDER THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN TEAM AND ANY |
| | BUILD OUT WORK WOULD NEED TO BE NOTED. THIS STAMP WOULD |
| | BE A *SHOP DRAWING * REVIEW STAMPED OR OTHER MEANS |
| | WHICH MAY BE GONE OVER. |
| | ** THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND ALL REVIEWER(S) |
| | WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER TRADES. |
| | THE BASE BUILDING PERMIT # IS 07100650 WHICH AS OF THIS |
| | REVIEW ON 2/9/08 HAS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED BEFORE |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: THIS NOTE ALSO STILL REMAINS FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW AS THERE ARE DOCUMENTS STILL SUBMITTED WITH ANY |
| | ADDRESS OF 4354. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE ADDRESS OF PROJECT. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | COVER SHEET OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS CONTAINS 9847 |
| | OKEECHOBEE BLVD, YET THE OTHER TITLE BLOCKS IN SETS |
| | CONTAIN 4354 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.5 ADMIN SECTION AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY |
| | OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | *FOR COORDINATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: THIS NOTE REMAINS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLANS |
| | STILL DO NOT INDICATE ALL CODES AS GIVEN ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT CODES ARE STATED |
| | ON PLANS. |
| | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS. (PLANS SHOW 2006 REVISIONS) |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 |
| | |
| | ** THIS IS REQUIRED ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS AS WELL AS |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COVER PAGE. |
| | FBC 106.5, 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: ** THIS NOTE REMAINS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS IN FACT CONTAIN THE PREVIOUS |
| | *PHOTO-COPIED* FORM *C* AND NOW NEW METHOD *A* |
| | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE ONLY SUBMIT THE *ONE* WHICH MEETS CODE. HOW CAN |
| | METHOD *A* BE SUBMITTED WHEN THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS IN |
| | THE INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH ARE BLANK. THE METHOD *A* |
| | IS FOR *WHOLE BUILDING* COMPLIANCE. HOW CAN THIS BE |
| | SUBMITTED WHEN THERE ARE ITEMS ON THE IDR WHICH ARE |
| | BLANK? JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF THIS IS THE FACT THE |
| | EXTERIOR LIGHTS ON PLANS ARE LEFT BLANK ON THE IDR. |
| | THIS IS NOT THE ONLY ITEM. PLEASE ALSO SEE OTHER ITEMS |
| | FOR OTHER TRADES. |
| | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 13-415.2 |
| | PLEASE BE AWARE IF THE INTERIOR SCOPE OF WORK IS |
| | PERMITTED BEFORE C OF O, THE BASE BUILDING METHOD B |
| | CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REVISED WITH KNOWN |
| | AS THIS IS CURRENTLY BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS ON SHELL |
| | PLANS AND CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE METHOD C* FORM SUBMITTED IS NOT |
| | COMPLETE. THE LIGHTING DENSITIES ARE NOT FILLED OUT AND |
| | ALL INFORMATION IS MISSING. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 FOR INTERIOR |
| | AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING. NOT ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTS AS SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS ARE ON THE SHELL BUILDING PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE |
| | THE OCTAGONAL NOTE #4 DOES NOT APPLY TO BASE PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FORMS SUBMITTED ARE ALSO PHOTO-COPIES, |
| | NOT SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURES AS |
| | REQUIRED PER FBC 13-103.1.1.1 |
| | FAC 61G15-23.002 |
| | FS 481.221/ 471.025 |
| | |
| | ** AS LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT |
| | COMPLETE OR SUBMITTED NO FULL REVIEW FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE COULD BE DONE AT THIS TIME. THERE MAY VERY |
| | WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WHICH |
| | COULD NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #5 AS NOTED THE |
| | COMMENT WAS THAT THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION |
| | NUMBER WAS MISSING. THE PLANS NOW CONTAIN THIS NUMBER |
| | AND IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA |
| | DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION |
| | SITE. THE ADDRESS ON THE SITE DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH |
| | THE PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE THE ADDRESS COORDINATES AS |
| | SHOWN ON THE STATE SITE. IF THERE IS MORE THAN ONE |
| | LOCATION OF BUSINESS, THEN MORE THAN ONE MAY BE LISTED. |
| | FAC 61G15-23.002 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION ON TITLE BLOCKS |
| | FOR ENGINEERING FIRM ETC ON MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND |
| | ELECTRICAL SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 AND |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES 471.023. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING PRINTED NAME, MISSING PRINTED |
| | LICENSE NUMBER AND MISSING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION |
| | NUMBER. |
| | ** THIS IS REQUIRED ON ALL MEP PLANS WHETHER OR NOT |
| | COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER TRADE REVIEWS. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH |
| | RESPECT TO THE NUMBER OF NIGHT LIGHTS LEFT ON. THE |
| | AMOUNT OF LIGHTING AS SHOWN DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF |
| | THE FLORIDA ENERGY CODE AND IS NOT PERMITTED BY THIS |
| | AHJ. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY THE LIGHTING CONTROLS ON PLANS. PLANS |
| | STATE OVER RIDES YET OVER RIDES OF ANY SYSTEM WOULD BE |
| | AUTOMATED NOT A SINGLE POLE SWITCH . EXAMPLE: AN |
| | OCCUPANT COMES INTO WORK WHEN THE NORMAL TIME OF DAY |
| | SCHEDULING IS OFF. THAT PERSON WOULD BE ABLE TO OVER |
| | RIDE THE TIMED SCHEDULING. THE PERSON LEAVES AN HOUR |
| | LATER. IF THE OVER WAS A STANDARD SINGLE POLE SWITCH |
| | THE LIGHTS WOULD REMAIN ON. THERE ARE NOTES ON SYMBOL |
| | LEGEND WHICH SEEMED TO INDICATE THERE ARE TO BE |
| | OCCUPANCY SENSORS HOWEVER SEPARATE SPACES SUCH AT THE |
| | BATHROOMS ONLY SHOW STANDARD SINGLE POLE DEVICES. |
| | ** PLEASE EXPLAIN SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | ** SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #6. |
| | PLEASE KNOW BASED ON NOTE #4 ABOVE. PLEASE KNOW THE |
| | INTENT OF THE ENERGY CODE IS TO CONSERVE ENERGY. PLEASE |
| | SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1 WHICH REQUIRES ALL LIGHTING TO BE |
| | TURNED OFF WHEN NOT IN USE. THIS AHJ DOES NOT HAVE AN |
| | ISSUE WITH PERMITTING *NIGHT LIGHTS* FOR THE REASON OF |
| | LIFE SAFETY OR SECURITY HOWEVER THIS IS TO BE TO A |
| | MINIMUM OF 1FT CANDLE WHICH THE LIFE SAFETY CODE |
| | REQUIRES FOR EGRESS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY |
| | CONDITIONS ON FLAT WALKING SURFACES. (NFPA-101 7.8/7.9 |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTO-METRICS LEVELS FOR EGRESS PATHS |
| | UNDER THE NORMAL AND EMERGENCY CONDITIONS FOR THE NIGHT |
| | LIGHT FIXTURES AE. PLEASE KNOW IF THE LIGHTING LEVELS |
| | ARE OVER, THEN DESIGN WILL BE REQUIRED TO ADJUSTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE BOTH CHAPTER 10 OF THE FBC AND LIFE SAFETY |
| | CODE 7.8.1.2.2ALLOWS THE USE OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS ON |
| | THESE FIXTURES. |
| | THE OTHER ALLOWANCE WOULD BE FOR EACH FIXTURE WHICH IS |
| | 3 LAMPS TO REMAIN ON WITH 1-LAMP OR TWO TO MEET THE 1FT |
| | CANDLE MINIMUM. PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC .1.1, .1.2 AND |
| | .1.3 AS LIGHTING CONTROLS ARE NOT COMPLETE WITH ALL |
| | LIGHTING ON PLANS. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE SEPARATE SPACES WHICH REQUIRES |
| | LIGHTING TO BE ABLE TO OVER RIDE THE LIGHTING CONTROLS, |
| | AND REQUIRES A MAXIMUM OVER RIDE TIME. PLANS INDICATE A |
| | MANUAL OVER RIDE HOWEVER DOES NOT INDICATE THE MAXIMUM |
| | OVER RIDE TIME. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SEPARATE SPACES AS BATHROOMS ETC ONLY |
| | SHOW A STANDARD SWITCH WHICH DOES NOT MEET THESE |
| | SECTIONS OF THE CODE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE REAR OFFICE/WORK ROOM WHICH SHOWS A SR |
| | YET THE SYMBOL LEGEND DOES NOT CONTAIN THIS DEVICE OR |
| | INFORMATION ON WHAT TYPE OF DEVICE IT IS?? PLEASE ALSO |
| | SEE THE OCTAGONAL NOTE #2 WHICH STATES OCCUPANCY SENSOR |
| | YET COULD NOT LOCATE ANY MAXIMUM TIMES. |
| | ** PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER IF NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #7 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. MAY |
| | NOT HAVE THE EMERGENCY/EXIT LIGHTS ALL ON ONE CIRCUIT |
| | UNLESS MEETING THE EXCEPTIONS IN THE CODE. THE LIGHTING |
| | IS REQUIRED TO BE CIRCUITED TO THE LOCAL BRANCH |
| | CIRCUIT. THAT IS THE CODE, THE *EXCEPTION* IS IF YOU |
| | MEET THE ITEMS LISTED UNDER 700.12F. BASED ON THE PLANS |
| | AND INFORMATION SUBMITTED, THE LIGHTING DOES *NOT* MEET |
| | THE EXCEPTION AND CIRCUITING NEEDS TO BE REVISED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 700.12F WHICH REQUIRES EMERGENCY AND EXIT |
| | LIGHTS TO BE CONNECTED TO THE LOCAL LIGHTING BRANCH |
| | CIRCUIT. THERE IS EXCEPTIONS FOR MULTIPLE CIRCUITS IN |
| | UNINTERRUPTED AREAS, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE PLANS WHICH |
| | SHOW FIXTURES IN OTHER SPACES STILL ON THE DEDICATED |
| | CIRCUIT WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: SAME COMMENT AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. MAY NOT USE |
| | *LIGHTING* OR *RECEPTACLES* IN GENERAL. THE PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE STILL INDICATES THIS. |
| | THIS WAS REVISED UNDER THE 2005 CODE |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THE PANEL SCHEDULE CIRCUITS SHALL BE |
| | SPECIFIC TO CIRCUITS. FOR EXAMPLE: THE SHOW WINDOW |
| | RECEPTACLES ARE REQUIRED TO BE LABELED AS SUCH. MAY NOT |
| | LABEL ALL AS *GENERAL LIGHTS* OR GENERAL RECEPTACLES*. |
| | PLEASE SEE 408.4, 210.62. |
| | FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #9 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. THE |
| | PLANS STILL DOE NOT CONTAIN ANY LOAD CALCULATIONS |
| | MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SHOW THE LOAD CALCULATIONS BASED ON NEC. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE SHOW WINDOWS FOR EXAMPLE NEED TO SHOW HOW THESE |
| | LOADS WERE FIGURED PER 220.43 |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO SHOW ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125% PER |
| | 215.3, 230.42 ETC |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: ALL TITLE BLOCKS ON ALL SHEETS WHICH CONTAIN |
| | THE TITLE BLOCK FOR THE ARCHITECT SHALL CONTAIN THE |
| | INFORMATION AS REQUIRED PER FAC 61G1-16.004. |
| | ** MISSING PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER* |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS AND FOR ALL TRADES |
| | WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY THOSE OTHER TRADES. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: THIS IS THE SAME NOTE AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED IN |
| | #11. THE PLANS STILL SHOW EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE YET RISER |
| | AND PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THIS EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SEE |
| | POWER PLANS. THERE IS SOMETHING ON PLANS OUTSIDE. WHAT |
| | IS IT? |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW PANELS OUTSIDE. ARE |
| | THESE INSIDE OR OUTSIDE. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH BASE |
| | SHELL DESIGNER. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLAN REVIEW NOTES. MOST OF THE |
| | NOTES ARE THE SAME AS PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE SEE |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT |
| | COMMENTS FOR MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | **IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |