| Date |
Text |
| 2008-08-14 17:05:24 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** DENIED REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE |
| | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLANS STILL SUBMITTED ONLY FOR PLAN REVIEW AND |
| | NOT SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO GO THROUGH THE SUBMITTED |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION WITH |
| | PLANS. |
| | ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW ONE OF THE EXAMPLES GIVEN WAS |
| | THE FACT MANY OF THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHOWN ON PLANS WAS |
| | NOT IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THE RESPONSE FORM THE |
| | DESIGN TEAM IS THAT THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS ARE LOCATED IN |
| | THE EXTERIOR SECTION OF THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THIS |
| | OFFICE/REVIEWER IS AWARE OF WHERE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS |
| | ARE SHOWN IN AN INPUT DATA REPORT. THE COMMENT WAS IN |
| | FACT THE LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR ALL EXTERIOR |
| | LIGHTS DID NOT MATCH WITH THE LIGHTING SHOWN IN THE |
| | INPUT DATA REPORT. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE AS THERE ARE FIXTURES |
| | LISTED AND ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT IN THE INPUT DATA |
| | REPORT FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTS. |
| | ONE EXAMPLE IS THE 94 WATT FIXTURE AS NO FIXTURES IN |
| | THE IDR ARE 94WATTS. |
| | ANOTHER IS THE COUNT OF THE 50WATT FIXTURES AS THE |
| | PLANS SHOW MORE THAN THE 6 WHICH IS INDICATED IN THE |
| | IDR. |
| | ** THIS IS ONLY A COUPLE AS NOTED FOR DESIGN |
| | BENEFIT. |
| | |
| | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3 13-400.A.3 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3 AS NOTED ON |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEWS. ALL STAIRS ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN AT |
| | LEAST 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IS |
| | PERMITTED TO GO DOWN TO 1FT CANDLE UNDER EMERGENCY |
| | CONDITIONS. PLEASE SEE SHEET ULEN WHICH IS A NEW SHEET |
| | PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE THE LEVELS SHOWN UNDER NORMAL |
| | CONDITIONS ARE IN FACT ABOUT 10 TIMES LESS THAN THE |
| | MINIMUM REQUIRED BY THE LIFE SAFETY CODE. |
| | ALL LEVELS MUST MEET MINIMUM. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE EDC STAIRS. THE PLANS INDICATE SOME SORT |
| | OF EMERGENCY LEVEL HOWEVER THE SECTION OF THE PLANS FOR |
| | THE FRONT EDC STAIRS IS NOT READABLE AND ONLY SHOWS |
| | EMERGENCY LEVELS. |
| | ** KEEP NOTE** THE LIGHTING LEVELS OF OTHER AREAS SHALL |
| | NOT BE FIGURED INTO THE EQUATION OF AVERAGE. |
| | |
| | ** THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED A LETTER FROM TARGET |
| | CORPORATE OFFICES THAT THE STORE WILL NOT BE OCCUPIED |
| | UNDER EMERGENCY POWER. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE |
| | LETTER FROM TARGET CORPORATION. |
| | THE LETTER SUBMITTED IS NOT FROM TARGET CORPORATE |
| | OFFICER. |
| | THE LETTER STATES THAT TARGET TEAM SHALL EVACUATE ALL |
| | OCCUPANTS AND THE BUILDING WILL NOT BE *PUBLICLY |
| | OCCUPIED*. |
| | |
| | ** THE LIFE SAFETY CODE DOES NOT ONLY ADDRESS THE |
| | PUBLIC IS ALSO ADDRESSES THE SAFETY OF ALL EMPLOYEES. |
| | THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE FROM TARGET CORPORATE BEING ONE |
| | OF THE CORPORATION ATTORNEYS/OFFICERS AND IT SHALL |
| | STATE ALL OCCUPANTS INCLUDING EMPLOYEES SHALL EVACUATE |
| | OR PLACE BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURES IN EGRESS AREAS |
| | MEETING THE MINIMUM LEVELS UNDER EMERGENCY EGRESS. |
| | |
| | LS 101 7.8, 7.9 |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION WHERE THE RATING |
| | BETWEEN THE EPSS EQUIPMENT AND OTHER NORMAL EQUIPMENT |
| | IS SHOWN. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE 1HR SEPARATION IS |
| | PROVIDED HOWEVER BASED ON PLANS AND COORDINATION OF |
| | SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS THIS COULD NOT BE LOCATED. |
| | NFPA-110 7.2 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENT #18 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | THE RESPONSE PACKAGE CONTAINS SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR TYPE |
| | OF DEVICE WHICH SNAPS ONTOTHE BREAKER. THE RESPONSE |
| | MENTIONS DISCONNECTS WERE ADDED. IF DISCONNECTS WILL BE |
| | USED AND NO PROPOSAL OF SOME SORT OF DEVICE BEING ADDED |
| | TO BREAKER IS GOING TO BE PROPOSED PLEASE REMOVE FROM |
| | PACKAGE AND ANY OTHER PLANS/DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 422.30.31.110.3.90.7. ETC |
| | |
| | |
| | **IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
