| Date |
Text |
| 2008-03-27 08:37:04 | ** DENIED2ND REVIEW** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH SPECIFICALLY |
| | REQUESTED LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER FBC |
| | 13-415.2. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES ALSO NOTED THIS |
| | PROJECT IS UNDER THE 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE IS NOW A NEW FORM 400D-01 SUBMITTED IN |
| | RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENT HOWEVER THIS 400D -01 IS |
| | FROM THE 2001 FBC WHICH IS NO LONGER IN ADOPTION. |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER EVEN STATES THE FORM 400D FROM FBC |
| | CHAPTER 13 WILL BE SUBMITTED. PLEASE VERIFY CODE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ADOPTION OF THE 2004 FBC WAS OCTOBER |
| | 1ST, 2005.HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT FORM D WHICH IS |
| | FROM THE 2001 FBC IS BEING FILLED OUT, SIGNED DATED AND |
| | SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD WHEN THE CODE CHANGED |
| | ALMOST THREE YEARS AGO? |
| | ONE COPY OF THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS ARE BEING |
| | RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.1 ETC. |
| | ** THIS 2004 FBC WAS REVISED THREE TIMES WITH |
| | SUPPLEMENTS SINCE ITS ADOPTION IN OCT 05. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH SPECIFICALLY |
| | REQUESTED TO STATE MINIMUM RELEVANT CODES ON PLANS. |
| | THE RESPONSE WAS THIS WAS DONE IN DIVISION SPECS, |
| | HOWEVER DIVISION SPECS ARE NOT PART OF THE RECORD PLANS |
| | OR DOCUMENTS SIGNED, DATED OR SEAL BY THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL. |
| | AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW PLEASE BE SURE ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS CONTAIN THE RELEVANT CODES. |
| | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS. |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 |
| | 2003 NPFA-101 |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 |
| | 2002 NFPA-99 |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT NOT ALL CODES REFLECTED ON THE |
| | DIVISION SPEC SHEET ARE CURRENT ADOPTED STANDARDS. |
| | PLEASE LIST THE ABOVE ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES WHICH GAVE |
| | SOME EXAMPLES OF OVER CURRENT PROTECTION WHICH IS SHOWN |
| | TOO HIGH FOR THE TRANSFORMERS AS SHOWN ON RISER. PLEASE |
| | SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE OCP FOR TRANSFORMERS FROM GHC TO |
| | TXRL3 WHICH IS A 25KVA UNIT WITH 100AMP OCP AND TGLC |
| | WHICH IS 30KVA UNIT WITH 80A OCP. |
| | PLEASE SEE THESE DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE GHC. |
| | PLEASE SEE 450.3, 240.4, AND 310.16 ETC AND COORDINATE |
| | ALL ON RISER WITH PANELS AND MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | THE ABOVE ARE GIVEN AS EXAMPLES AS DONE ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW AND THIS OFFICE IS NOT LISTING ALL POSSIBLE. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS WITH |
| | RESPECT TO MINIMUM ADA LEVELS FOR DEVICES TO BE STATED |
| | ON PLANS. RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS IS DONE IN DIVISION |
| | SPECS. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS THE RECORD SET OF |
| | PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN THE *MINIMUM* LEVELS |
| | ALONG WITH * MINIMUM* DESIGN. 11-4.28.1,.2,.3(4). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE |
| | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. |
| | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
