| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-23 08:46:19 | REVIEW #: 2ND**PLAN CHACK ONLY** |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS |
| | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN |
| | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. |
| | |
| | 1. AS STATED IN PREVIOUS REVIEW: "PLEASE INDICATE ON |
| | PLANS THE LOCATION OF ANY RATED WALL OR CEILING |
| | ASSEMBLIES AS WELL AS THE OPENING PROTECTIVE METHODS |
| | DEPLOYED..." |
| | WHILE DAMPER LOCATIONS ARE NOW SHOWN ON PLANS, THE |
| | LOCATION OF EXISTING RATED ASSEMBLIES WAS NOT PROVIDED |
| | AS REQUESTED IN PREVIOUS REVIEW. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE |
| | DURING THIS REVIEW TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF RATED |
| | ASSEMBLIES BASED ON THE LOCATION OF DAMPERS NOW SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS BUT THIS WAS NOT POSSIBLE. WHEN LOOKING FOR |
| | THE LOGICAL CONTINUATION OF WALLS SHOWN AS RATED BASED |
| | ON THE LOCATION OF DAMPERS, IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY |
| | BE ADDITIONAL DUCT PENETRATIONS OF RATED WALLS WHICH |
| | ARE NOT PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDED THE INFORMATION NEEDED AND REQUESTED TO |
| | FACILITATE A COMPLETE REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. FBCB |
| | 106.1.1 AND FBCB 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 2 THROUGH 6: OK |
| | |
| | 7. ACKNOWLEDGED. IF THIS ISSUE IS NOT RESOLVED AND |
| | BECOMES THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE, IT CAN BE COVERED WITH A PROVISO TO ALLOW THE |
| | PROJECT TO PROCEED WHILE THE MANUFACTURER PREPARES |
| | THEIR DOCUMENTATION. |
| | |
| | 8. OK |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | RONALD J. REGUEIRO |
| | 561.805.6719 |
| | [email protected] |
