| Date |
Text |
| 2008-09-09 13:44:12 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 08010249 |
| | ADD: 295 LAKEVIEW AVE. |
| | CONT: KAST CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (561)718-6141 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | ARCH: PFVS/ GREGORY R PORTMAN |
| | TEL: (404)503- 5000 |
| | |
| | STRUC: OMNJ/ THOMAS M BOGACKI |
| | TEL: (561)835-9994 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | SUBMITTAL REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | SHOP DRAWING: STEEL RACKS @ ROOF |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON WHAT THIS |
| | SUBMITTAL IS TO BE USED FOR, IT APPEARS TO BE A |
| | SCREENING ENCLOSURE TO HIDE THE RTU ON THE TOP OF THE |
| | ROOF. IN DOING SO THIS WILL NEED TO UPDATE |
| | SHEETS A-105-A AND A105-B AS TO THIS WOULD BE A |
| | REVISION TO BE REVIEWED BY ZONING AND BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SECOND ISSUE IS THIS DETAIL INDICATES CHAIN-LINK |
| | BRACKETS BY OTHERS, BUT AGAIN IF FENCING IS TO BE |
| | APPLIED AS A SCREENING TYPE MATERIAL, IT WOULD ALSO |
| | NEED THE BLINDS INSERTED INTO EACH ROW CREATING A |
| | NON-VIEWABLE FENCING THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW WIND TO |
| | TRAVEL THROUGH, AND THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD THIS REVISION SINCE THE STRUCTURAL |
| | PLANS S106-A & S-106B ONLY INDICATE EMBEDS IN THE ROOF |
| | SLAB AND THE ACTUAL RTU STANDS WILL BE SUPPLIED LATTER |
| | AND REVIEWED AT THAT TIME. |
| | |
| | 3) THE SHOP DRAWING STAMP IS NOT EVEN ON THIS DOCUMENT |
| | BUT A COPY ATTACHED TO ANOTHER PAGE. FL 61G-15-30.006 |
| | (3) THE DELEGATED ENGINEER SHALL FORWARD THE DELEGATED |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4) SINCE THIS IS DOES NOT SHOW UP ON ANY |
| | ARCHITECTURALNOR STRUCTURAL SHEETS WHAT ARE THE WIND |
| | CRITERIA THIS AREA IS DESIGNED TOO? |
| | 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN DATA. |
| | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL |
| | BE SHOWN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER WIND LOADS GOVERN THE |
| | DESIGN OF THE LATERAL-FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM OF THE |
| | BUILDING: |
| | 1. BASIC WIND SPEED (3-SECOND GUST), MILES PER HOUR |
| | (KM/HR). |
| | |
| | 2. WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, I W , AND BUILDING |
| | CLASSIFICATION FROM TABLE 1604.5 OR TABLE 6-1, ASCE 7 |
| | AND BUILDING CLASSIFICATION IN TABLE 1-1, ASCE 7. |
| | |
| | 3. WIND EXPOSURE, IF MORE THAN ONE WIND EXPOSURE IS |
| | UTILIZED, THE WIND EXPOSURE AND APPLICABLE WIND |
| | DIRECTION SHALL BE INDICATED. |
| | |
| | 4. THE APPLICABLE ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATIONS AND, IF |
| | DESIGNING WITH ASCE 7, INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT. |
| | 5. COMPONENTS AND CLADDING. THE DESIGN WIND PRESSURES |
| | IN TERMS OF PSF (KN/M 2 ) TO BE USED FOR THE SELECTION |
| | OF EXTERIOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING MATERIALS NOT |
| | SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL. |
| | |
| | 5) IN REVIEWING THIS DOCUMENT WITH THE MECHANICAL PLAN |
| | REVIEWER, IT WOULD APPEAR THIS STRUCTURE WOULD BE MORE |
| | THAN A MERE FENCE ENCLOSURE THAT IS TO HIDE THE RTU |
| | UNITS, BUT IN ACTUALLITY THIS MAY BE A STRUCTURE TO |
| | HOLD THE ACTUAL CLADDING OR PORTIONS OF CLADDING OF THE |
| | ROOF TOP UNITS THAT MAY BLOW OF IN A HIGH WIND EVENT. |
| | JUNE 27/08 MECHANICAL PROVISO # 1 INDICATED THE NEED TO |
| | ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH 301.13 FBCM AND ALTERNATE |
| | MEANS AND METHODS MAY BE ONE VEHICLE TO BE USED IF |
| | ENGINEERING OF THESE UNITS WAS NOT SUBMITTED AND |
| | REVIEWED AS CODE COMPLIANT. IN DOING SO ANY DOCUMENTS |
| | TO BE SUBMITTED AS ALTERNATE MEANS AND METHODS WILL |
| | NEED TO BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH CALCULATIONS AND |
| | TO BE REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICAL. THE SAME ISSUES |
| | WILL OCCUR IF THIS STRUCTURE IS TO RESTRICT PORTIONS OF |
| | THE RTU CLADDING WIND WILL NOT BE ABLE TO TRAVEL |
| | THRUOGH, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS INDICATING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH 301.13 FBCM. |
| | |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
