| Date |
Text |
| 2008-02-25 12:23:54 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 08010249 |
| | ADD: 295 LAKEVIEW AVE. |
| | CONT: KAST CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (561)718-6141 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1B) INFORMATIONAL. PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, |
| | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR |
| | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL |
| | REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A |
| | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN |
| | (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS |
| | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 1C)INFORMATIONAL.106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN |
| | INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO |
| | THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO |
| | CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION |
| | SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE |
| | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR |
| | ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND |
| | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS |
| | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 1D) INFORMATIONAL. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST |
| | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO |
| | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2) W P B ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 108.2 SCHEDULE OF PERMIT |
| | FEES. ON BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ELECTRICAL, GAS, |
| | MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS OR ALTERATIONS |
| | REQUIRING A PERMIT, A FEE FOR EACH PERMIT SHALL BE PAID |
| | AS REQUIRED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE |
| | ESTABLISHED BY THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY. |
| | |
| | 108.3*BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. |
| | IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE |
| | CLAIMED VALUATION OF BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, |
| | ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS |
| | APPEARS TO BE UNDER ESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE |
| | PERMIT SHALL BE DENIED.FOR PERMITTINGPURPOSES, |
| | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL |
| | REPLACEMENT PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND |
| | SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE |
| | STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR |
| | FINISHES, NORMAL SITE WORK (EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR |
| | BUILDINGS), ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING |
| | COST, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. |
| | VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED |
| | DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| | (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC) WITH REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS |
| | FOR LOCATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| | CONGRESS. |
| | |
| | ICC TOTAL VALUATION FOR PROJECT IS $18,616,066.00 |
| | |
| | MINUS VIBRO-FLOTATION& STRUCTURAL-3,941,840.00 |
| | VALUATION FOR THIS PERMIT $ |
| | 14,674,226.00 |
| | |
| | FEES DUE THIS PERMIT |
| | $163,439.36 |
| | PAID TO DATE |
| | $45,493.17 |
| | FEE BALANCE |
| | $117,946.19 |
| | SEE FEE BALANCE SHEET ATTACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A-101A: |
| | 3A) WHEN THE CONFERENCE ROOMS 110, 111 & 117 ARE OPENED |
| | INTO ONE LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM THE OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD |
| | BE 68 REQUIRING 2 EXITS. WHEN AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY IS |
| | OVER 30 OCCUPANTS THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE FIRE RATED 1 HOUR EVEN WITH FIRE |
| | SPRINKLERS PLEASE SEE TABLE 1016.1. |
| | |
| | 3B) THE OTHER CONCERN IS WITH THE RATING OF THE |
| | CORRIDOR, PLEASE REVIEW 1016.5 CONTINUITY OF CORRIDORS |
| | AND THE FIRE RATING INTO THE LOBBY AND RECEPTION AREAS. |
| | THIS WILL ALSO EFFECT THE DOOR RATINGS IN TABLE 715.3, |
| | PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 3C) THE FIRST FLOORDOORS CAN NOT BE CHECKED IN THE |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A-611, THE NUMBERING SEQUENCE IS SO |
| | FAR OVER INTO THE LEFT MARGIN OF THE SHEET THAT THE |
| | NUMBERING SEQUENCE COLUMN IS BOUND BY THE STAPLES, |
| | PLEASE REPRINT THIS SHEET AND ALLOW FOR BINDING OF |
| | PLANS TOGETHER. 106.1.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE |
| | THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF WORK PROPOSED AND |
| | SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT CONFORMS TO THE PROVISIONS OF |
| | THIS CODE. |
| | |
| | 3D) THE EXTERIOR NORTH WALL OF THE BUILDING INDICATES |
| | WALL TAGS OF 1 HOUR RATING, PLEASE REVIEW TABLE 602 , < |
| | 5?-0? REQUIRES A 3 HR RATED WALL FOR THESE |
| | OCCUPANCIES: |
| | ASSEMBLY, BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE. PLEASE CORRECT PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3E) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, 106.1.2. OCCUPANCY |
| | SEPARATION, WALL TAGS ARE MISSING ON THE COMMON PARKING |
| | GARAGE AND THE OTHER OCCUPANCIES, PLEASE SEE |
| | TABLE302.3.2. |
| | |
| | 3F) PLEASE REVIEW THE ELEVATOR WALLS FOR WALL |
| | IDENTIFICATION TAGS INDICATING THE RATING FOR SHAFTS, |
| | SEE 707.4. |
| | |
| | 3G) THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR 131 APPEARS TO BE A PASSENGER |
| | LOADING ZONE WITH A VALET SERVICE AND LUGGAGE AREA. THE |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE A DROPPED CURB NOR A PASSENGER |
| | LOADING ZONE. |
| | 11-4.1.2(5)?. ALSO SEE 11-4.2.9.5 DETECTABLE WARNING |
| | DEVISES. |
| | |
| | 3H) THE DISABLED PARKING SPACE, WEST END OF, INDICATES |
| | A RAMP NO INFORMATION ON HEIGHT OF RAMP, CHANGE IN |
| | GRADE SEE 11-4.8(1-6). |
| | |
| | 3I) RESTROOMS 112 & 113 ARE INDICATED AS DETAIL# 2 |
| | SHEET A-403, PLEASE CORRECT TO A-402. |
| | |
| | 3J) RESTROOMS 112 & 113 PLEASE PROVIDE IN DETAIL THE |
| | CLEAR WIDTH OF THE ACCESSIBLE STALL DOOR, PLEASE SEE |
| | FIGURE 30E. |
| | |
| | 3K) 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, WHAT IS |
| | THE PURPOSE OF THE E-ROOM? |
| | |
| | 3L) PLEASE PROVIDE STAIR IDENTIFICATION 1009.5.3 |
| | |
| | 3M) PLEASE REVIEW STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF BUILDINGS IN |
| | BUILDINGS 4 STORIES AND MORE, 1009.12.. |
| | |
| | 3N) THERE APPEARS TO BE A RAMP IN FRONT OF DOOR# 114, |
| | THIS RAMP DOES NOT PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE |
| | INFORMATION, HANDRAILS OR BOTTOM LANDING INFORMATION, |
| | PLEASE SEE 11-4.8. |
| | |
| | 3O)THIS PLAN INDICATES THE USE OF AN EMERGENCY |
| | GENERATOR PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE |
| | GENERATOR AND FUEL SUPPLY TANK. QUANTITY OF FUEL THAT |
| | IS TO BE STORED ON SITE AND TYPE OF VAULT. DOES THIS |
| | FUEL TANK HAVESECONDARY CONTAINMENT? |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET A-101B |
| | 4A) THE NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINE WALLS HAVE WALL |
| | IDENTIFICATION TAGS 1-B, PLEASE SEE |
| | TABLE 602 FOR WALLS LOCATED LESS THAN 5?-0? FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. TABLE 602 INDICATES |
| | A 3HOUR WALL. |
| | |
| | 4B) PLEASE LOOK AT THE DOOR # 149 IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE, |
| | SCHEDULE INDICATES NO FIRE RATING, |
| | 1016.1 ANDTABLE 302.3.2 OCCUPANCY SEPARATION, OPENING |
| | PROTECTIVE TABLE 715.3 . |
| | |
| | 4C) RAMP FROM DOOR# 149 TO THE EXTERIOR, THE PLANS ARE |
| | MISSING THE TOP TURNING RADIUS. |
| | PLEASE SEE 11-4.8.4(3). |
| | |
| | 4D) RAMP FROM DOOR # 149 IS MISSING THE HANDRAILS |
| | REQUIRED BOTH SIDES11-4.8.5. |
| | |
| | 4E) RAMP BY DOOR 149 DOES NOT INDICATE THE BOTTOM |
| | LANDING, 11-4.8.4(2). |
| | |
| | 4F) RAMP BY DOOR# 149 PLEASE PROVIDE THE CLEAR |
| | DIMENSION AT THE BOTTOM OF THE RAMP FROM COLUMN TO |
| | COLUMN. 11-4.8.3 WHEN PART OF A MEANS OF EGRESS MINIMUM |
| | OF44? CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 4G) RAMP BY DOOR# 149 INDICATES A SLOPE OF 8% PLEASE |
| | SEE 11-4.8.2 THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF A RAMP IN NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE 1 TO 12. |
| | |
| | 4H)EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING ROOM 103 THE EMERGENCY |
| | GENERATOR ROOM INDICATES OPENINGS IN THE WALL, PLEASE |
| | SEE TABLE 602 LESS THAN FIVE FOOT FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE, NO OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 4I) COMPACTOR DETAIL FOUND ON SHEET AC-102 DETAIL 9 |
| | INDICATES THE USE OF A SCISSOR LIFT, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 4J) PLEASE PROVIDE STAIR IDENTIFICATION 1009.5.3 |
| | |
| | 4K) PLEASE REVIEW STAIR ACCESS TO ROOF BUILDINGS IN |
| | BUILDINGS 4 STORIES AND MORE, 1009.12.. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5)SHEET A-102A |
| | 5A) PLEASE PROVIDE AREA CALCULATIONS HOW THIS LEVEL |
| | CLASSIFIES AS A MEZZANINE?505.2 AREA LIMITATION.THE |
| | AGGREGATE AREA OF A MEZZANINE OR MEZZANINES WITHIN A |
| | ROOM SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE AREA OF THAT |
| | ROOM OR SPACE IN WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED. |
| | |
| | 5B)DOORS ON THE A-102A & A-102B FLOOR PLANS DO NOT |
| | SHOW UP ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE |
| | SHEET A-611, PLEASE CORRECT, THIS SHEET CAN NOT BE |
| | CHECKED FOR OPENING PROTECTIVES |
| | TABLE 715.3. |
| | |
| | 5C) THIS COMMENT WILL NOT BE REPEATED FOR EVERY CASE |
| | BOTH SHEET A-102A AND A-102B THE NORTH AND EAST |
| | PROPERTY LINES ARE LESS THAN 5?-0? FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE REQUIRING 3 HR FIRE RATING. SEE TABLE 602. |
| | |
| | 5D) THERE IS A ROOM NOT IDENTIFIED, DOOR 155A LEADS |
| | INTO THIS AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 5E) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. ON SHEET |
| | A-101A THERE ARE ROOMS 118-123 |
| | THE NEXT LEVEL UP (SHEET A-102A) THE PLAN INDICATES |
| | CEILING BELOW BUT THERE IS NO CUT SECTIONS OF THIS AREA |
| | INDICATING HEIGHT OF THE CEILING OR MATERIAL. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE HEIGHT OF THE CEILING AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS |
| | OF THIS SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 6) A-102B |
| | 6A) THE ROOMS BELOW (105-108) ARE INDICATED AS CEILING |
| | BELOW, PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION THROUGH INDICATING |
| | TYPE OF CEILING, HEIGHT OF CEILING AND TYPE OF |
| | STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 6B) IN THE SAME ROOMS MENTIONED ABOVE THE PLANS APPEAR |
| | TO HAVE (3) CHASES IN THE CENTER OF THIS AREA? PROVIDE |
| | MORE DETAILS AND FIRE RATINGS. 106.1.2. ? 712.4. |
| | |
| | 6C) THERE IS A CONCRETE WALL ON GRID LINE B.4 BETWEEN |
| | COLUMN LINE 2-3. THIS SHOULD BE A GUARD RAIL AS WELL AS |
| | VEHICLE BARRIER, PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | 1607.7.3 |
| | |
| | 6D) THE OTHER AREA OF CONCERNS WITH GUARDS WOULD BE THE |
| | DROP OFF EDGE WHERE THE RAMP RISES AND OR FALLS TO THE |
| | NEXT LEVEL. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 1607.7.3. |
| | |
| | 6E) THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE GARAGE THERE APPEARS TO |
| | BE A SHAFT BUT NO WALL TAGS. |
| | 707.4. |
| | |
| | 6F) CORRIDOR M114 IS INDICATED AS A 1 HR RATED WALL |
| | WITH NO DOORS SEPARATING THE GARAGE FROM THE CORRIDOR. |
| | 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET A-103A: |
| | 7A) EXIT WAY# 230 IS INDICATED AS NON RATED WALLS, THE |
| | MECHANICAL SHEETS INDICATE FIRE DAMPERS, SEE TABLE |
| | 1016.1 FOR FIRE RATINGS. |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET A-103A |
| | 8A) ELEVATOR LOBBY 240, THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR ALL |
| | FLOORS WITH R1 TYPE OCCUPANCY. |
| | PLEASE SEE REQUIRED 1 HOUR RATING & OPENING PROTECTION, |
| | 707.14.1, TABLE 1016.1 AND THE CODE COMMENTARY FOR |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR A 1 HR FIRE RATING, THIS COMMENT WILL |
| | STAND FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| | |
| | 8B)STAIR TOWER# 2 INDICATES TWO METAL STUD WALLS IN |
| | THE INTERIOR OF THE STAIR TOWER ONE SEPARATES THE |
| | STAIRS FROM THE ELECTRIC ROOM PLEASE IDENTIFY WALL TYPE |
| | AND HOURLY RATING, 707.4 THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR |
| | THE COMMON FLOORS. |
| | |
| | 8C) STAIR TOWER# 2 INDICATES TWO METAL STUD WALLS IN |
| | THE INTERIOR OF THE STAIR TOWER ONE SEPARATES THE |
| | STAIRS FROM WHAT APPEARS TO BE A SHAFT WITHIN THE STAIR |
| | TOWER, PLEASE IDENTIFY WALL TYPE AND HOURLY RATING, |
| | 707.4. THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| | |
| | 8D) LAUNDRY ROOM 235 DOES NOT HAVE A TERMINATION ROOM |
| | AS REQUIRED IN 707.13.4.THE TERMINATION ROOM SHALL |
| | HAVE OPENING PROTECTION NOT LESS THAN ? HOURS AND BE |
| | SELF-CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC-CLOSING UPON THE DETECTION OF |
| | SMOKE. |
| | |
| | 8E) LAUNDRY ROOM ITSELF WOULD NORMALLY ONLY REQUIRE THE |
| | WALLS TO BE SMOKE RATED, AS THE WALLS THAT ARE SHARED |
| | BY THE TRAINING AND HOUSE KEEPING ROOMS, PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT NON OF THE NON-RATED WALL TYPES ARE SPECIFIED AS |
| | SMOKE PARTITIONS SEE SECTION 710. IN THIS CASE THE |
| | LAUNDRY ROOM WALLS THAT ARE COMMON TO THE EXIT ACCESS |
| | CORRIDOR WILL NEED TO BE 1 HR FIRE RATING BECAUSE OF |
| | THE R1 OCCUPANCY, TABLE 1016.1. |
| | |
| | 8F) DOOR 230A IS STILL PART OF THE 1 HR RATED EXIT |
| | ACCESS CORRIDOR THAT LEADS TO THE VERTICAL EXIT |
| | STAIRWELL, THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES THIS DOOR NOT |
| | RATED, PLEASE CORRECT, TABLE 1016.1/ TABLE 715.3 |
| | OPENING PROTECTIVE. |
| | |
| | 8G) DOOR 230A APPEARS TO BE MISSING THE REQUIRED 18? ON |
| | THE PULL, LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. |
| | 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM |
| | MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC |
| | OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN FIG. 25. THE |
| | FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES |
| | SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| | |
| | 8H) LAUNDRY ROOM PLAN IS MISSING THE THROUGH |
| | PENETRATIONS (2-LOUVERS) IN THE RATED WALL |
| | COMMON WITH THE GARAGE. OPENING PROTECTION IS REQUIRED, |
| | SEE TABLE 715.3. |
| | |
| | 8I) BETWEEN UNITS THERE ARE QUITE A FEW WALLS THAT DO |
| | NOT HAVE WALL IDENTIFICATION TAGS, |
| | SEE 1207.2. THIS COMMENT WILL STAND FOR ALL |
| | SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 9) SHEET A-103B: |
| | 9A) DOOR# 237APPEARS TO BE MISSING THE REQUIRED 18? |
| | ON THE PULL, LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. |
| | 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM |
| | MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC |
| | OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN FIG. 25. THE |
| | FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES |
| | SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| | |
| | 9B) LAUNDRY ROOM 238 INDICATES ON THE MECHANICAL SHEETS |
| | DRYER EXHAUST PENETRATINGA 1HR FIRE RATED WALL |
| | INDICATE OPENING PROTECTION, TABLE 715.3. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 10) A-104A COMMON TO THE 3RD, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS. |
| | 10A) ROOM# 450 VENDING / ICEAND ROOM 451LINEN ROOM |
| | THIS COMMON WALL IS PART OF THE |
| | 1 HR RATED CORRIDOR IS MISSING WALL TAG, TABLE 715.3. |
| | |
| | 10B) THE LAUNDRY ROOM DOOR IS ALSO THE LAUNDRY CHUTE |
| | ACCESS DOOR REQUIRING A ? HR OPENING PROTECTIVE AND BE |
| | SELF-CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC-CLOSING UPON THE DETECTION OF |
| | SMOKE. |
| | IS FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. NOT 20 MINUTE AS INDICATED IN |
| | THE DOOR SCHEDULE, PLEASE CORRECT& SEE 707.13.4. THIS |
| | COMMENT IS FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| | |
| | 10C)THE LAUNDRY ROOM ACCESS ROOM ALSO IS MISSING THE |
| | WALL RATINGS OF BOTH SHAFT ENCLOSURES IN THIS ROOM. |
| | 707.4. SHAFTS. THIS COMMENT IS FOR ALL COMMON FLOORS. |
| | |
| | 10D)BETWEEN UNITS 433 & 436 AT THE SHOWER LOCATIONS |
| | THE PLANS INDICATE A WALL TAG |
| | ?OC? NON-RATED WALL. 708.1(2) , 708.3 & 708.4. |
| | |
| | 10E) THE UNIDENTIFIED ROOM JUST LEFT OF STAIR TOWER# 2 |
| | HAS A 25X45 MECHANICAL CHASE, THE SHAFT WALLS ARE NOT |
| | IDENTIFIED WITH WALL TAGS. SEE 707.4. |
| | |
| | 10F) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE USAGE OF ROOM LISTED ABOVE. |
| | 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 11) SHEET A-104B COMMON TO 3RD, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS. |
| | 11A) THIS SHEET THERE ARE NO WALL TAGS IDENTIFYING WALL |
| | RATINGS. TABLE 1016.1, 708.1(2), 708.3 & 708.4. |
| | |
| | 11B) STAIR TOWER# 1 INDICATES A SHAFT LOCATED WITHIN |
| | THE STAIR TOWER, SEE 707.4 & 1019.1.2. |
| | |
| | 11C) PLANS INDICATE A CHASE OR SHAFT IN THE ELECTRIC |
| | ROOM 402, PLEASE SEE 707.4. |
| | |
| | 11D)THE EAST ELECTRICAL ROOM AND STORAGE ROOM DOORS |
| | AND HALLWAY DOOR DO NOT HAVE IDENTIFICATION TAGS, FIRE |
| | RATINGS? THIS IS A 1HR FIRE RATED CORRIDOR. TABLE |
| | 1016.1. THE CORRIDOR WIDTH IN THE UPPER DETAIL IS NOT |
| | PROVIDED?CONSIDER DOOR WIDTH VERSES CORRIDOR WIDTH. |
| | 1005.2DOOR ENCROACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 12) SHEET A-105A: |
| | 12A) NO ROOF ACCESS SEE COMMENT (3M) FOR STAIR ACCESS |
| | TO ROOF. 1009.12. |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET A-105B: |
| | |
| | 13A) THE STAIRWELL# 2 IS NOT DEPICTED AS GOING THROUGH |
| | TO THE ROOF LEVEL,SEE 1009.12. |
| | |
| | |
| | 13B) THERE IS NO ROOF PLAN OF STAIR# 2 INDICATING THAT |
| | DOES GO TO THE ROOF AND DOOR TO THE |
| | ROOF LEVEL, THE DOOR SCHEDULE ALSO WILL NEED TO REFLECT |
| | THIS DOOR AND FIRE RATING, 106.1.2, |
| | & TABLE 715.3 OPENINGPROTECTION. |
| | |
| | 14) SHEET A-202, A-203 & A-204 ALL FAIL TO INDICATE THE |
| | STAIRWELL# 2 CONTINUING THROUGH TO THE ROOF LEVEL. |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, 106.1.2 & 1009.12. |
| | |
| | 15) SHEET A-307 DETAIL# 2 ON THE MEZZANINE AND 2ND |
| | FLOOR LEVELS INDICATE WHAT APPEARS TO BE CONCRETE KNEE |
| | WALLS WHERE IS THIS CUT SECTION TAKEN, SHEETS A-102A, |
| | A-102B, A-103A |
| | & A103B ALL INDICATE A 1HOUR RATED BLOCK WALL? |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 16)SHEET A-402 BUFFET PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | 11-5.2, 11-5.4&11.5.5. |
| | |
| | 17)SHEET A-428 INDICATES THE USE OF A FIRE SHUTTER AT |
| | THE ELEVATOR LOBBYPLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE |
| | RATING OF FIRE SHUTTER AND COMPLIANCE WITH 715.3.9. |
| | |
| | 18) SHEET A-429, A-430 &A-431 BOTH FAIL TO INDICATE |
| | OPENING PROTECTION AT THE ELEVATOR LOBBY.PLEASE SEE |
| | 707.14.1. |
| | |
| | 19) SHEET AR 401 DETAIL 3 INDICATES THE USE OF ACRYLIC |
| | PANELS PLEASE PROVIDE THE AREA WHERE THIS CEILING WILL |
| | TAKE PLACE AND HOW IT WILL BE HUNG? PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | SMOKE DEVELOPMENT AND FLAME SPREAD FOR THIS PRODUCT IN |
| | THIS APPLICATION. TABLE 803.5 & 803.1. |
| | |
| | 20)PROVISO: EXTERIOR LIGHT GAUGE METAL FRAMING TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED AS SHOP DRAWINGS AFTER BEING REVIEWED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD REVIEW AND APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 21)A-511 FIN WALL DETAIL# 9 INDICATES THAT THE |
| | FINWALL FRAME IS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE PER |
| | NOA REQUIREMENTS,THERE IS NO FIN WALL LISTED UNDER |
| | EITHER MIAMI-DADE OR |
| | THE FLORIDA STATE WEB SITE.THE PRODUCT TESTING REPORT |
| | WILL NEED TO HAVE THIS TYPE WINDOW APPLICATION TESTED |
| | AND SHOW THE REQUIRED ANCHORAGE. |
| | 1714.5.4.1. WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE |
| | ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLISHED |
| | MANUFACTURER?S RECOMMENDATIONS TO ACHIEVE THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE SPECIFIED. SUBSTITUTE ANCHORING SYSTEMS USED |
| | FOR SUBSTRATES NOT SPECIFIED BY THE FENESTRATION |
| | MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE EQUAL OR GREATER ANCHORING |
| | PERFORMANCE AS DEMONSTRATED BY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING |
| | PRACTICE. |
| | |
| | 22)1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE |
| | DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE |
| | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS |
| | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF |
| | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES |
| | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH |
| | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 ANDASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE |
| | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. |
| | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE |
| | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. |
| | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 |
| | M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL |
| | MISSILE TEST. |
| | |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, |
| | PROVIDE 2 COPIES, |
| | 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| | REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | 22A) STOREFRONT UNITS- OK COMPLIED |
| | 22B) FIXED WINDOWS- TRACO WINDOWS DID NOT MEET THE -89 |
| | IN END ZONES |
| | 22B) HORIZONTAL SLIDING UNITS TRACO- CIRCLE GLAZING |
| | TYPE FOR PRESSUES |
| | 22C) FINWALL WINDOW SYSTEMS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED |
| | 22D) MULLIONS- PGT MULLIONS CIRCLE MULLION LENGTHS TO |
| | BE USED/ FOR PRESSURES |
| | 22E) WALL LOUVERS- OK REVIEWED |
| | 22F)EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS, SINGLE & PAIR OF |
| | DOORS |
| | 22G) EXTERIOR AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS- OK REVIEWED |
| | 22H) EXTERIOR GLAZED SWING DOORS- OK COMPLIED |
| | 22I)PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS- NO REPORT SUBMITTED |
| | 22J) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES- CARLISLE REPORT, REQUIRES |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS AND AN APPROVED ROOFING |
| | CONTRACTOR TO BE SIGNED ON. |
| | |
| | 23) FOR FLAT ROOF THESE ARE THE MOST COMMON MISTAKES IN |
| | SUBMITTING ROOFING REPORTS |
| | _XX__ THE SUB-SYSTEM PROVIDED IN THE REPORT IS NOT |
| | HIGHLIGHTED. |
| | __XX__ THE SUB-SYSTEM PICKEDHAS A LOWPRESSURE FOR |
| | ZONE _2&3__ . |
| | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD |
| | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THATREQUIRED, AS |
| | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER |
| | SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA |
| | REGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOFCONSULTANT MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO |
| | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 24)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 25) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 26) S-207 EAST ELEVATION PRESSURES ARE NOT PROVIDED FOR |
| | WALL LOUVER AT EAST LOWER LEFT |
| | ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | 27) NOTE: AWNINGS REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. WILL NOT |
| | BE PART OF THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 28)SHEET A-711/ ELEVATORS: |
| | 28A)BUILDINGS 4 STORIES IN HEIGHT, AT LEAST ONE |
| | ELEVATOR SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| | EMERGENCY ACCESS TO ALL FLOORS. SUCH ELEVATOR CARS |
| | SHALL BE OF SUCH SIZE AND ARRANGEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE A |
| | 24-INCH BY 76-INCH AMBULANCE STRETCHER IN THE |
| | HORIZONTAL, OPEN POSITION AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY |
| | THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES |
| | (STAR OF LIFE). |
| | |
| | 28B)THERE IS NO FIRE ALARM PLANS AND THE ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE USE OF SMOKE DETECTORS IN |
| | EACH LEVEL OF THE ELEVATOR LOBBIES NOR IN THE MACHINE |
| | ROOM. PLEASE SEE 3002.8. |
| | ALSO SEE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR IF HOIST-WAY IS OR IS NOT |
| | FIRESPRINKLED. |
| | |
| | 28C)PLEASE SEE REQUIREMENTS FOR ELEVATOR VENTING FOR |
| | R! OCCUPANCIES 3 STORIES AND GREATER.3004.2 LOCATION |
| | OF VENTS |
| | 3004.3 AREA OF VENTS |
| | |
| | 29) SHEET A-513: |
| | 29A) PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE THE USE OF FIRE SPRINKLERS |
| | AS REQUIRED IN 707.13.6 & 903.2.10.2. |
| | |
| | 29B) PLANS INDICATE 2 SHAFTS IN THIS PLAN BOTH |
| | INDICATING THEY ARE 2 HR CONSTRUCTION, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | AN ASSEMBLY NUMBER FORTHESE SHAFTS. 707.4. |
| | |
| | 30) FP-205: |
| | 30A) FP-205A IS THE FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN FOR THE ROOF |
| | LEVEL WEST PORTION OF THE BUILDING, NO INFORMATION IF |
| | FIRE SPRINKLERS WILL BE IN THE ELEVATOR SHAFT. |
| | |
| | 30B) FP-205B THIS SHEET IS MISSING TOTALLY, STAIRWELL |
| | AND STANDPIPE THAT PROVIDES ROOF ACCESS. |
| | |
| | 31) PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS BETWEEN A-101A AND FP-201 A |
| | DOOR 114 ON THE FP SWINGS AGAINST THE EGRESS FLOW, SEE |
| | 1008.1.2. |
| | |
| | 32) PLEASE PROVIDE FIRE ALARM INFORMATION 907.2.10.1.1. |
| | / 106.3.5.1.1(5) & (6) EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS. WILL ALSO |
| | REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT AND REVIEW NOT UNDER THIS |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |