Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 07120513
Permit Number 07120513
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2008-04-18 10:31:20** DENIED3RD REVIEW**
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS FOR THE MTS. THE SUBMITTALS FOR THE QUICK
 CONNECT CABINET ARE FOR THE OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT ONLY.
 110.7, 702.6, 90.7
 PLEASE SUBMIT.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT INFORMATION ON THE MDP1 FOR
 COMPLIANCE WITH 230.76 AND 230.79.
 THIS WAS NOT A PREVIOUS COMMENT HOWEVER AS THE RISER
 INDICATES A *SHUNT TRIP* ONLY AND NEITHER THE RISER OR
 THE MDP1 SCHEDULE INDICATES AN ACTUAL MAIN CIRCUIT
 BREAKER THERE IS A CONCERN THAT THIS BREAKER MAY BE A
 SHUNT TIP ONLY BREAKER. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION
 ON RISER/SCHEDULE SHEET OR PROVIDE ACTUAL SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS WHICH SHOW THE MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER WITH A
 MANUAL HANDLE ETC.
 ** SHUNT TIP ONLY BREAKERS WITHOUT MANUAL MEANS OF
 DISCONNECT ON OUTSIDE OF EQUIPMENT ARE NOT PERMITTED BY
 CODE AND SECTIONS ARE GIVEN ABOVE.
 110.3, 90.7.
  
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RTU-3 IS SHOWING A 90AMP
 BREAKER WHEN THE RISER SHOWS A 125AMP BREAKER FEEDING
 THIS UNIT. THE SHEET M0.2 SHOWS MAXIMUM OCP AS 90AMP.
 THIS COULD BE REDLINED *IF* NO OTHER CHANGES WERE NEED
 HOWEVER DUE TO COMMENT NUMBER TWO ABOVE THIS MAY BE
 CORRECTED AT THE SAME TIME.
 FBC 106.1.2ADMIN SECTION FOR COORDINATION.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
 THE BELOW ARE SOME EXAMPLES HOWEVER IS NOT AN EXHAUSTED
 LIST. PLEASE BE SURE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS IS PLACED
 INTO THE INPUT DATA REPORT.
 ** PLEASE KNOW THE WATTAGE FIGURED INTO THE INPUT DATA
 REPORT (IDR) SHALL BE BASED ON THE FIXTURE AVAILABLE
 WATTAGE OR OUTPUT AND NOT THE WATTAGE OF THE BULB(S)
 INSTALLED.
 ** PLEASE SEE THE JURISDICTION ALSO NEEDS TO BE UPDATED
 AS THIS IS SHOWN AS PALM BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY. THIS
 SHOULD BE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY.
 THERE IS A PALM BEACH LOCATED ON PALM BEACH COUNTY
 WHICH IS NOT THIS JURISDICTION. PLEASE ADJUST.
  
 *******
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON PLANS WHICH SHOW MORE
 *R* FIXTURES THAN WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE IDR FOR EXTERIOR
 LIGHTS.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE THE INTERIOR LIGHTING FOR ROOM/AREA 147.
 PLANS SHOW 2-A3 FIXTURES AND 2-A3E FIXTURES. THE
 WATTAGE AS SHOWN ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND FOR EACH OF
 THESE FIXTURES IS 96W, YET THE INPUT DATA REPORT ONLY
 SHOWS 56W EACH.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE CONFERENCE ROOM #118 WHICH APPEARS TO SHOW A
 FIXTURE I1; HOWEVER THE IDR FOR THIS SAME ROOM DOES NOT
 INDICATE ANY WATTAGE FOR THIS SAME FIXTURE.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE DISPLAY AREA AT FRONT ENTRY. WHERE ARE THESE
 FIXTURES SHOWN ON THE IDR? WHERE IS THE FIXTURE M1? M1
 IS SHOWN AS A METAL HALIDE FIXTURE AND DOES NOT APPEARS
 ON THE COMPANY WEBSITE AS A CURRENT 3INCH HID FIXTURE.
 THERE ARE 3INCH FIXTURES HOWEVER THE WATTAGE IS HIGHER.
 THE SMALLEST HID FIXTURE LISTED IS 4INCH.
 PLEASE PROVIDE SPEC/CUT SHEET SHOWING THIS FIXTURE.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS ARE SHOWING THE EXIT SIGN FIGURED
 INTO THE CALCULATIONS HOWEVER SOME AREAS THESE ARE NOT
 FIGURED. PLEASE KNOW THAT THE EXIT SIGNS WHICH ARE NOT
 A PART OF THE NORMAL LIGHTING ARE EXEMPT. PLEASE ALSO
 SEE THE IDR SHOWS THE EXIT SIGNS AS BEING PART OF THE
 CENTRAL LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY TWO
 OF THESE EXIT SIGNS ARE ON THE IDR.
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE ROOM 130 WHICH SHOWS A6 AND A6E FIXTURES.
 THE FIXTURE LEGEND SHOWS 192W FOR EACH, YET THE IDR
 ONLY SHOWS 128W. WHAT IS THE POWER FACTOR ON THESE?
 EVEN WITH SOME OF THE HIGHEST EFFICIENCY FIXTURES THIS
 LEVEL OF 128W COULD NOT BE FOUND. BASED ON THE FIXTURE,
 THE FIXTURE LEGEND THE COMPANY WEBSITE SHOWS 219 INPUT
 WATTS WITH A POWER FACTOR OF .97.
  
 *** PLEASE GO THOUGH ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS AND
 COORDINATE WITH THE IDR.
 PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SPEC SHEET FOR THE A6 FIXTURES IS
 ATTACHED TO THE PLAN REVIEW NOTES.
 13-400.3.A, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO FS
 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE.
 THE 4X FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLAN REVIEW IS NOT ASSESSED
 ONLY DUE TO THE FACT THE INPUT DATA REPORT WAS NOT
 SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED ON THE SECOND REVIEW. THE CODE
 SECTIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE REMAIN AND NOTICE IS BEING
 GIVEN THAT THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ALONG WITH THE INPUT
 DATA REPORT MUST COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM CODE. UPON THE
 NEXT REVIEW IF THE CALCULATIONS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM
 CODE AND DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS A FEE OF $30,600
 WILL BE STATUTORILY REQUIRED TO BE ASSESSED.
 ONE SET OF PLANS/LIGHTING AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE
 BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE AND WILL BE PLACED WITH
 PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS WHICH HAVE BEEN RETAINED.
  
  
 ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY
 COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE
 DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE.
 PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION.
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR
 CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS
 INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT
 LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY
 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS,
 SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO
 TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY
 DELAYS.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved