| Date |
Text |
| 2008-03-20 17:08:00 | |
| | |
| | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE |
| | CYCLES: |
| | |
| | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 |
| | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, |
| | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 1} THE INTERIOR LIGHTING POWER ALLOWANCE FOR A BUILDING |
| | OR A SEPARATELY METERED OR PERMITTED PORTION OF A |
| | BUILDING SHALL BE DETERMINED BY EITHER THE BUILDING |
| | AREA METHOD DESCRIBED IN SECTION 415.2.C.1 OR THE |
| | SPACE-BY-SPACE METHOD DESCRIBED IN SECTION 415.2.B.1. |
| | TRADE-OFFS OF INTERIOR LIGHTING POWER ALLOWANCE AMONG |
| | PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING FOR WHICH A DIFFERENT METHOD |
| | OF CALCULATION HAS BEEN USED ARE NOT PERMITTED. THE |
| | INSTALLED INTERIOR LIGHTING POWER IDENTIFIED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 415.2.ABC.1.1 SHALL NOT EXCEED |
| | THE INTERIOR LIGHTING POWER ALLOWANCE DEVELOPED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 415.2.C.1 OR 415.2.B.1. THIS |
| | CAN BE DEMONSTRATED ON THE PLANS INDICATED THE WATTAGES |
| | OF THE LUMINAIRES CHOSEN FOR THE PROJECT CONFORM TO THE |
| | DENSITY REQUIREMENTS. THIS WAS NOT DONE.THE STATEMENT |
| | THAT THE MAXIMUM IS 1.4 W/SF DOES NOT INDICATE WHAT THE |
| | CALCULATED WATTAGE IS. THE DESIGNER MUST INDICATE HOW |
| | THE DENSITY COMPLIANCE WAS ACHIEVED. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. |
| | |
| | BILL TROBAUGH |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561/805-6718 |
